Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Embeddedness or Marginalization? Aspects for Analysing the Local Embeddedness of Innovative Agricultural Enterprises in Szeklerland Cover

Embeddedness or Marginalization? Aspects for Analysing the Local Embeddedness of Innovative Agricultural Enterprises in Szeklerland

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Aldrich, Howard E., Cliff, Jennifer E. 2003. The Pervasive Effects of Family on Entrepreneurship: Toward a Family Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 573–596.10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
  2. Biró, A. Zoltán. 2006. Vidéki térségek: illúzió vagy esély? TÉRSÉG könyvek. Miercurea Ciuc: Pro-Print.
  3. 2016. A fiatal gazdák innovációs szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. In: Biró, A. Z., Magyar, F. (eds.), Agrárinnováció – térségi esély. Fiatal gazdák a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus. 13–56.
  4. 2017. Új elitszerepek rurális környezetben. In: Biró, A. Z., Magyar, F. (eds.), A generációváltás esélyei. Agrárvállalkozók innovatív szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus. 13–39.
  5. 2019. Székelyföld: társadalomtudományi megközelítések. Metszetek 8 (2): 3–16.10.18392/metsz/2019/2/1
  6. Biró, A. Zoltán, Magyar, Ferenc. 2013. Vidék és versenyképesség. Agrárinnovációs helyzetkép a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.
  7. 2017. A generációváltás esélyei. Agrárvállalkozók innovatív szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.
  8. Bock, Bettina Barbara. 2012. Social Innovation and Sustainability: How to Disentangle the Buzzword and Its Application in the Field of Agriculture and Rural Development. Studies in Agricultural Economics 114: 57–63.10.7896/j.1209
  9. Boonstra, Wiebren J., Ahnström, Johan, Hallgren, Lars. 2011. Swedish Farmers Talking about Nature. Sociologia Ruralis 51(4): 420–435.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00547.x
  10. Bosworth, Gary, Willett, Joanie. 2011. Embeddedness or Escapism? Rural Perceptions and Economic Development in Cornwall and Northumberland. Sociologia Ruralis 51(2): 195–214.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00533.x
  11. Cederholm Björklund, J., Johansson, Jeaneth. 2019. Farming beyond Food: Effect of Embeddedness and Governance Structures on Farmers’ Role in Rural Development. (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1384688/FULLTEXT01.pdf).
  12. Commandeur, Monica Alida Maria. 2006. Diversity of Pig Farming Styles: Understanding How It Is Structured. NJAS 54 (1): 111–127.10.1016/S1573-5214(06)80007-2
  13. Dudek, Michael. 2016. Economic Activity in Agriculture in the Perspective of Embeddedness Theory: The Case of Poland. Economics of Agriculture 1: 205–215.10.5937/ekoPolj1601205D
  14. Fischer, Heike, Burton, Rob, J. F. 2014. Understanding Farm Succession as Socially Constructed Endogenous Cycles. Sociologia Ruralis 54(4): 417–438.10.1111/soru.12055
  15. Floysand, Arnt, Sjoholt, Peter. 2007. Rural Development and Embeddedness: The Importance of Human Relations for Industrial Restructuring in Rural Areas. Sociologia Ruralis 47(3): 205–227.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00438.x
  16. Gedajlovic, Eric, Honig, Benson, Moore, Curt. B., Payne, G. Tyge, Wright, Mike. 2013. Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 37(3): 455–478.
  17. Gergen, Kenneth, J., Gergen, Mary, M. 2001. A narratívumok és az én mint viszonyrendszer. In: László, J., Thomka, B. (eds.), Narratívák 5. Narratív pszichológia. Budapest: Kijárat Kiadó. 77–120.
  18. Gezelius, Stig S. 2014. Exchange and Social Structure in Norwegian Agricultural Communities: How Farmers Acquire Labour and Capital. Sociologia Ruralis 54(2): 206–226.10.1111/soru.12042
  19. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.10.1086/228311
  20. Hansen, Niles. 1995. Addressing Regional Disparity and Equity Objectives through Regional Policies: A Sceptical Perspective. Papers in Regional Science 74: 89–104.10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00630.x
  21. Hinrics, C. Clare. 2000. Embeddedness and Local Food Systems: Notes on Two Types of Direct Agricultural Market. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 295–303.10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00063-7
  22. Hite, M. Julie. 2005. Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 29(1): 113–144.
  23. Jack, Sarah L., Anderson, Alistair L. 2002. The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing 17(5): 476–487.10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
  24. KAM. 2004. Székelyföldi háztartásvizsgálat 2004. Research report (manuscript). 2011. Székelyföldi háztartásvizsgálat 2011. Research report (manuscript).
  25. Kietavainen, Asta. 2013. Narrated Agency and Identity of Settlement Farmers in the Changing Circumstances of Modern Society. Sociologia Ruralis 54(1): 57–70.10.1111/soru.12028
  26. Laki, László, Biró A. Zoltán. 2001. On the Edge of Globalisation. Central European Political Science Review 2(5): 185–218.
  27. Lombardi, Alessia, Migliore, Giuseppina, Verneau, Fabio, Schifani, Giorgio, Cembalo, Luigi. 2015. Are “Good Guys” More Likely to Participate in Local Agriculture? Food Quality and Preference 45: 158–165.10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.005
  28. McKeever, Edward, Jack, Sarah, Anderson, Alistair. 2014. Social Embeddedness in Entrepreneurship Research: The Importance of Context and Community. In: Chell, E., Karataş-Özkan, M. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Small Business Entrepreneurship. London: Edward Elgar. 222–236.
  29. 2015. Embedded Entrepreneurship in the Creative Re-Construction of Place. Journal of Business Venturing 30(1): 50–65.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002
  30. Magyar, Ferenc. 2018. Kísérlet vagy modell? Az agrárinnováció mint székelyföldi fejlesztési paradigma. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.
  31. 2019. Digitális agrárium – székelyföldi innováció. Az agrárium digitalizációjának térségi környezete. Miercurea Ciuc: Státus.
  32. Murdoch, Jonathan. 2000. Networks: A New Paradigm of Rural Development? Journal of Rural Studies 16(4): 407–419.10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X
  33. Müller, Sabine, Korsgaard, Steffen. 2018. Resources and Bridging: The Role of Spatial Context in Rural Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 30(1–2): 224–255.10.1080/08985626.2017.1402092
  34. OECD. 2006. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD Publications.
  35. Polanyi, Karl. 1944/2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
  36. Schifani, Giorgio, Migliore, Giuseppina, Hashem, Shadi, Pietro, Romeo. 2016. Identifying Social Entrepreneurial Behaviour in Farmers’ Participation in Alternative Food Network. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics 71(1): 495–504.
  37. Shucksmith, Mark. 2010. Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-Endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts. Sociologia Ruralis 50(1): 1–14.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x
  38. Uzzi, Brian. 1997. Social Structure and Competition: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35–67.10.2307/2393808
  39. Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe. 1994. Styles of Farming. An Introductory Note on Concepts and Methodology. In: Van der Ploeg, J. D., Long, A. (eds.), Born from within. Practices and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development. Assen: Van Gorcum. 7–30.
  40. Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe, Renting, Henk, Brunori, Gianluca, Knickel, Karlheinz, Mannion, Joe, Marsden, Terry, De Roest, Kees, Sevilla-Guzmán, Eduardo, Ventura, Flaminia. 2000. Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 391–408.10.1111/1467-9523.00156
  41. Ward, Neil. 2002. Integrated Rural Development – A Review of the Literature. Centre for Rural Research, University of Trondheim.
  42. Zahra, Shaker. 2007. Contextualizing Theory Building in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Venturing 22(3): 433–452.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007
  43. Zukin, Sharon, Dimaggio, Paul. 1990. Introduction. In: Zukin, S., DiMaggio, P. (eds.), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–36.
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 93
Published on: Oct 29, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Biró A. Zoltán, Ágnes Sárosi-Blága, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.