Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stability analysis is used to evaluate sugar beet genotypes with the goal of maximizing root and white sugar yield Cover

Stability analysis is used to evaluate sugar beet genotypes with the goal of maximizing root and white sugar yield

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Alam Z., Akter S., Khan M.A.H., Amin M.N., Karim M.R., Rahman M.H.S., Rashid M.H., Rahman M.M., Mokarroma N., Sabuz A.A., Alam, M.J. (2024): Multivariate analysis of yield and quality traits in sweet potato genotypes (Ipomoea batatas L.). Sci. Hortic. 328: 112901.
  2. Amelework A.B., Bairu M.W., Marx R., Laing M., Venter S.L. (2023): Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis of selected cassava cultivars in South Africa. Plants 12(13): p.2490.
  3. Cooke D.A., Scott J.E. (2012): The sugar beet crop. Springer Science & Business Media.
  4. Dirim E., Say A., Arslan M. (2024): Assessment of genetic diversity, yield and quality performance of O-Type Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 71(4): 1605-1614.
  5. FAO (2023): Crops and livestock products in 2021. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat [Accessed 22 January 2024].
  6. Fasahat P., Aghaeezadeh M., Jabbari L., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S., Townson P. (2018): Sucrose accumulation in sugar beet: From fodder beet selection to genomic selection. Sugar Tech. 20: 635-644.
  7. Fasahat, P., Hosseinpour, M., Kakueinezhad, M., Hemayati, S.S., Laidig, F. (2023): Effect of latitude on sugar beet bolting occurrence. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo 69(2): 181-190.
  8. Fasahat P., Hosseinpour M., Kakueinezhad M., Townson P. (2022): Physiological and molecular aspects of sucrose accumulation in sugar beet. In: Misra, V., Srivastava, S., Mall, A.K. eds. Sugar beet cultivation, management and processing. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore: 27-48.
  9. Fasahat P., Muhammad K., Abdullah A., Rahman B.M.A., Siing N.M., Gauch J.H.G., Ratnam W. (2014): Genotype× environment assessment for grain quality traits in rice. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science 9(2): 71-82.
  10. Fasahat P., Rajabi A., Rad J.M., Derera J.J.B.B.I.J. (2016): Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal 4(1): 1-24.
  11. Fasahat P., Rezaei J., Sharifi M., Azizi H., Fotuhi K., Mahdikhani P., Pedram A., Jalilian A., Babaei B. (2024): Analysis of the genotype by environment interactions of sugar beet genotypes under rhizomania contamination. J Agric Sci Tech. 26: 805-817.
  12. Galanakis, C.M. (2024): The future of food. Foods 13(4): 506.
  13. Gauch H.G., Zobel R.W. (1996): AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang, M.S., Gauch, H.G., eds, Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press: 85–122.
  14. Jaggard K.W., Qi A., Ober E.S. (2010): Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philos T R Soc B. 365: 2835–2851.
  15. Khan M.M.H., Rafii M.Y., Ramlee S.I., Jusoh M., Al Mamun M. (2021): AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trials (METs). Sci Rep. 11(1): 22791.
  16. Lee S.Y., Lee H.S., Lee C.M., Ha S.K., Park H.M., Lee S.M., Kwon Y., Jeung J.U., Mo Y. (2023): Multi-environment trials and stability analysis for yield-related traits of commercial rice cultivars. Agriculture 13(2): 256.
  17. Luterbacher M.C., Asher M.J.C., Beyer W., Mandolino G., Scholten O.E., Frese L., Biancardi E., Stevanato P., Mechelke W., Slyvchenko O. (2005): Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related Beta germplasm: II. Soil-borne diseases. Euphytica 141: 49–63.
  18. Mullualem D., Tsega A., Mengie T., Fentie D., Kassa Z., Fassil A., Wondaferew D., Gelaw T.A., Astatkie T. (2024): Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Heliyon 10(12).
  19. Murphy S.E., Lee E.A., Woodrow L., Seguin P., Kumar J., Rajcan I., Ablett G.R. (2009): Genotype × Environment interaction and stability for isoflavone content in soybean. Crop Sci. 49: 1313–1321.
  20. Oladosu Y., Rafii M.Y., Abdullah N., Magaji U., Miah G., Hussin G., Ramli A. (2017): Genotype × environment interaction and stability analyses of yield and yield components of established and mutant rice genotypes tested in multiple locations in Malaysia. Acta Agr Scand B-S P. 67(7): 590–606.
  21. Olivoto T., Lúcio A.D., da Silva J.A., Marchioro V.S., de Souza V.Q., Jost E. (2019): Mean performance and stability in multi‐environment trials I: combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agron J. 111(6): 2949-2960.
  22. Oroian C., Ugruțan F., Mureșan I.C., Oroian I., Odagiu A., Petrescu-Mag I.V., Burduhos P. (2023): AMMI analysis of genotype× environment interaction on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, sugar content and production in Romania. Agronomy. 13(10): 2549.
  23. Reinefeld E., Emmerich A., Baumgarten G., Winner C., Beiß U.M. (1974): Zur voraussage des melassezuckers aus rubenanalysen. Zucker. (in German)
  24. Sivapalan S., O'brien L., Ortiz-Ferrara G., Hollamby G.J., Barclay I., Martin P.J. (2000): An adaptation analysis of Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA wheat germplasm in Australian production environments. Crop Pasture Sci. 51: 903–915.
  25. Tariku S., Lakew T., Bitew M., Asfaw M. (2013): Genotype by environment interaction and grain yield stability analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes evaluated in north western Ethiopia. Net Journal of Agricultural Science. 1: 10–16.
  26. UN/DESA (2017): World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100. Available at: https://www.un.org/ht/desa/world-population-projected-reach-98-billion-2050-and-112-billion-2100 [accessed 22 January 2024].
  27. Wang R., Wang H., Huang S., Zhao Y., Chen E., Li F., Qin L., Yang Y., Guan Y.A., Liu B., Zhang H. (2023): Assessment of yield performances for grain sorghum varieties by AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Front Plant Sci. 14: 1261323.
  28. Yan W., Hunt L.A. (2001): Interpretation of genotype – environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41: 19-25.
  29. Yan W., Kang M.S., Ma B., Woods S., Cornelius P.L. (2007): GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47: 643–655.
  30. Yousefabadi V.A., Mehdikhani P., Nadali F., Sharifi M., Azizi H., Ahmadi M., Fasahat P. (2024): Evaluation of yield and stability of sugar beet (beta vulgaris L.) genotypes using GGE biplot and AMMI analysis. Sci Rep. 14(1): 27384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2025-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2199-577X | Journal ISSN: 1896-3811
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 48
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Parviz Fasahat, Javad Rezaei, Heydar Azizi, Hamzeh Hamzeh, Saeed Darabi, Ali Jalilian, Rahim Mohammadian, published by Polish Biometric Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.