Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metabolic syndrome outcomes and insulin resistance among former elite middle-aged combat sports athletes with a history of rapid weight loss: A case–control study Cover

Metabolic syndrome outcomes and insulin resistance among former elite middle-aged combat sports athletes with a history of rapid weight loss: A case–control study

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

All included sports in both groups of former elite athletes

Groups and types of sportsFrequencies (%) of athletes
RWL group56 (52)
Box8 (14)
Jiu-Jitsu4 (7)
Judo14 (25)
Karate12 (21)
Kickboxing5 (9)
Sambo12 (22)
Taekwondo1 (2)
Control group52 (48)
Athletics8 (15)
Mountain climbing5 (10)
Rowing4 (8)
Soccer33 (63)
Swimming2 (4)

Note: RWL = rapid weight loss.

Source: Authors’ contribution.

Table 2

Demographic and lifestyle parameters of the analyzed groups

VariablesRWL groupControl group P value
Age (years)51.93 ± 7.8051.12 ± 7.360.504
Body height (cm)176.77 ± 6.31180.37 ± 7.14 0.005
Body weight (kg)92.11 ± 15.6888.66 ± 13.430.290
Body mass index (kg/m²)29.39 ± 4.2327.11 ± 3.67 0.001
Walking (min)239.57 ± 315.43288.92 ± 456.920.816
Moderate physical activity (min)179.25 ± 385.83215.31 ± 558.000.411
Vigorous physical activity (min)110.25 ± 164.88123.92 ± 246.290.728
Sedentary behavior (min)1476.43 ± 950.301832.31 ± 1414.200.279
Alcohol, n (%)23 (41%)31 (60%)0.054
Smoking, n (%)5 (9%)5 (10%)0.902

Note: RWL = rapid weight loss. Bolded P value indicates statistically significant differences between groups.

Source: Authors’ contribution.

Table 3

Differences between groups regarding metabolic health outcomes

Outcome measuresRWL groupControl groupMean differences (95% CI) Z values r P value
Waist circumference (cm)104.84± 7.96103.62± 7.041.22 (−1.65, 4.10)−0.86−0.080.391
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)103.87 ± 25.1995.33 ± 15.218.55 (0.67, 16.44)−1.94−0.190.053
Systolic blood pressure (mm/Hg)130.20 ± 9.98124.96 ± 12.895.24 (0.81, 9.67)−4.37−0.42 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mm/Hg)84.73 ± 10.4276.79 ± 7.947.94 (4.42, 11.46)−4.38−0.42 <0.001
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)23.12 ± 5.3622.54 ± 4.310.58 (−1.28, 2.45)−0.54−0.050.588
Triglycerides (mg/dL)34.15 ± 18.7725.16 ± 13.258.99 (2.75, 15.23)−2.88−0.28 0.004
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)61.70 ± 16.2959.34 ± 15.272.36 (−3.67, 8.40)−1.51−0.150.132
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)100.41 ± 15.6793.92 ± 17.756.49 (0.11, 12.87)−2.55−0.25 0.011
Fasting insulin (μIU/mL)12.58 ± 10.279.43 ± 6.033.14 (−0.05, 6.34)−1.46−0.140.144
HOMA-IR3.54 ± 3.832.28 ± 1.581.26 (0.15, 2.37)−1.75−0.170.081

Note: HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; RWL = rapid weight loss. Bolded P value indicates statistically significant differences between groups.

Source: Authors’ contribution.

Table 4

The levels of fasting insulin and fasting glucose before and after OGTT for both groups

GroupsOutcome measures
RWL groupFasting insulinFasting glucose
Baseline12.58 ± 10.27103.89 ± 25.19
Final67.34 ± 65.58120.92 ± 52.10
Mean differences (95% CI)−54.76 (−71.20, 38.33)***36.54 (−26.82, −7.25)**
Z values−6.49−3.06
r −0.610.30
Control group
Baseline9.43 ± 6.0395.33 ± 15.21
Final43.25 ± 30.8696.96 ± 30.73
Mean differences (95% CI)−33.81 (−42.12, −25.50)***−1.63 (−9.05, 5.79)
Z values−6.19−0.22
r −0.610.02
Between-group differences
P value 0.026 # 0.023 #

Note: OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; RWL = rapid weight loss. ***Statistically significant differences between baseline and final measurement, p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon test). **Statistically significant differences between baseline and final measurement, p < 0.01 (Wilcoxon test). #Statistically significant differences between included groups at the final measurement (Mann–Whiteny U test). Bolded P value indicates statistically significant differences between groups.

Source: Authors’ contribution.

Figure 1

Prevalence of MS and overweight and obesity among athletes with a history of RWL and matched male controls. MS = metabolic syndrome; RWL = rapid weight loss. ***Statistically significant differences between groups, p < 0.001. **Statistically significant differences between groups, p < 0.01. Adjusted binary logistic regression analysis has been applied, using a variable age as a covariate

Source: Authors’ contribution.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2026-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2234 | Journal ISSN: 2080-2234
Language: English
Page range: 247 - 257
Submitted on: Jun 2, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 29, 2026
Published on: Sep 4, 2026
Published by: University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Nemanja Maksimovic, Marko Manojlovic, Tatjana Trivic, Yerlan Seisenbekov, Nemanja Lakicevic, Antonino Bianco, Patrik Drid, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.