Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital lingual appliance combined with micro-screws for the treatment of a skeletal bimaxillary protrusion and ‘gummy’ smile Cover

Digital lingual appliance combined with micro-screws for the treatment of a skeletal bimaxillary protrusion and ‘gummy’ smile

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod 2005;75:333–9.
  2. Keating PJ. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features. Br J Orthod 1985;12:193–201.
  3. Fontinha C, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. How efficient is customized lingual orthodontics? An assessment of treatment outcome. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022;25:73–81.
  4. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:803–10.
  5. Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:129–41.
  6. Feng Y, Kong WD, Cen WJ, Zhou XZ, Zhang W, Li QT, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:210–9.
  7. Kojima Y, Kawamura J, Fukui H. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:501–8.
  8. Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2010;80:211–6.
  9. Kusnoto J, Kusnoto H. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:304–7.
  10. Mattu N, Virupaksha AM, Belludi A. Comparative study of effect of different lever arm positions and lengths on transverse and vertical bowing in lingual orthodontics—An FEM study. Int Orthod 2021;19:281–90.
  11. Inami T, Ito G, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Ribbon-wise customized lingual appliance and orthodontic anchor screw for the treatment of skeletal high-angle maxillary protrusion without bowing effect. Angle Orthod 2018;88:830–40.
  12. Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:433–43.
  13. Long H, Zhou Y, Pyakurel U, Liao L, Jian F, Xue J, et al. Comparison of adverse effects between lingual and labial orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2013;83:1066–73.
  14. Grauer D. Quality in orthodontics: the role of customized appliances. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:253–8.
  15. El Khoury T, Karam R, Dib E, Kaddah F, Mhanna A, Ghosn N, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the effects of sliding mechanics in labial and lingual orthodontics using the finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022;162: 24–32.
  16. Lawson RB. Extraction treatment in lingual orthodontics. J Orthod 2013;40 (Suppl 1): S38–48.
  17. Ghannam M, Kamiloglu B. Effects of skeletally supported anterior en masse retraction with varied lever arm lengths and locations in lingual orthodontic treatment: a 3D finite element study. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021:9975428.
  18. Inami T, Nakano Y, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Adult skeletal Class II high-angle case treated with a fully customized lingual bracket appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:679–91.
  19. Papageorgiou SN, Gölz L, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124: 105–18.
  20. Hong RK, Ahn JH. Correction of a gummy smile and lip protrusion by orthodontic retreatment with lingual appliances and temporary skeletal anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;160:603–16.
  21. Aras I, Tuncer AV. Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: root resorption and treatment efficiency. Angle Orthod 2016;86:746–52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 96 - 108
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2023
Published on: Mar 15, 2023
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2023 Yu Hua Chen, Yuan Gao, Jiao Jiao He, Shan Min Fu, Lei Wang, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.