References
- Li M, Shen S. The application of a fully digital approach in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a preliminary study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:237.
- Luciana M. Orthodontic camouflage as a treatment alternative for skeletal Class III. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021;26: e21bbo4.
- Martin C, Celis B, Ambrosio N. Effect of orthodontic therapy in periodontitis and non-periodontitis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2022; 24:72–101.
- Erbe C, Heger S. Orthodontic treatment in periodontally compromised patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:79–89.
- Ngan P, Moon W. Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148: 22–36.
- Meyns J, Brasil DM. The clinical outcome of skeletal anchorage in interceptive treatment (in growing patients) for class III malocclusion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47:1003–10.
- Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:28.
- Nakamura M, Kawanabe N, Kataoka T, Murakami T, Yamashiro T, Kamioka H. Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151:1116–24.
- Dixit S, Shyagali TR. Evaluation of the correlation between facial index and the cortical bone thickness of the maxilla and mandible—a computer tomography based study. Arch Oral Biol. 2023;146:105606.
- Valerio CS, Cardoso CAEA, Araújo EA, Zenóbio EG, Manzi FR. Bone changes in the mandibular incisors after orthodontic correction of dental crowding without extraction: a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021;51:155–65
- Maged S, Abeer A. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:6443–55.
- Bellot-Arcís C, García-Sanz V. Nonsurgical treatment of an adult with skeletal Class III malocclusion, anterior crossbite, and an impacted canine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2021;159:522–35.
- Lee YS, Park JH. Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162:520–8.
- Joung-Lin J, Park JH. An interdisciplinary approach to orthodontic treatment of a mutilated Class III malocclusion with mini-implants, dental implants, and an autotransplant. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:281–96.
- Bellot-Arcís C, Ferrando-Magrane E. Nonsurgical treatment of an adult with skeletal Class III malocclusion, posterior crossbite and mandibular asymmetry. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15: e978–e983.
- Li XB, Tian Y. Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. Peer J. 2024; 12: e17733.
- Qi J, Matsumoto Y. Prevention of bone dehiscence associated with orthodontic tooth movement by prophylactic injection of bone anabolic agents in mice. Sci Rep. 2024;14:15749.
- Alsulaimani L, Alqarni H. The orthodontics-periodontics challenges in integrated treatment: a comprehensive review. Cureus. 2023;15: e38994.
- Sendyk M, Cevidanes LHS. Three-dimensional evaluation of dental decompensation and mandibular symphysis remodeling on orthodontic-surgical treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159:175–83.e3.
- Chae JM, Park JH, Kojima Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the mandibular dentition: a finite element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:388–97.
- Park M, Na Y, Park M, et al. Biomechanical analysis of distalization of mandibular molars by placing a mini-plate: a finite element study. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47:289–97.
- Kim YB, Bayome M, Park JH, Lim HJ, Mo SS, Lee NK, et al. Displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to locations and types of TSADs: 3D Finite element analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:46–52.s
- Sung EH, Kim SJ, Chun YS, Park YC, Yu HS, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:20–8.
- Zeng Y, Xiao L, Yuan X. Displacement and stress distribution of mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment in the presence of alveolar bone loss under occlusal loads: a finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161: e456–65.
- Hedayati Z, Shomali M. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of miniscrew: a 3D finite element study. Prog Orthod 2016;17:31
- Coolidge E. The thickness of the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc 1937; 24:1260–7.
- Liu H, Wu X, Tan J, Li X. Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT. Prog Orthod. 2019; 20: 45–8.
- Lim WH, Lee SK, Wikesjö UM, Chun YS. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat. 2007; 20: 760–5.
- Ammar HH, Ngan P, Crout RJ, Mucino VH, Mukdadi OM. Three dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: 59–71.
- Gupta M, Madhok K. Determination of stress distribution on periodontal ligament and alveolar bone by various tooth movements—A 3D FEM study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10:758–63.
- Yeon BM, Lee NK. Comparison of treatment effects after total mandibular arch distalization with miniscrews vs ramal plates in patients with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:529–36.
- Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:745–51.
- JS K. Study of attached gingival width between healthy gingival and early gingivitis patients, in thesis. Seoul, Korea. Yonsei University; 1997.
- Aslan BI, Küçükkaraca E. Nonextraction treatment of a class III malocclusion case using mini-screw-assisted lower molar distalization. Turk J Orthod. 2019;32:119–24
- Kim SH, Cha KS. Mandibular skeletal posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization in patients with Class III malocclusion with different vertical facial patterns. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51:250–9.
- Park CO, Sa’aed NL, Bayome M, Park JH, Kook YA, Park YS. Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults. Korean J Orthod. 2017; 47:375–83.
- Rice AJ, Carrillo R. Do orthopedic corrections of growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients produce stable results? Angle Orthod. 2019;89:552–8.
- Nakamura A, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of mandibular molars moved distally with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132: 624–9.
- Chen G, Chen S, Zhang XY, et al. A new method to evaluate the positional stability of a self-drilling miniscrew. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18: 125–33.
- Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:428–33.
- Tuna M, Sunbuloglu E, Bozdag E. Finite element simulation of the behavior of the periodontal ligament: a validated nonlinear contact model. J Biomech. 2014;47:2883–90.