Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in Reading Texts in EFL/ESL Settings Cover

Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in Reading Texts in EFL/ESL Settings

Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. Anderson, L. D., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley-Longman, Inc.
  2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
  3. Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
  4. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
  5. Darwazeh, A. N. (2017). A new revision of the [revised] Bloom’s Taxonomy. Distance Learning, 14(3), 13-28.
  6. Köksal, D., & Ulum, Ö. G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 76-88.
  7. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  8. Ordem, E. (2017a). Developing critical-thinking dispositions in a listening/speaking class. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 50-55.10.5539/elt.v10n1p50
  9. Ordem, E. (2017b). A longitudinal study of motivation in foreign and second language learning context. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 334-341.10.5539/jel.v6n2p334
  10. Ordem, E. (2017c). A language teacher’s reflection on maladaptive immunity, possible selves and motivation. International Education Studies, 10(9), 1-8.10.5539/ies.v10n9p1
  11. Ordem, E. (2021). Participatory action research in a listening-speaking class in second language teaching: Towards a critical syllabus. Educational Action Research, 51(4) 1-17.10.1080/09650792.2021.1898431
  12. Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Highett, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow Education.
  13. Tarlinton, D. (2003). Bloom‘s Revised Taxonomy. Pupil Free Day. Australia, Apresentação: Kurwongbah State School. Retrieved from: www.kurwongbss.eq.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/bloomspres.ppt
  14. Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for Success 4 Reading and Writing. Qualitative Report, 21(9).10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2172
  15. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  16. Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl-Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved from: https://thesecondprinciple.com/essential-teaching-skills/blooms-taxonomy-revised/
  17. Zareian, G., Davoudi, M., Heshmatifar, Z., & Rahimi, J. (2015). An evaluation of questions in two ESP coursebooks based on Bloom’s new taxonomy of cognitive learning domain. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(8), 313-326.
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 146
Submitted on: May 4, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 27, 2023
Published on: Feb 15, 2023
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2023 Dinçay Köksal, Ömer Gökhan Ulum, Nurcihan Yürük, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.