
Figure 1.
FESEM view of (A) Control primer at a magnification of X 1000; (B) nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer with a concentration of 30% nCaF2 at a magnification of X 80; and (C) nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer with a concentration of 30% nCaF2 at a magnification of X 1000.

Figure 2.
(A) and (B) Mean fluoride ion released from control, 20%, 30%, and 40% nCaF22-containing orthodontic primer.
Table I.
Mean, standard deviation, and range (minimum - maximum) of the fluoride ion releases for each group
| Control | 20% nCaF2 | 30% naFC2 | 40% nCaF2 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max | |
| Day 1 | 0.019 | 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.066 | 0.010 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 1.329 | 0.206 | 1.10 | 1.60 | 1.971 | 0.1 1 1 | 1.80 | 2.10 |
| Day 2 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.041 | 0.009 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.869 | 0.385 | 0.90 | 1.10 | 1.086 | 0.107 | 1.00 | 1.30 |
| Day 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.083 | 0.018 | 0.06 | 0.1 1 | 0.120 | 0.022 | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| Day 4 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.036 | 0.024 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.051 | 0.042 | 0.00 | 0.1 1 |
| Day 5 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.043 | 0.035 | 0.00 | 0.09 |
| Day 6 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.026 | 0.025 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| Day 7 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.021 | 0.015 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Day 8 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.026 | 0.008 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Day 9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.017 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Day 1 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Day 1 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 1 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Day 12 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Day 1 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.019 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Day 14 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.019 | 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
Table II.
Kruskal Wallis ANOVA test results for differences of mean fluoride ion released between the four groups
Table III.
Friedman ANOVA test results for pairwise differences in the mean fluoride ion released between the four groups
| 95% Confidence interval | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean difference | Std error | p-value | Lower bound | Upper bound |
| Control | |||||
| 20% | -0.0153 | 0.00091 | 0.000* | -0.0184 | -0.0122 |
| 30% | -0.1701 | 0.01094 | 0.000* | -0.2102 | -0.1300 |
| 40% | -0.2439 | 0.00766 | 0.000* | -0.2719 | -0.2158 |
| 20% | |||||
| Control | 0.0153 | 0.00091 | 0.000* | 0.0122 | 0.0184 |
| 30% | -0.1548 | 0.01097 | 0.000* | -0.1948 | -0.1148 |
| 40% | -0.2286 | 0.00770 | 0.000* | -0.2565 | -0.2006 |
| 30% | |||||
| Control | 0.1701 | 0.01094 | 0.000* | 0.1300 | 0.2102 |
| 20% | 0.1548 | 0.01097 | 0.000* | 0.1148 | 0.1948 |
| 40% | -0.0738 | 0.01335 | 0.001* | -0.1159 | -0.0317 |
| 40% | |||||
| Control | 0.2439 | 0.00766 | 0.000* | 0.2158 | 0.2719 |
| 20% | 0.2286 | 0.00770 | 0.000* | 0.2006 | 0.2565 |
| 30% | 0.0738 | 0.01335 | 0.001* | 0.0317 | 0.1159 |
Table IV.
Mean, standard deviation, and range (minimum – maximum) of shear bond strength
| Group | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.50 | 2.08 | 7.15 | 13.11 |
| 20% | 10.70 | 3.00 | 7.65 | 16.28 |
| 30% | 9.61 | 1.74 | 6.59 | 12.50 |
| 40% | 5.44 | 3.72 | 1.95 | 11.93 |
Table V.
Post-hoc pairwise comparison of shear bond strength
| Group | Mean difference | p | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
| Control | ||||
| 20% | -1.20 | 0.845 | -5.249 | 2.848 |
| 30% | -0.11 | 1.000 | -4.161 | 3.935 |
| 40% | 4.06* | 0.049 | 0.015 | 8.111 |
| 20% | ||||
| Control | 1.20 | 0.845 | -2.848 | 5.249 |
| 30% | 1.09 | 0.880 | -2.961 | 5.135 |
| 40% | 5.26* | 0.008 | 1.216 | 9.312 |
| 30% | ||||
| Control | 0.11 | 1.000 | -3.935 | 4.161 |
| 20% | -1.09 | 0.880 | -5.135 | 2.961 |
| 40% | 4.18* | 0.041 | 0.128 | 8.225 |
| 40% | ||||
| Control | -4.06* | 0.049 | -8.111 | -0.015 |
| 20% | -5.26* | 0.008 | -9.312 | -1.216 |
| 30% | -4.18* | 0.041 | -8.225 | -0.128 |
Table VI.
Frequency of adhesive remnant index scores between groups
| Frequency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Control | 1 (100.0%) | 2 (14.29%) | 4 (40.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 20% | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (28.57%) | 2 (20.0%) | 1 (33.33%) |
| 30% | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (14.29%) | 3 (30.0%) | 2 (66.67%) |
| 40% | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (42.86%) | 1 (10.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Supplementary I.
Shapiro–Wilk test results for Group A (Control/0% nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer)
Supplementary II.
Shapiro-Wilk test results for Group B (20% nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer)
Supplementary III.
Shapiro–Wilk test results for Group C (30% nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer)
Supplementary IV.
Shapiro-Wilk test results for Group D (40% nCaF2-containing orthodontic primer)