Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Divorce at the Notary: Protection of Creditors’ Interests Cover

Divorce at the Notary: Protection of Creditors’ Interests

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Aksin, O. Z. & Masini, A. (2008), ‘Effective Strategies for Internal Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: An Empirical Investigation,’ Journal of Operations Management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.02.003
  2. Bekenova, Z.; Müürsepp, P.; Nurysheva, G. & Turarbekova, L. (2022), ‘Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 79–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0004
  3. Bywater Consulting (2001), ‘Realising the Potential of Shared Services: Internal Outsourcing,’ Research Briefings, Stamford.
  4. Cetean-Voiculescu, L. (2016), ‘Extra Judicial Divorce Procedure,’ Annales Universitatis Apulensis, Series Jurisprudentia, vol. 19, pp. 19–25.
  5. Chamber of Notaries (2017a), ‘Teisingumo ministerijos atstovams pristatyta sistema eNotaras’ [eNotaras system presented to representatives of the Ministry of Justice], Notarų rūmai, June 6. Retrieved from https://notarurumai.lt/naujienos/teisingumo-ministerijos-atstovams-pristatyta-sistema-enotaras/186 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  6. Chamber of Notaries (2017b), ‘Turto perleidimo sistema per Notaro „vieną langelį“ – tarp pažangiausių pasaulyje, rodo tyrimas’ [The system of transferring assets through a notary’s “one-stop shop”—among the most advanced in the world, the study shows], Notarų rūmai, November 6. Retrieved from https://notarurumai.lt/naujienos/turto-perleidimo-sistema-per-notaro-viena-langelitarp-pazangiausiu-pasaulyje-rodo-tyrimas/202 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  7. Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania, no. VIII-1864, 18.7.2000, Vilnius. Last amended on 12.4.2011, no. XI-1312. Retrieved from https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalActPrint/lt?jfwid=32ocqrv7x&documentId=TAIS.400592&category=TAD [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  8. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4.11.1950.
  9. European e-Justice (n.d.), ‘Divorce and Legal Separation.” Retrieved from https://e-justice.europa.eu/45/EN/divorce_and_legal_separation?LATVIA&init=true&member=1 [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  10. Gerber, R. J. (1990), ‘Recommendation of Domestic Relations Reform,’ Arizona Law Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9–20.
  11. Guga, O. V. N. (2015), ‘Comparative Study between the Divorce, by Mutual Consent of Spouses, on Administrative Way and the Same Type of Divorce on Judicial Way,’ Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre, no. 2(78), pp. 177–182.
  12. Heriyanti, F.; Agustina, Y. & Pakpahan, E. F. (2020), ‘Readiness and Role of Notaries in Making Electronic Deeds towards the Industrial Revolution,’ In Proceedings of the International Conference on Culture Heritage, Education, Sustainable Tourism, and Innovation Technologies, Cesit 2020, pp. 105–112.
  13. Ionaş, D.-G. (2017), ‘Admissibility Conditions for Divorce by Notary Procedure,’ Law Review, pp. 162–169.
  14. Kraljić, S. (2020), ‘New Family Code and the Dejudicialization of Divorce in Slovenia,’ Balkan Social Science Review, vol. 15, pp. 158–177. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr20150158k
  15. Lietuvos teismai (n.d.), [Lithuanian courts]. Retrieved from https://teismai.lt [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  16. Mikelėnas, V. et al. (2022), Commentary on the Civil Code. Third Book. Family Law, Vilnius: Justitia.
  17. Mitrović, S. T. (2019), ‘Divorce by Mutual Agreement and Notary,’ Pravo—Teorija I Praksa, vol. 36, nos. 7–9, pp. 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1907056M
  18. Nicu, C. G. (2016), ‘Procedures for Dissolution of Marriage—Harmonization with European Legislation,’ Universul Juridic, pp. 178–183
  19. Preston, S. H. (1975), ‘Estimating the Proportion of American Marriages That End in Divorce,’ Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 435–460.
  20. Rigby, K. J. (1984), ‘Symposium: Alternate Dispute Resolution,’ Louisiana Law Review, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1725–1752.
  21. Ruggeri, L. & Giobbi, M. (2021), ‘Regímenes patrimoniales y registros de la propiedad de las parejas transfronterizas,’ Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia, no. 25, pp. 229–249.
  22. Ruggeri, L.; Kunda, I. & Winkler, S., eds. (2019), Family Property and Succession in EU Member States: National Reports on the Collected Data, Sveučilište u Rijeci: Pravni fakultet.
  23. Ruggeri, L.; Limantė, A. & Vogrinc, N. P. (2022), The EU Regulations on Matrimonial Property and Property of Registered Partnerships, Cambridge, Antwerp & Chicago: Intersentia.
  24. Saccuzzo, D. P. (2003), ‘Controversies in Divorce Mediation,’ North Dakota Law Review, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 425–438.
  25. Šekštelo, A. (2018), ‘Solidariųjų bendraskolių tarpusavio atgręžtiniai reikalavimai’ [Mutual recourse claims of joint and several co-debtors], Teisės Problemos [Legal problems], no. 2(96), pp. 44–58.
  26. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2006a), Civil Case no. 3K-3-350/2006, O.M. vs. R.M.
  27. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2006b), Civil Case no. 3K-3-474/2006, B.M. vs. A.M.
  28. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2008), Civil Case no. 3K-3-243/2008, Mr. E.G. R.G.
  29. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2013), Civil Case no. 3K-3-567/2013, E. S. vs. G.S.
  30. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania (2022), Civil Case no. e3K-3-5-916/2022, E.M. vs. A. M.
  31. Supreme Court of Lithuania (2008), Review of Practice on Actio Pauliana, Indirect Action, Right of Arrest and Application of Preventive Action Institutes, no. A-1.
  32. Trinkūnienė, E.; Trinkūnas, V. & Bublienė, R. (2022), ‘Mediation Like the Opportunity in Bailiffs’ Work,’ Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science (JLISS), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–182.
  33. Troitiño, D. (2022), ‘The European Union Facing the 21st Century: The Digital Revolution,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 60–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0003
  34. Tvaronavičienė, A. (2022), ‘Changes in Divorce by Mutual Consent of the Spouses. Will It Be Faster and Easier to Get a Divorce at a Notary?’ INFOLEX. Retrieved from https://www.infolex.lt/portal/start.asp?act=news&Tema=54&str=106719# [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  35. UNIDROIT (2016), UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Retrieved from https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-bl.pdf [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  36. Williams, S. E. (2015), ‘Are Notaries an Endangered Species?’ Retrieved from https://williamsassociates-ltd.com/articles/Are_Notaries_an_Endangered_Species_by_Steven_E_Williams.pdf [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
  37. Williamson, O. (1985), ‘Contractual Man,’ in The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press, pp. 43–63.
  38. Your Europe (2022), ‘Divorce and Legal Separation.” Retrieved from https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/family/couple/divorce-separation/index_en.htm [accessed 27 Feb 2023]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2023-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 137
Published on: Dec 9, 2023
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Eva Trinkūnienė, Tatjana Viškelienė, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.