Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Second Earth Orientation Parameters Prediction Comparison Campaign (2nd EOP PCC): Overview Cover

Second Earth Orientation Parameters Prediction Comparison Campaign (2nd EOP PCC): Overview

Open Access
|Jan 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Deadlines and milestones of the 2nd EOP PCC: blue – preparation phase, green – pre-operational phase (test phase), and red – operational phase
Deadlines and milestones of the 2nd EOP PCC: blue – preparation phase, green – pre-operational phase (test phase), and red – operational phase

Figure 2.

Input data used by participants to make the predictions
Input data used by participants to make the predictions

Figure 3.

Methods used by participants to make the predictions
Methods used by participants to make the predictions

Figure 4.

Times of submitting EOP forecasts by participants to the campaign Office
Times of submitting EOP forecasts by participants to the campaign Office

Figure 5.

Prediction horizons used by participants in the forecasts and the number of methods in which a given forecast horizon is exploited
Prediction horizons used by participants in the forecasts and the number of methods in which a given forecast horizon is exploited

Figure 6.

Differences between C04 and: IVS rapid, ILRS, IGS rapid, IGS final, Bulletin A, and SPACE solutions for x pole (a-c) and y pole (d-f). Note that for better visibility, the scale on y axis varies depending on the solution
Differences between C04 and: IVS rapid, ILRS, IGS rapid, IGS final, Bulletin A, and SPACE solutions for x pole (a-c) and y pole (d-f). Note that for better visibility, the scale on y axis varies depending on the solution

Figure 7.

Differences between C04 and IVS rapid, ILRS, IGS rapid, IGS final, and SPACE solutions for LoD (a-c); differences between C04 and IVS rapid, IGS rapid, IGS final, Bulletin A, and SPACE solutions for UT1-UTC (d-f). Note that for better visibility, the scale on y axis varies depending on the solution
Differences between C04 and IVS rapid, ILRS, IGS rapid, IGS final, and SPACE solutions for LoD (a-c); differences between C04 and IVS rapid, IGS rapid, IGS final, Bulletin A, and SPACE solutions for UT1-UTC (d-f). Note that for better visibility, the scale on y axis varies depending on the solution

Figure 8.

Differences between C04 and: USNO, GSFC, and IVS rapid solutions for dX (a-c), dY (d-f) components of precession-nutation
Differences between C04 and: USNO, GSFC, and IVS rapid solutions for dX (a-c), dY (d-f) components of precession-nutation

Figure 9.

Differences between C04 and USNO, GSFC, and IVS rapid solutions for dPsi (a-c), dEpsilon (d-f) components of precession-nutation
Differences between C04 and USNO, GSFC, and IVS rapid solutions for dPsi (a-c), dEpsilon (d-f) components of precession-nutation

Number of predictions submitted to the Office (as of February 9, 2022) with respect to the number of participants and the number of IDs

x poley poleUT1-UTCLoDdPsidEpsdXdYTotal
Total number of predictions49749744234841411421422150
Number of participants16161510226619
Number of IDs25252117227738

Details on EOP reference solutions compared in this study

SolutionStarting dateProvided EOPProvider
C041 January 1962x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoD, dX, dY, dPsi, dEpsThe Earth Orientation Center of the IERS (Bizouard et al. 2019)
SPACE19 July 1993x pole, y pole, UT1-UTCJPL (Ratcliff and Gross 2019)
Bulletin A1 September 1996x pole, y pole, UT1-UTCIERS Rapid Service Prediction Centre (Wooden and Gambis 2004)
ILRS28 December 1997x pole, y pole, LoDILRS (Sciarletta et al. 2010)
IGS rapid30 June 1996x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoDIGS (Kouba and Mireault 1998)
IGS final30 June 1996x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoDIGS (Kouba and Mireault 1998)
IVS rapid4 January 2002x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoD, dX, dY, dPsi, dEpsIVS BKG/DGFI Combination Center (Malkin 2001)
GSFC4 August 1979x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoD, dX, dY, dPsi, dEpsNASA GSFC (Technical description of solution gsf2014a, https://hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/series/operational/gsfc_r.txt – accessed on 13 September 2022)
USNO4 August 1979x pole, y pole, UT1-UTC, LoD, dX, dY, dPsi, dEpsUSNO (Technical description of solution usn2015a, https://hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/series/operational/usno_r.txt – accessed on 13 September 2022)

Root mean square (RMS), mean, minimum, and maximum of differences between C04 and: USNO, GSFC, and IVS rapid solutions for dX, dY and dPsi, dEps components of precession-nutation

SolutionRMSMeanMinMax
dX (mas)dY (mas)dX (mas)dY (mas)dX (mas)dY (mas)dX (mas)dY (mas)
C04 – USNO0.1780.117−0.0010.018−0.913−0.4552.9521.658
C04 – GSFC0.1140.146−0.0340.027−0.885-1.2620.9462.002
C04 – IVS rapid0.0180.0080.0010.000−0.231−0.0550.1590.076
SolutiondPsi (mas)dEps (mas)dPsi (mas)dEps (mas)dPsi (mas)dEps (mas)dPsi (mas)dEps (mas)
C04 – USNO0.1300.1390.010−0.031−0.466−0.6421.6081.086
C04 – GSFC0.1350.181−0.019−0.024−0.878−1.2970.9541.965
C04 – IVS rapid0.0780.1170.009−0.008−0.414−0.6340.4400.498

Root mean square (RMS), mean, minimum, and maximum of differences between C04 and ILRS, SPACE, IGS rapid, IGS final, IVS rapid, and Bulletin A solutions for LoD and UT1-UTC

SolutionLoDUT1-UTC
RMS (ms)Mean (ms)Min (ms)Max (ms)RMS (ms)Mean (ms)Min (ms)Max (ms)
C04 – ILRS0.0350.000−0.0770.290××××
C04 – SPACE0.015−0.001−0.0540.0500.019−0.005−0.1130.082
C04 – IGS rapid0.0110.000−0.0390.0340.051−0.008−0.1670.153
C04 – IGS final0.010−0.001−0.0370.0280.043−0.006−0.1470.140
C04 – IVS rapid0.098−0.005−0.3910.5020.212−0.001−1.0350.744
C04 – Bulletin A××××0.020−0.004−0.1100.087

Details on the 1st and 2nd EOP PCC participants and methods

1st EOP PCC2nd EOP PCC
Number of registered participants (institutes or groups of institutes)1319
Number of institutes1024
Number of countries of participants origin78
Total number of all teams membersNo data58
Number of registered prediction methods (IDs)20 (+1 combined prediction series)38
Number of active participants1116

Root mean square (RMS), mean, minimum, and maximum of differences between C04 and Bulletin A, SPACE, IGS rapid, IGS final, ILRS, and IVS rapid solutions for x pole and y pole

SolutionRMSMeanMinMax
x pole (mas)y pole (mas)x pole (mas)y pole (mas)x pole (mas)y pole (mas)x pole (mas)y pole (mas)
C04 – Bulletin A0.0520.0450.0010.001−0.312−0.2420.1520.139
C04 – SPACE0.0660.0510.035−0.025−0.307−0.2280.2140.122
C04 – IGS rapid0.0840.0700.006−0.001−0.413−0.2570.2470.254
C04 – IGS final0.0800.0650.0010.000−0.419−0.2540.2270.194
C04 – ILRS0.2140.241−0.050−0.116−1.656−0.7720.6000.673
C04 – IVS rapid0.3600.2990.0280.139-1.441-1.1442.2681.263
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2022-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2083-6104 | Journal ISSN: 1509-3859
Language: English
Page range: 237 - 253
Submitted on: Jun 14, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 17, 2022
Published on: Jan 5, 2023
Published by: Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Justyna Śliwińska, Tomasz Kur, Małgorzata Wińska, Jolanta Nastula, Henryk Dobslaw, Aleksander Partyka, published by Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.