Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Validity and reproducibility of a tripoding method in point registration-based 3D superimposition software compared to a conventional cephalometric method Cover

Validity and reproducibility of a tripoding method in point registration-based 3D superimposition software compared to a conventional cephalometric method

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104–113.
  2. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:189–196.
  3. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1–16.
  4. De Luca Canto G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C, Major PW. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18:65–76.
  5. Wan Hassan WN, Othman SA, Chan CS, Ahmad R, Ali SN, Abd Rohim A. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;15:886–895.
  6. Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Iijima S, Yozgatian JH, Cha BK, Yoshida N. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2009;79:447–453.
  7. Chen G, Chen S, Zhang X Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:70–79.
  8. Park T-J, Lee S-H, Lee K-S. A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:169–181.
  9. Bailey LTJ, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod 1996;66:73–78.
  10. Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N. Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures. Sci Rep 2017;7:5838.
  11. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 1995;65:43–48.
  12. Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:325–331.
  13. Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram NC, Sandler J, O'Brien K. Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:480–485.
  14. Chen G, Al Awadi M, Chambers D, Lagravère-Vich M, Xu T, Oh H. The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years. BMC Oral Health 2020;20.
  15. Garib D, Miranda F, Yatabe MS. Superimposition of maxillary digital models using the palatal rugae: Does ageing affect the reliability? Orthod Craniofac Res 2019;22:183–193.
  16. Chrcanovic BR, Custódio AL. Anatomical variation in the position of the greater palatine foramen. J Oral Sci 2010;52:109–113.
  17. Zablocki HL, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:852–860.
  18. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–163.
  19. Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O’Brien K. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: a 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:10–20.
  20. Abdi AH, Nouri M. Registration of serial maxillary models via the weighted rugae superimposition method. Orthod Craniofac Res 2017;20:79–84.
  21. Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Franchi L, Ruellas A, Jackson T. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:747–754, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.026.
  22. Choi D-S, Jeong Y-M, Jang I, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Cha B-K. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 2010;80:685–691.
  23. Choi J-I, Cha B-K, Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Choi D-S, Jang I-S. Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:235–241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2022-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 281 - 289
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2022
|
Published on: Sep 6, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Nor Nadia Zakaria, Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan, Yasmin Kamarudin, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 38 (2022): Issue 2 (July 2022)