References
- Jamieson S. Likert scale [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 4]. Encyclopedia Britannica. Accessed October 31, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Likert-Scale.
- Mohammad Yusof N, Karuppiah K, Md Tamrin S, Rasdi I, Mohamad Jamil PAS. Likert Scale vs. Visual Analogue Scale on vehicle seat discomfort questionnaire: a review. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2019;15:159–65.
- Jamieson S. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ. 2004;38:1217–8.
- Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–36.
- McLeod A, Pippin S, Wong JA. Revisiting the Likert scale: can the fast form approach improve survey research. Int J Behav Accounting Finance. 2011;2:310.
- Maurer TJ, Pierce HR. A comparison of likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83:324–9.
- Taherdoost H. Designing a questionnaire for a research paper: a comprehensive guide to design and develop an effective questionnaire. Asian J Managerial Sci. 2022;11:8–16.
- Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2016;13:67–75.
- Rosas S, Paço M, Lemos C, Pinho T. Comparison between the Visual Analog Scale and the Numerical Rating Scale in the perception of esthetics and pain. Int Orthod. 2017;15:543–60.
- Alkadi L, Masuadi E, Mohamed TA, Mohamud M, Farook F. A Likert Scale Versus a Visual Analogue Scale and the participant response: a cross sectional study. J Int Dent Med Res. 2022;15:255–62.
- Vickers AJ. Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15:709–16.
- Akad K, Solmaz D, Sari I, Onen F, Akkoc N, Akar S. Performance of response scales of activity and functional measures of ankylosing spondylitis: numerical rating scale versus visual analog scale. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2617–23.
- Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, . A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest. 1999;116:1208–17.
- Ghasemi M, Sharifi R, Tahani B. Satisfaction with dental appearance and willingness to improve dental aesthetic among patients attending the dental school of Isfahan university of medical sciences. jdm. 2021;34:102–13.
- Dourado GB, Volpato GH, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Pedron Oltramari PV, Freire Fernandes TM, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC. Likert scale vs visual analog scale for assessing facial pleasantness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160:844–52.
- Hasson D, Arnetz BB. Validation and Findings Comparing VAS vs. Likert Scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2005;8:178–92.
- Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:S31–4.
- Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
- Hatch CD, Wehby GL, Nidey NL, Moreno Uribe LM. The effects of objective 3D measures of facial shape and symmetry on perceptions of facial attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1958.
- Aşik S, Kök H. Perception of dental midline deviation and smile attractiveness by eye-tracking and aesthetic ratings. Australasian Orthod J. 2021;37:187–96.
- Eslamipour F, Riahi FT, Etemadi M, Riahi A. Correlation coefficients of three self-perceived orthodontic treatment need indices. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017;14:37.
- Fudalej SA, Desmedt D, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS. Comparison of three methods of rating nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54:400–7.
- Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Data from a randomized trial. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:43–51.
- Kremer E, Hampton Atkinson J, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain. 1981;10:241–8.
- Phan NQ, Blome C, Fritz F, Gerss J, Reich A, Ebata T, . Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:502–7.
- Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.
- Van Laerhoven H, Van Der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Derkx BHF. A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children’s questionnaires. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:830–5.