References
- Andraško, J.; Horvat, M. & Mesarčík, M. (2019), Vybrané kapitoly práva informačných technológií I [Selected chapters of information technology law I], Bratislava: Comenius University.
- Aycaguer v. France [2017], ECtHR, 8806/12, 22.7.2017.
- Bakkar, Y. & Ögcem, A. R. (2019), ‘Democracy and economic development: Disentangling the effect of elections and rule of law,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 173–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-004210.1515/bjes-2019-0042
- Carpenter, C. (2020), ‘Privacy and proportionality: Examining mass electronic surveillance under Article 8 and the Fourth Amendment,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 27–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-000210.2478/iclr-2020-0002
- Coutis, S. (2011), ‘The Lisbon Treaty and the area of freedom, security and justice as an area of legal integration,’ Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, vol. 7, pp. 87–107. https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.07.2011.12110.3935/cyelp.07.2011.121
- Daňko, M. & Žárská, P. (2019), Data Protection vs. Intellectual Property: Computer Law, AI, Data Protection and the Latest Technological Trends, Brno: MSD.
- Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v. Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kärntner Landesregierung and Others [2014], ECJ, Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:238, 8.4.2014.
- Erdősová, A. (2010), ‘Právny zrod Charty základných práv EÚ—Pred a Po’ [The legal birth of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights—before and after], Bulletin slovenskej advokácie, nos. 9–10.
- European Union (2007), Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, OJ C 303/17, 14.12.2007.
- Fenyk, J. & Svák, J. (2008), Europeizace trestního práva [Europeanization of criminal law], Bratislava: Paneurópska vysoká škola (PEVŠ).
- Funta, R. (2011), ‘EU-USA privacy protection: Legislation and the Swift bank data transfer regulation: a short look,’ Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–33.
- Gaskin v. The United Kingdom [1989], ECtHR, 10454/83, 7.7.1989.
- General Secretariat of the Council (2021), The Impact of COVID-19 on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Executive Summary of Information Compiled by Eurojust and EJN, 6178/1/21 REV 1.
- Gregušová, D.; Dulak, A.; Chlipala, M. & Susko, B. (2005), Právo informačných a komunikačných technológií [Information and communication technology law], Bratislava: VO STU.
- de Hert, P. & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016), ‘The new police and criminal justice data protection directive: A first analysis,’ New Journal of European Criminal Law, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844160070010210.1177/203228441600700102
- de Hert, P. & Sajfert, J. (2017), ‘The role of the data protection authorities in supervising police and criminal justice authorities processing personal data,’ in C. Brière & A. Weyembergh (eds.) The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law: Past, Present and Future, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 243–255.
- Iliopoulos-Strangas, J.; Diggelmann, O. & Bauer, H. (2010), Rechtsstaat, Freiheit und Sicherheit in Europa. Rule of Law, Freedom and Security in Europe. État de droit, liberté et sécurité en Europe, Societas Iuris Publici Europaei, Bd. 6, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
- Ivor, J.; Klimek, L. & Záhora, J. (2013), Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky [Criminal law of the European Union and its influence on the legal order of the Slovak Republic], Žilina: Eurokódex.
- Jakab, A.; Könczöl, M.; Menyhárd, A. & Sulyok, G. (2021), Internet Jurisprudence: Encyclopedia, Budapest: HVG-ORAC.
- Jankuv, J.; Lantajová, D.: Šmid, M. & Blaškovič, K. (2015), Medzinárodné právo verejné [Public international law], Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
- Karácsony, G. (2019), ‘Managing personal data in a digital environment—did GDPR’s concept of informed consent really give us control?’ in Počítačové právo, UI, ochrana údajov a najväčšie technologické trendy. Zborník príspervkov z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. Vysoká skola Danubius [Computer law, AI, data protection and the latest technological trends: Proceedings of the international scientific conference, Danubius University], June 06 2019, Sládkovičovo, Slovak Republic, Brno: MSD, pp. 1–9.
- Kesa, A. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable nemeses?’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 3 (32), pp. 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-002210.1515/bjes-2020-0022
- Klátik, J. (2020), Trestné právo hmotné [Substantive criminal law], Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
- Klimek, L. (2012), ‘Free movement of evidence in criminal matters in the EU,’ The Lawyer Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 250–290.
- Kopp v. Switzerland [1998], ECtHR, 23224/94, 25.3.1998.
- Kováčik, B. (2010), ‘Chosen aspects of EU institutional reform within the context of the Lisbon Treaty,’ in G. Rouet & P. Terem (eds.) L′Ukraine, entre integration et partenariat / Ukraine, Between Integration and Partnership, Brussels: Bruylant.
- Králik, J. & Králiková, K. (2007), Základná inštitucionálna báza ochrany ľudských práv [Basic institutional basis for the protection of human rights], Brno: Masaryk University.
- Lacuška, M. & Peráček, T. (2021), ‘Trends in global telecommunication fraud and its impact on business,’ in N. Kryvinska & M. Greguš (eds.) Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 330, Cham: Springer, pp. 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62151-3_1210.1007/978-3-030-62151-3_12
- La Quadrature du Net (C-511/18 and C-512/18), French Data Network (C-511/18 and C-512/18), Fédération des fournisseurs d’accès à Internet associatifs (C-511/18 and C-512/18), Igwan.net (C-511/18) v Premier ministre (C-511/18 and C-512/18), Garde des Sceaux, ministre de la Justice (C-511/18 and C-512/18), Ministre de l’Intérieur (C-511/18), Ministre des Armées (C-511/18), Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone, Académie Fiscale ASBL, UA, Liga voor Mensenrechten ASBL, Ligue des Droits de l’Homme ASBL, VZ, WY, XX v. Conseil des ministers [2020], ECJ, Joined cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18, OJ C-433/3, ECLI:EU:C:2020:791, 14.12.2020.
- Leander v. Sweden [1987], ECtHR, 9248/81, 26.3.1987.10.1086/ges.26.2.767085
- Marquenie, T. (2017), ‘The Police and Criminal Justice Authorities Directive: Data protection standards and impact on the legal framework,’ Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.00910.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.009
- Maximilian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner [2015], ECJ, C-362/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:650, 30.11.2015.
- Mazák, J. & Jánošíková, M. (2009), Základy práva Európskej únie [Fundamentals of European Union law], Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer.
- M. K. v. France [2013], ECtHR, 19522/09 final, 18.7.2013.
- Müller-Graff, P. C. (2009), ‘Der Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts’ [The area of freedom, security and justice] (mit Friedemann Kainer), in W. Weidenfeld & W. Wessels (eds.) Taschenbuch der europäischen Integration, 11. Aufl., Berlin.10.5771/9783845213514-104
- Neszméry, Š. (2019), ‘Zverejňovanie fotografií osôb podozrivých zo spáchania trestného činu v médiách’ [Publication of photographs of persons suspected of committing a crime in the media], in Počítačové právo, UI, ochrana údajov a najväčšie technologické trendy. Zborník príspervkov z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. Vysoká skola Danubius [Computer law, AI, data protection and the latest technological trends: Proceedings of the international scientific conference, Danubius University], June 06 2019, Sládkovičovo, Slovak Republic, Brno: MSD.
- Panevski, D.; Peráček, T. & Rentková, K. (2021), ‘Analysis of the practices of financial intelligence units (FIUs) and other anti-money laundering agencies within EU,’ in N. Kryvinska & A. Poniszewska-Marańda (eds.) Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 376, Cham: Springer, vol. 376, pp. 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76632-0_810.1007/978-3-030-76632-0_8
- Peck v. The United Kingdom [2003], ECtHR, 44647/98, 28.1.2003.
- Peráček, T.; Mucha, B. & Brestovanská, P. (2019), ‘Selected legislative aspects of cybernetic security in the Slovak Republic,’ in Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 23, pp. 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98557-2_2510.1007/978-3-319-98557-2_25
- Pirošíková, M. & Siman, M. (2012), Ľudské práva: Vybrané rozhodnutia Európskeho súdu pre Íudské práva a Súdneho dvora Európskej únie [Human rights: Selected judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union], Bratislava: Euroiuris.
- Plavčan, P. & Funta, R. (2020), ‘Some economic characteristics of internet platforms,’ Danube, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 156–167. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-000910.2478/danb-2020-0009
- Privacy International v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others [2020], ECJ, C-623/17, OJ C-22/29, ECLI:EU:C:2020:790, 6.10.2020, pp. 29–30.
- Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v. Telefónica de España SAU [2008], ECJ, C-275/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:54, 29.1.2008.
- Roman Zakharov v. Russia [2015], ECtHR, 47143/06, 4.12.2015.
- Rotaru v. Romania [2000], ECtHR, 28341/95, 4.5.2000.
- Rotenberg, M.; Horwitz, J. & Scott, J., eds. (2015), Privacy in the Modern Age: The Search for Solutions, New York & London: The New Press.
- S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom [2008], ECtHR, Joined cases 30562/04 and 30566/04, 4.12.2008.
- Šmejkal, V. (2020), ‘Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on European Antitrust. Mere adaptations or real changes?’ Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper, no. 2020/II/1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.362482410.2139/ssrn.3624824
- Šmejkal, V. & Svobodová, M. (2018), ‘ECJ’s new role—guardian of open but not socially inclusive Europe?’ Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 11–32, https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2018.02.02.0110.15290/eejtr.2018.02.02.01
- Šramel, B. & Horváth, P. (2021), ‘Internet as the communication medium of the 21st century: Do we need a special legal regulation of freedom of expression on the internet?’ The Lawyer Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 141–157.
- Stehlík, V. (2009), ‘EU human rights protection under the Treaty of Lisbon,’ in Human Rights. The Modern State System’s Formation: Theoretical and Practical Aspects, Kyiv: Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine, pp. 123–127.
- Stehlík, V.; Hamuľák, O. & Petr, M. (2017), Právo Evropské unie: ústavní základy a vnitřní trh [European Union law: Constitutional foundations and the internal market], Praha: Leges.
- Svoboda, P. (2009), ‘Znovu k hospodářské podpoře terorismu v judikatuře EU’ [Revisiting the economic support of terrorism in EU case-law], Trestněprávní revue, no. 1.
- Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary [2016], ECtHR, 37138/14, 12.1.2016.
- Tele2 Sverige AB v. Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Tom Watson, Peter Brice, Geoffrey Lewis [2016], ECJ, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:970, 21.12.2016.
- Tzanou, M. (2013), ‘Data protection as a fundamental right next to privacy? “Reconstructing” a not so new right,’ International Data Privacy Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipt00410.1093/idpl/ipt004
- Vermeulen, G.; de Bondt, W. & Ryckman, C., eds. (2012), Rethinking International Cooperation in Criminal Matters in the EU. Moving Beyond Actors, Bringing Logic Back, Footed in Reality, IRCP Research Series vol. 42, Antwerpen: Maklu.
- Yara, O.; Brazheyev, A.; Golovko, L. & Bashkatova, V. (2021), ‘Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence: Problems and development prospects,’ European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 281–289. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p28110.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p281