References
- Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23:40. e1–e10.
- Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;98:340–7.
- Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara Jr JA. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:599. e1–e12.
- Makhbul MZM, Hassan WNW. A clinical audit of the success rate of removable functional appliances treatment. Malaysian Dental J. 2019;61–73.
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119–29.
- Mills J. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:267–75.
- Franchi L, Pavoni C, Faltin Jr K, McNamara Jr JA, Cozza P. Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:334–40.
- Freeman DC, McNamara Jr JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Fränkel C. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:570. e1–e6.
- Malta LA, Baccetti T, Franchi L., Faltin Jr K, McNamara Jr JA. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:10–7.
- DeVincenzo JP. Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;99:241–57.
- Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:285–95.
- Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:418–34.
- Cacciatore G, Ugolini A, Sforza C, Gbinigie O, Plüddemann A. Long-term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0221624.
- Moro A, Mattos CF, Borges SW, Flores-Mir C, Topolski F. Stability of Class II corrections with removable and fixed functional appliances: a literature review. J World Federation Orthod. 2020;9:56–67.
- Flores-Mir C, Major PW. A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:586–93.
- Shen G, Hägg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible–removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8:2–10.
- O’brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124:128–37.
- Al-Moghrabi D, Salazar FC, Pandis N, Fleming PS. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;152:17–32.
- Pacha MM, Fleming PS, Johal A. A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:621–30.
- Ghafaria J, Shoferb F, Jacobsson-Hunta U, Markowitzc D, Lasterb L. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;113:51–61.
- El-Huni A, Salazar FBC, Sharma PK, Fleming PS. Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;155:173–81.
- O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124:234–43.
- Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-termdentofacial adaptations to treatment with the herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 1997;3:232–43.
- Tulloch JC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;113:62–74.
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Sixth edition, ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019:357–94.
- Livieratos FA, Johnston Jr LE. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:118–31.
- Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:481–9.
- Tulloch JC, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:391–400.
- Tulloch JC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:533–42.
- Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;113:40–50.
- O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Appelbe P, Davies L, Connolly I, et al. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:573–9.
- Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, D O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3.
- Tulloch JC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125:657–67.
- Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38:247–56.
- O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;124:488–94.
- Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison J, Worthington H, O’Brien K. Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: Results of a Cochrane systematic review. American Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148:47–59.
- Registrant Data - Dental Board of Australia: Dental Board AHPRA; 2024. Available from: https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/About-the-Board/Statistics.aspx
- Bahar AD, Kamarudin Y, Chadwick S. A national survey of orthodontists in Malaysia and their use of functional appliances for Class II malocclusions. Aust Orthod J. 2021;37:217–26.
- Chadwick S, Banks P, Wright J. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dental Update. 1998;25:302–8.
- Annual Report. Australian Society of Orthodontists; 2023. Available from: https://www.aso.org.au