References
- Murugesan A, Jain RK. A 3D comparison of dimension of infrazygomatic crest region in different vertical skeletal patterns: a retrospective study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(4):770–5.
- Al Amri MS, Sabban HM, Alsaggaf DH, Alsulaimani FF, Al-Turki GA, Al-Zahrani MS, Zawawi KH. Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal. Ann Saudi Med. 2020;40(4):330–7.
- Kim JH, Park, Young-Chel P. Evaluation of mandibular cortical bone thickness for placement of temporary anchorage devices. Korean J Orthod. 2012; 42(3); 110–7.
- Grünheid T, Schieck JR, Pliska BT, Ahmad M, Larson BE. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(4):436–43.
- Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):640–e1.
- Campobasso A, Battista G, Lo Muzio E, Lo Muzio L. The virtual patient in daily orthodontics: matching intraoral and facial scans without cone beam computed tomography. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(19):9870.
- Prasad AS, Sivakumar A. ATM technique-a novel radiographic technique to assess the position of buccal shelf implants. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2022;51(5):20210346.
- Bennemann R, Baxmann M, Keilig L, Reimann S, Braumann B, Bourauel C. Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography. J Orofacial Orthop/Fortschritte Kieferorthopädie. 2012;3(73):236–48.
- Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2007;104(4):551–9.
- Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(2):129–34.
- Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(1):112–6.
- Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):150–7.
- Damstra J, Fourie Z, Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):16–e1.
- Tatli U, Alraawi M, Toroğlu MS. Effects of size and insertion angle of orthodontic mini-implants on skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156(2):220–8.
- Laursen MG, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. An evaluation of insertion sites for mini-implants: a micro-CT study of human autopsy material. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(2):222–9.
- Migliorati, M, De Mari, A, Annarumma, F et al. Three-dimensional analysis of miniscrew position changes during bone-borne expansion in young and late adolescent patients. Prog Orthod. 2023; 24, 20.
- Chen MH, Chang JZ, Kok SH, Chen YJ, Huang YD, Cheng KY, Lin CP. Intraobserver reliability of landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized two-dimensional cephalograms versus conventional cephalometric radiography: a preliminary study. J Dental Sci. 2014;9(1):56–62.
- Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Lin JC. A computed tomographic image study on the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest of the maxilla and its clinical implications for miniscrew insertion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(3):352–6.
- Wilmes B, Su YY, Drescher D. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):1065–70.
- Uribe F, Mehr R, Mathur A, Janakiraman N, Allareddy V. Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region. Prog Orthod. 2015;16(1):1–6.
- Bennemann R, Baxmann M, Keilig L, Reimann S, Braumann B, Bourauel C. Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography. J Orofacial Orthop/Fortschritte Kieferorthopädie. 2012;3(73):236–48.
- Van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Swennen GR, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2009;38(7):773–8.
- Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2003;6:95–101.
- Ghafari GG. Posteroanterior cephalometry: craniofacial frontal analysis. In: Jacobson A, ed. Radiographic Cephalometry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2006:267–92.
- Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):51–60.
- Shokri A, Miresmaeili A, Farhadian N, Falah-Kooshki S, Amini P, Mollaie N. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017;46(5):20160180.
- Lee KM, Hwang HS, Cho JH. Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(4):715–9.