References
- Malkoc S, Corekci B, Ulker HE, Yalçin M, Şengün A. Cytotoxic effects of orthodontic composites. Angle Orthod 2010;80:759–64.
- Mockers O, Deroze D, Camps J. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bands, brackets and archwires in vitro. Dent Mater 2002;18:311–7.
- Finke H, Koos B, Fischer-Brandies H, Es-Souni M. In vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrews with human gingival fibroblast and SAOS-2 osteoblast cultures. J Orofac Orthop 2018;79:328–36.
- Ihssen BA, Willmann JH, Nimer A, Drescher D. Effect of in vitro aging by water immersion and thermocycling on the mechanical properties of PETG aligner material. J Orofac Orthop 2019;80:292–303.
- Martina S, Rongo R, Bucci R, Razionale AV, Valletta R, D’Antò V. In vitro cytotoxicity of different thermoplastic materials for clear aligners. Angle Orthod 2019;89:942–5.
- ISO—ISO 10993-5:2009—Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. https://www.iso.org/ standard/36406.html. Accessed June 18, 2022.
- Vande Vannet B, Mohebbian N, Wehrbein H. Toxicity of used orthodontic archwires assessed by three-dimensional cell culture. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:426–32.
- Ahrari F, Tavakkol Afshari J, Poosti M, Brook A. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding adhesive resins on human oral fibroblasts. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:688–92.
- Longo-Sorbello GSA, Saydam G, Banerjee D, Bertino JRCelis CE. Cytotoxicity and cell growth assays. Cell biology:a laboratuary handbook Vol 1 Burlington: Elsevier Inc; 2006pp. 315–24.
- Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of cell viability by the MTT assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2018;2018: 469–71.
- Eliades T, Pratsinis H, Athanasiou AE, Eliades G, Kletsas D. Cytotoxicity and estrogenicity of Invisalign appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:100–3.
- Premaraj T, Simet S, Beatty M, Premaraj S. Oral epithelial cell reaction after exposure to Invisalign plastic material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:64–71.
- ZENDURA Trademark of BAY MATERIALS, LLC—Serial Number 87878407—Alter. https://alter.com/trademarks/zendura-87878407 Accessed February 13, 2022.
- Mudri NH, Abdullah LC, Aung MM, Salleh MZ, Biak DRA, Rayung M. Comparative study of aromatic and cycloaliphatic isocyanate effects on physico-chemical properties of bio-based polyurethane acrylate coatings. Polymers 2020;12:1494.
- Khadivi P, Salami-Kalajahi M, Roghani-Mamaqani H, Sofla RLM. Polydimethylsiloxane-based polyurethane/cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites: from structural properties toward cytotoxicity. Silicon 2022;14:1695–703.
- Gregorí Valdés BS, Gomes CSB, Gomes PT, Ascenso JR, Diogo HP, Hermínio P, et al. New biocompatible polyurethanes: synthesis, structural characterization and cytotoxicity. 2018. doi: 10.20944/preprints201809.0445.v1.
- Lombardo L, Martines E, Mazzanti V, Arreghini A, Mollica F, Siciliani G. Stress relaxation properties of four orthodontic aligner materials: a 24-hour in vitro study. Angle Orthod 2017;87:11–8.
- Chemical and mechanical characteristics of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials - PubMed. https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26999889/. Accessed December 26, 2021.
- Product datasheet DURAN®. http://products.scheu-dental.com/ documents/5000/1-DOC/0/0/0/0/3/Datasheet-DUR A N_ Original_3055.pdf. Accessed June 18,2022.
- https://taglus.com/wp-content/themes/taglus/images/downloads/ Brochure.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2022.
- Lu QW, Macosko CW. Comparing the compatibility of various functionalized polypropylenes with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Polymer (Guildf) 2004;45:1981–91.
- Liu CL, Sun WT, Liao W, Lu WX, Li QW, Jeong Y, et al. Colour stabilities of three types of orthodontic clear aligners exposed to staining agents. Int J Oral Sci 2016;8:246.
- Tamburrino F, D’Antò V, Bucci R, Alessandri-Bonetti G, Barone S, Razionale AV. Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polymers for aligner manufacturing: In vitro study. Dent J 2020;8: 2020;8:47.
- And A, Zealand N. A perfect combination of elasticity, clarity and rigiditywww.taglus.com.auAccessed February 12, 2022.
- Boubakri A, Elleuch K, Guermazi N, Ayedi HF. Investigations on hygrothermal aging of thermoplastic polyurethane material. Mater Des 2009;10:3958–65.
- Wataha JC. Predicting clinical biological responses to dental materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:23–40.
- Devices@FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ devicesatfda/index.cfm?start_search=1&q=Y2xlY XIgY WxpZ 25lcg==&approval_date_from=05%2F25%2F1996&approval_ date_to=05%2F21%2F2022&sort=approvaldatedesc& pagenum=10. Accessed May 24, 2022.
- Recognized Consensus Standardshttps://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfStandards/results.cfm?start_search=1& productcode=&category=&type=&title=&organization=& referencenumber=10993®ulationnumber=&effectivedatefrom= &effectivedateto=&PAGENUM=500. Accessed June 9, 2022.
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services https://www. accessdata.fda.gov/CDRH510K/K081960.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2022.
- Gerard Bradley T, Teske L, Eliades G, Zinelis S, Eliades T. Do the mechanical and chemical properties of InvisalignTM appliances change after use? A retrieval analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016;38: 27–31.
- Bakdach WMM, Haiba M, Hadad R. Changes in surface morphology, chemical and mechanical properties of clear aligners during intraoral usage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthod 2022;20:100610.