Extension Experts‘ Intentions to use Precision Agricultural Technologies, a Test with the Technology Acceptance Model

Bagheri, Asghar; Tarighi, Javad; Emami, Naier; Szymanek, Mariusz

doi:10.2478/ata-2024-0012

Abstract

Precision agriculture (PA) is a farm management strategy that relies on various technologies to improve the productivity and sustainability of farming operations. The adoption of PA entails on-farm and off-farm benefits; however, the adoption rates remain low in Iran. Using the socio-psychological framework of the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study examined agricultural extension experts‘ intentions to use precision agricultural technologies (PATs) in Ardabil province, Iran. Structural equation modelling (SEM-PLS) was used to map the components of the TAM (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes toward PATs). All the components of the TAM showed a significant effect on experts‘ intentions, confirming the importance of socio-psychological variables in predicting agricultural experts‘ decision to apply PATs. Experts perceived PATs as helpful and relatively easy to use. In addition, they had positive attitudes toward PATs and intended to use most PA technologies. The TAM posits that two attitudinal components of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) determine acceptance and use. PU is the degree to which one believes using technology would enhance job performance, while PEU is the degree to which using technology is free of effort. The results showed that PEU and PU had a positive impact on attitudes. The three constructs positively affected behavioural intention toward the application of PATs and explained 68.8% of the variance of this construct. Due to the novelty of PA in the country, PEU was the most critical determinant of intention.

References

ADNAN, N. – NORDIN, S. M. – BIN ABU BAKAR, Z. 2017. Understanding and facilitating sustainable agricultural practice: A comprehensive analysis of adoption behaviour among Malaysian paddy farmers. In Land Use Policy, vol. 68, pp. 372–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.046
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ADRIAN, A. M. – NORWOOD, S. H. – MASK, P. L. 2005. Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. In Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 256–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
AHMADI, K. – EBADZADEH, H. – ABDSHAH, H. – KAZEMIAN, A. – RAFIEI, M. 2017. Agricultural statistics for the crop year 2015–2016. The first volume: Crops: Ministry of Jihad and Agriculture, Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
AJZEN, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
AMMANN, J. – UMSTÄTTER, C. – EL BENNI, N. 2022. The adoption of precision agriculture enabling technologies in Swiss outdoor vegetable production: A Delphi study. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 23, pp. 1354–1374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09889-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ANSARI, N. – REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – FATEMI, M. 2019. Viewpoints of experts of agricultural jihad centers toward the agricultural extension: New approach in Fars Province. In European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–410.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
AUBERT, B. A. – SCHROEDER, A. – GRIMAUDO, J. 2012. IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers’ adoption decision of precision agriculture technology. In Decision support systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 510–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BAGHERI, A. – BONDORI, A. – ALLAHYARI, M. S. – SURUJLAL, J. 2021. Use of biologic inputs among cereal farmers: Application of technology acceptance model. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, pp. 5165–5181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00808-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BARNES, A. P. – SOTO, I. – EORY, V. – BECK, B. – BALAFOUTIS, A. – SÁNCHEZ, B. – VANGEYTE, J. – FOUNTAS, S. – VAN DER WAL, T. – GÓMEZ-BARBERO, M. 2019. Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers. In Land Use Policy, vol. 80, pp. 163–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BORGES, J. A. R. – LANSINK, A. G. J. M. O. 2016. Identifying psychological factors that determine cattle farmers’ intention to use improved natural grassland. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 89–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CLARK, L. A. – WATSON, D. 1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. In Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DAVIS, F. D. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 475–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DAVIS, F. D. – BAGOZZI, R. P. – WARSHAW, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. In Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DAVIS, F. D. – VENKATESH, V. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EDWARDS-JONES, G. 2006. Modelling farmer decision-making: Concepts, progress and challenges. In Animal Science, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 783–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ASC2006112
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FAR, S. T. – REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. 2017. Determinants of Iranian agricultural consultants’ intentions toward precision agriculture: Integrating innovativeness to the technology acceptance model. In Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 280–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.09.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FLETT, R. – ALPASS, F. – HUMPHRIES, S. – MASSEY, C. – MORRISS, S. – LONG, N. 2004. The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming. In Agricultural Systems, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 199–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FLORESS, K. – DE JALÓN, S. G. – CHURCH, S. P. – BABIN, N. – ULRICHSCHAD, J. D. – PROKOPY, L. S. 2017. Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: Dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 73–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FORNELL, C. – LARCKER, D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 382–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FU, J.-R. – FARN, C.-K. – CHAO, W.-P. 2006. Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. In Information and Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 109–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GANDORFER, M. – SCHLEICHER, S. – ERDLE, K. 2018. Barriers to adoption of smart farming technologies in Germany. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Monticello, IL : International Society of Precision Agriculture, pp. 1–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GRANIĆ, A. – MARANGUNIĆ, N. 2019. Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. In British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HENSELER, J. – RINGLE, C. M. – SARSTEDT, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. In Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, pp. 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HENSELER, J. – SARSTEDT, M. 2013. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. In Computational Statistics, vol. 28, pp. 565–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ISPA. 2018. Precision agriculture definition. Available at: https://www.ispag.org/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
JAFARI, N. – KARAMI, E. A. – KESHAVARZ, M. 2020. The impacts of the new agricultural extension system on improving knowledge and changing the behavior of farmers in Fars Province. In Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/IAEEJ.2020.243857.1551 (In Persian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
JOKAR, N. K. – NOORHOSSEINI, S. A. – ALLAHYARI, M. S. – DAMALAS, C. A. 2017. Consumers’ acceptance of medicinal herbs: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). In Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 207, pp. 203–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KOLADY, D. E. – VAN DER SLUIS, E. – UDDIN, M. M. – DEUTZ, A. P. 2021. Determinants of adoption and adoption intensity of precision agriculture technologies: Evidence from South Dakota. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 22, pp. 689–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09750-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KOUFARIS, M. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. In Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 205–223.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LEE, Y. – KOZAR, K. A. – LARSEN, K. R. T. 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. In Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MACKENZIE, S. B. – PODSAKOFF, P. M. – JARVIS, C. B. 2005. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. In Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 710–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MCBRIDE, W. D. – DABERKOW, S. G. 2003. Information and the adoption of precision farming technologies. In Journal of Agribusiness, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.14671
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALJAAFREH, A. – ELZAGZOUG, E. Y. – ABUKHAIT, J. – SOLIMAN, A.-H. – ALJA’AFREH, S. S. – SIVANATHAN, A. – HUGHES, J. 2023. A real-time olive fruit detection for harvesting robot based on Yolo algorithms. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 121–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MILLS, J. – GASKELL, P. – INGRAM, J. – DWYER, J. – REED, M. – SHORT, C. 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. In Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 34, pp. 283–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MUN, Y. Y. – JACKSON, J. D. – PARK, J. S. – PROBST, J. C. 2006. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. In Information & Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 350–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PATHAK, H. S. – BROWN, P. – BEST, T. 2019. A systematic literature review of the factors affecting the precision agriculture adoption process. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 20, pp. 1292–1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09653-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PAUSTIAN, M. – THEUVSEN, L. 2017. Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 18, pp. 701–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9482-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
REICHARDT, M. – JÜRGENS, C. 2009. Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: Results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups. In Precision Agriculture, vol. 10, pp. 73–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9101-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – FATEMI, M. 2019. Strategies for improvement of agricultural extension new approach of Iran. In Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, vol. 15 no. 2, pp. 112–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/IAEEJ.2020.199832.1450
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
REZAEI-MOGHADDAM, K. – SALEHI, S. 2010. Agricultural specialists’ intention toward precision agriculture technologies: Integrating innovation characteristics to technology acceptance model. In African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1191–1199.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ROGERS, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York : Free Press, 512 pp. ISBN 0029266505.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RÖLING, N. – PRETTY, J. N. 1997. Chapter 20 Extension’s role in sustainable agricultural development. In SWANSON, B. E. – BENTZ, R. P. – SOFRANKO, A. J. (eds). Improving Agricultural Extension: A reference Manual. Rome, Italy : FAO, pp. 181–192. ISBN 92-5-104007-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHUKAT, S. – HEISE, H. 2021. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intentions and actual use of smart products among German farmers. In Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, article no. 6666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126666
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SILVA, A. G. – CANAVARI, M. – SIDALI, K. L. 2017. A technology acceptance model of common bean growers’ intention to adopt integrated production in the Brazilian Central Region. In Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 131–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/boku-2017-0012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TEO, T. S. H. – SRIVASTAVA, S. C.– JIANG, L. 2008. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. In Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 99–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VECCHIO, Y. – AGNUSDEI, G. P. – MIGLIETTA, P. P. – CAPITANIO, F. 2020. Adoption of precision farming tools: The case of Italian farmers. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, article no. 869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030869
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VENKATESH, V. – DAVIS, F. D. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. In Decision Sciences, vol. 27 no. 3, pp. 451–481.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VENKATESH, V. – MORRIS, M. G. – DAVIS, G. B. – DAVIS, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. In MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WETZELS, M. – ODEKERKEN-SCHRÖDER, G. – VAN OPPEN, C. 2009. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. In MIS Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 177–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WU, J.-H. – WANG, S.-C. 2005. What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. In Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 719–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WU, W. W. 2010. Linking Bayesian networks and PLS path modeling for causal analysis. In Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 134–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Extension Experts‘ Intentions to use Precision Agricultural Technologies, a Test with the Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

Paradigm

My account