Investigation of Signals of the Range 10−3–10−4 Hz Registered by Water-Tube Tiltmeters in the Underground Geodynamic Laboratory in Książ (Sw Poland)

Kaczorowski, Marek; Kasza, Damian; Zdunek, Ryszard; Wronowski, Roman

doi:10.2478/arsa-2022-0011

Figure 1.

Plan of the underground of the Geodynamic Laboratory in Książ

Figure 2.

Block diagram of the water-tube tiltmeter measure platform

Figure 3.

View of the elements of a barrier section of the water-tube tiltmeter pipe

Figure 4.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10 −3–10 −4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 1

Figure 5.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 2

Figure 6.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 3

Figure 7.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 4

Figure 8.

Results of the Fourier analyses of the signals of the period ranging 10–100 min in the data period from December 15 to 28, 2004, as registered in Channel No. 02

Figure 9.

Variability of amplitudes of signals of the period range 10–100 min in the period of December 15–28 in Channel No. 02

Figure 10.

Signal of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 01 in March 2011

Figure 11.

Results of the Fourier analyses of signals in the period range 10–100 min in the period from February 26 to March 16, 2011, registered in the WT Channel No. 04

Figure 12.

Plots of the average amplitude function of the signals of the period range 10–100 min from before and after the Japanese earthquake

Figure 13.

Small and large amplitude signals of the atmospheric microvibrations observed in Channel No. 01 in the period from June 6 to 21, 2010

Figure 14.

The epochs of observations which contain signals of large and small amplitudes of the atmospheric microvibrations and results of spectral analyses of signals from the epoch preceding period of strong atmospheric microvibrations in March 2012 on Channel No. 01 (plot A)

Figure 15.

The results of spectral analyses for weak and strong signals from June 18 to 20, 2010

Figure 16.

Overlapped results of 80 spectral analyses of 3-week-long data series in the epoch of strong infrasound signals in the period from February 2 to March 3, 2012

Figure 1S, plot A.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot B.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot C.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot D.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot E.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10–3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 2S.

Variability of amplitudes of the signals in the period range 10–100 min in Channel No. 02 in the time periods of 53–58 min in December 2004

Figure 3S.

Variability of amplitudes of the signals in the period range 10–100 min on Channel No. 03 in the period of 36–42 min in December 2004

Figure 4S.

Signal of the range 10 −3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 02 in March 2011

Figure 5S.

Signal of the range 10 −3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 03 in March 2011

Figure 6S.

Signal of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 04 in March 2011

Figure 1.

Plan of the underground of the Geodynamic Laboratory in Książ

Figure 2.

Block diagram of the water-tube tiltmeter measure platform

Figure 3.

View of the elements of a barrier section of the water-tube tiltmeter pipe

Figure 4.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10 −3–10 −4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 1

Figure 5.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 2

Figure 6.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 3

Figure 7.

The plot of 2-week-long signals of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz in the time period from December 15 to December 28, 2004 in Channel No. 4

Figure 8.

Results of the Fourier analyses of the signals of the period ranging 10–100 min in the data period from December 15 to 28, 2004, as registered in Channel No. 02

Figure 9.

Variability of amplitudes of signals of the period range 10–100 min in the period of December 15–28 in Channel No. 02

Figure 10.

Signal of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 01 in March 2011

Figure 11.

Results of the Fourier analyses of signals in the period range 10–100 min in the period from February 26 to March 16, 2011, registered in the WT Channel No. 04

Figure 12.

Plots of the average amplitude function of the signals of the period range 10–100 min from before and after the Japanese earthquake

Figure 13.

Small and large amplitude signals of the atmospheric microvibrations observed in Channel No. 01 in the period from June 6 to 21, 2010

Figure 14.

The epochs of observations which contain signals of large and small amplitudes of the atmospheric microvibrations and results of spectral analyses of signals from the epoch preceding period of strong atmospheric microvibrations in March 2012 on Channel No. 01 (plot A)

Figure 15.

The results of spectral analyses for weak and strong signals from June 18 to 20, 2010

Figure 16.

Overlapped results of 80 spectral analyses of 3-week-long data series in the epoch of strong infrasound signals in the period from February 2 to March 3, 2012

Figure 1S, plot A.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot B.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot C.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot D.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10−3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 1S, plot E.

Detailed plot of the signals in the range 10–3–10−4 Hz observed in Channel No. 02 before, during, and after the earthquakes

Figure 2S.

Variability of amplitudes of the signals in the period range 10–100 min in Channel No. 02 in the time periods of 53–58 min in December 2004

Figure 3S.

Variability of amplitudes of the signals in the period range 10–100 min on Channel No. 03 in the period of 36–42 min in December 2004

Figure 4S.

Signal of the range 10 −3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 02 in March 2011

Figure 5S.

Signal of the range 10 −3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 03 in March 2011

Figure 6S.

Signal of the range 10−3–10−4 Hz registered by the WTs in Channel No. 04 in March 2011

Investigation of Signals of the Range 10−3–10−4 Hz Registered by Water-Tube Tiltmeters in the Underground Geodynamic Laboratory in Książ (Sw Poland)

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

Figure 16.

Figure 1S, plot A.

Figure 1S, plot B.

Figure 1S, plot C.

Figure 1S, plot D.

Figure 1S, plot E.

Figure 2S.

Figure 3S.

Figure 4S.

Figure 5S.

Figure 6S.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

Figure 16.

Figure 1S, plot A.

Figure 1S, plot B.

Figure 1S, plot C.

Figure 1S, plot D.

Figure 1S, plot E.

Figure 2S.

Figure 3S.

Figure 4S.

Figure 5S.

Figure 6S.