Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the relationship between coefficients of relatedness and molecular similarity of parental forms with respect to the heterosis effect in maize Cover

Analysis of the relationship between coefficients of relatedness and molecular similarity of parental forms with respect to the heterosis effect in maize

Biometrical Letters
Volume 50 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2013
References

References

  1. Adamczyk J. (1998): A review of maize breeding methods and their practical applicability. Biul. IHAR 208: 123-130.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Adamczyk J. (2001): The role of new hybrids in enhancing efficiency of different utilisation systems of maize. Appendix to “Agro Serwis”. Biznes-Press. Warsaw: 7-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Ajmone Marsan P., Castiglioni P., Fusari F., Kuiper M., Motto M. (1998): Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 61-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Barciszewski J., Gunhil E., Siboska, Bent O., Pedersen Brian F.C., Clark Suresh I.S. Rattan. (1996): Evidence for the presence of kinetin in DNA and cell extracts. FEBS Letters 393: 197-200.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Becker H.C., Link W. (2000): Heterosis and hybrid breeding. MCC 2000 Mende: l-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bernardo R. (1992): Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 628-634. Centenary Congress: 319-327.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Dudley J.W., Saghai Maroot M.N., Rufener S.K. (1992): Molecular marker information and selection of parents in corn breeding programs Crop. Sci. 32: 301-304.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Dhillon B.S., Singh J. (1997): Combining ability and heterosis in diallele crosses in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 3: 117-122.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Henderson C. R. (1994): Estimation of changes in herd environment. J. Dairy Sci. 32: 706.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Jaccard P. (1901): Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37: 547-579.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Królikowski Z. (1977): Inheritance of some quantitative characters of maize under diallelic crossing. Genet. Pol. 1: 15-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Melehinger A.E., Lee M., Lamkey K.R., Woodman A. (1990): Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphism. Relation to estimated effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 30: 1033-1040
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Nei M., and Li W. H. (1979): Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5269-5273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Peng S., Yang J., Garcia F. V., Laza R.C., Visperas R.M., Sanico A. L., Chavez A. Q., Virmani S.S. (1998): Physiology-based crop management for yield maximization of hybrid rice. Advances in Hybrid Rice Technology, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Hybrid Rice 14-16 November 1996 Hyderabad India: 12-13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Peng J. Y., Glaszmann J. C., Virmani S.S. (1988): Heterosis and isozyme divergence in Indica. Crop Science 28(3): 561-563.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Phillips R.L., Visil J.K. (2001): DNA-Based Markers in Plants. Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants 6: 125-131.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Rafalski A., Gidzińska M., Wiśniewska I. (1998): Systemy PCR w badaniach pokrewieństwa genetycznego linii kukurydzy [PCR systems in studies on genetic relationship in maize lines]. Biul. IHAR 208: 131-140.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Sprague G.F., Eberhardt S.A. (1997): Corn Breeding. In: Corn and Corn Improvement.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Spraque F.G. (ed.), Agron. Monog. 18., ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin: 14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Stuber C., Lincoln S.E., Wolff T., Helentiaris T. (1992): Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Sztuba-Solińska J. (2006): KOSMOS - problemy nauk biologicznych PTP 54: 227-239.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Thompson D., Henry R. (1995): Single step protocol for preparation of plant tissue for analysis by PCR. Biotechniques, 19: 394-400.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Tomkowiak A., Broda Z., Moliński K. (2010): Attempt to adapt a mathematical model for the heterosis effect in maize F1 hybrids depending on the genetic distance of parental forms. Plant Breeding and Seed Science IHAR 62: 72-89.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Tomkowiak A., Broda Z., Adamczyk J. (2009): Assessment of genetic diversity of corn lines suitable for breeding of heterosis hybrids, based on molecular markers AFLP and RAPD. ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 8 (1): 69-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2013-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2199-577X (formerly 1896-3811) | Journal ISSN: 1896-3811
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 52
Published on: Jun 5, 2013
Published by: Polish Biometric Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
relationship,
molecular similarity,
maize,
AFLP,
RAPD
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Bioinformatics,
Life sciences, other,
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics,
Applied mathematics

© 2013 Agnieszka Tomkowiak, Zbigniew Broda, Krzysztof Moliński, Marta Molińska-Glura, Józef Adamczyk, published by Polish Biometric Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 50 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)
Previous article
Next article