A national survey of the debonding protocols used by orthodontists in New Zealand
By:
References
- Newman GV, Facq JM. The effects of adhesive systems on tooth surfaces. Am J Orthod 1971;59:67–75.
- Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L. Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: clinical application. Am J Orthod 1977;71:651–65.
- Zachrisson BU. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173–89.
- Zachrisson BU, Årthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;75:121–37.
- Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 1995;65:103–10.
- Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Fraticelli D, Roncallo S, Gandini P. Epidemiological survey of different clinical techniques of orthodontic bracket debonding and enamel polishing. J Orthod Sci 2015;4:123–7.
- Webb BJ, Koch J, Hagan JL, Ballard RW, Armbruster PC. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols. J Orthod 2016;43:39–46.
- Barreto LLM, Almeida SA, Machado FC, Vitral RWF, Campos M. Evaluation of orthodontists’ attitudes and practices regarding residual resin removal methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2024;29:e242402.
- Pithon MM, Santos Fonseca Figueiredo D, Oliveira DD, Coqueiro RdS. What is the best method for debonding metallic brackets from the patient’s perspective? Prog Orthod 2015;16:17.
- Almuzian M, Rizk MZ, Ulhaq A, Alharbi F, Alomari S, Mohammed H. Effectiveness of different debonding techniques and adjunctive methods on pain and discomfort perception during debonding fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2019;41:486–94.
- Khalil AS, Tamish NM, Elkalza AR. Assessment of chemical, ultrasonic, diode laser, and Er:YAG laser application on debonding of ceramic brackets. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:79.
- Uzunçıbuk H, Öztaş SE. In vitro evaluation of the effects of different chemical solvent agents on shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Turk J Orthod 2023;36:54–61.
- Knösel M, Mattysek S, Jung K, Sadat-Khonsari R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Bauss O, et al. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding: Extent of enamel damage, adhesive residues and the need for postprocessing. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1036–44.
- Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B. Enamel surface roughness after debonding: Comparison of two different burs. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:1081–8.
- Özer T, Başaran G, Kama JD. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:368–74.
- Cesur E, Arslan C, Orhan AI, Bilecenoğlu B, Orhan K. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding. J Orofacial Orthop/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2022;83:157–71.
- Ghaleb L, Al-Worafi NA, Thawaba A, Abdulqader AA, Alkamel A, Abdo Y, et al. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:358.
- Howell S, Weekes WT. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aust Dental J 1990;35:245–52.
- Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:515–30.
- Uysal T, Eldeniz AU, Usumez S, Usumez A. Thermal changes in the pulp chamber during different adhesive clean-up procedures. Angle Orthod 2005;75:220–5.
- Kley P, Frentzen M, Küpper K, Braun A, Kecsmar S, Jäger A, et al. Thermotransduction and heat stress in dental structures during orthodontic debonding. J Orofacial Orthop/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2016;77:185–93.
- Lai C, Bush PJ, Warunek S, Covell DA Jr, Al-Jewair T. An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding. Angle Orthod 2019;89:438–45.
- Albertini P, Tauro R, Barbara L, Albertini E, Lombardo L. Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study. Prog Orthod 2022;23:16.
- Baumann DF, Brauchli L, Van Waes H. The influence of dental loupes on the quality of adhesive removal in orthodontic debonding. J Orofacial Orthop/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2011;72:125–32.
- Mohebi S, Shafiee H-A, Ameli N. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:521–7.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2024
Published on: Feb 5, 2025
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2025 TianYou Wu, Mauro Farella, Simon Guan, Richard D. Cannon, Li Mei, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.