Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Modern Light Water Nuclear Reactors of Generation III+ and Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Solutions in the Field of Nuclear Fuel and Management Cover

Modern Light Water Nuclear Reactors of Generation III+ and Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Solutions in the Field of Nuclear Fuel and Management

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. World Nuclear Association, “Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors,” Accessed: june, 2025, available: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/advanced-nuclear-power-reactors
  2. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “Status Report - EPR (France),” IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) Database, IAEA, Vienna, 2021.
  3. IAEA, “Status Report - AP 1000 (United States of America),” IAEA ARIS Database, IAEA, Vienna, 2024.
  4. IAEA, “Status Report - VVER-1200 (V-491) (Russian Federation),” IAEA ARIS Database, IAEA, Vienna, 2021.
  5. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), “State-of-the-Art Report on Light Water Reactor Accident-Tolerant Fuels,” NEA No. 7317, OECD, 2018.
  6. Idaho National Laboratory, “High-Assay Low Enriched Uranium Demand and Deployment Options,” HALEU Workshop Report, June 2020.
  7. Centrus Energy Corp., High Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), Accessed: june, 2025, available: https://www.centrusenergy.com/what-we-do/nuclear-fuel/high-assay-low-enriched-uranium/
  8. IAEA, “Status and advances in MOX fuel technology,” Technical Reports Series, ISSN 0074–1914; no. 415, IAEA, Vienna, 2003.
  9. N.V. Kovalev et al, “A new approach to the recycling of spent nuclear fuel in thermal reactors within the REMIX concept,” Nuclear Energy and Technology 6(2): 93–98, 2020. doi: 10.3897/NUCET.6.54624
  10. Baryshnikov M & Zhurbenko E., “The Commercial Potential of the Dual-Component Nuclear Power System,” International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable Development FR17 26–29 June 2017 Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.
  11. J.S. Kim et al, “Reactor core design with practical gadolinia burnable absorbers for soluble boron-free operation in the innovative SMR,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 3144-3154, 2024. doi: 10.1016/J.NET.2024.03.015
  12. J.R. Burns et al, “Reactor and fuel cycle performance of light water reactor fuel with 235U enrichments above 5%,” Annals of Nuclear Energy 142, 107423, 2020. doi: 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2020.107423
  13. A. A. Bystrikov et al, “Experience in using uranium– erbium fuel in power-generating units with RBMK-1000 reactors,” Atomic Energy, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 165–170, 2006. doi: 10.1007/S10512-006-0067-7
  14. K.S. Chaudri et al, “Excess reactivity control using innovative burnable absorber configuration for a 24-month cycle APR-1400,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, 128, pp. 166-174, 2025. doi: 10.1016/J. AEJ.2025.05.056
  15. M.J. Bolukbasi et al., “Performance and economic assessment of enriched gadolinia burnable absorbers,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, 137 (2021), 103752. doi: 10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2021.103752
  16. R. Pergeffi et al, “Neutronics characterization of an erbia fully poisoned PWR assembly by means of the APOLLO2 code,” EPJ Nuclear Sci. Technol. 3, 8 (2017). doi: 10.1051/EPJN/2017001
  17. Y. Kim et al, “Possible power increase in a natural circulation Soluble-Boron-Free Small Modular Reactor using the Truly Optimized PWR lattice,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55, 330-338 (2023). doi: 10.1016/J.NET.2022.09.003
  18. Yahya, M. S., & Kim, Y., “An innovative core design for a soluble-boron-free small pressurized water reactor,” International Journal of Energy Research, 42(1), 73-81, (2018). doi: 10.1002/ER.3792
  19. Leverenz R., Gerhard L., Göbel A., “The European Pressurized Water Reactor – A Safe and Competitive Solution for Future Energy Needs,” International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe, Portorož, Slovenia, Sept. 6–9, 2004. https://inis.iaea.org/records/xh6p6-kjk02
  20. S.M.T. Rahman et al., “Holistic Approach to Safety and Operational Stability: Analyzing VVER-1200 Reactor Dynamics in SGTR and AC Power Loss,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 441–453, 2024. doi: 10.4236/jpee.2024.129007
  21. P. Gaio, “AP1000: The PWR Revisited,” Proceedings of an International Conference on Opportunities and Challenges for Water Cooled Reactors in the 21. Century, IAEA, p. 63, 2011. https://inis.iaea.org/records/c4s40-w3881
  22. J.N. Reyes Jr, “NuScale plant safety in response to extreme events,” Nuclear Technology, 178(2), pp. 153–163, 2012. doi: 10.13182/NT12-A13556
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bhee-2026-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2566-3151 | Journal ISSN: 2566-3143
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 19, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 11, 2025
Published on: Jun 9, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Đorđe Lazarević, published by Bosnia and Herzegovina National Committee CIGRÉ
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT