Have a personal or library account? Click to login
In vitro evaluation of surface characteristics comparing WaterLase (Biolase®) with tungsten carbide burs for composite removal: a pilot study Cover

In vitro evaluation of surface characteristics comparing WaterLase (Biolase®) with tungsten carbide burs for composite removal: a pilot study

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. Fitzpatrick DA, Way DC. The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel. Am J Orthod 1977;72:671–81.
  2. Ireland AJ, Hosein I, Sherriff M. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:413–9.
  3. Banerjee A, Paolinelis G, Socker M, McDonald F, Watson TF. An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass airabrasion in the ‘selective’ removal of orthodontic resin adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:488–92.
  4. Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: a review of the literature. Br Dent J 2001;190:309–16.
  5. Oliver RG, Griffiths J. Different techniques of residual composite removal following debonding-time taken and surface enamel appearance. Br J Orthod 1992;19:131–7.
  6. Caspersen I. Residual acrylic adhesive after removal of plastic orthodontic brackets: a scanning electron microscopic study. Am J Orthod 1977;71:637–50.
  7. Sandison RM. Tooth surface appearance after debonding. Br J Orthod. Oct 1981;8:199–201.
  8. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:196–200.
  9. Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L. Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: clinical application. Am J Orthod 1977;71:651–65.
  10. Burapavong V, Marshall GW, Apfel DA, Perry HT. Enamel surface characteristics on removal of bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1978;74:176–87.
  11. Retief DH, Denys FR. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthod 1979;49:1–10.
  12. Zachrisson BU, Arthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;75:121–7.
  13. Gait C. Use of an automatic hand-piece for debonding of composite resin. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:254–6.
  14. Buyukyilmaz T, Zachrisson BU. Improved orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam. Part 2. Lathe-cut, admixed, and spherical amalgams with different intermediate resins. Angle Orthod 1998;68:337–44.
  15. Cardoso LA, Valdrighi HC, Vedovello Filho M, Correr AB. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:105–12.
  16. Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizario L, Pereira JR. Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e248–e251.
  17. Dumore T, Fried D. Selective ablation of orthodontic composite by using sub-microsecond IR laser pulses with optical feedback. Lasers Surg Med 2000;27:103–10.
  18. Alexander R, Xie J, Fried D. Selective removal of residual composite from dental enamel surfaces using the third harmonic of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 2002;30:240–5.
  19. Keller U, Raab WH, Hibst R. [Pulp reactions during Erbium YAG laser irradiation of hard tooth structure]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:158–60.
  20. Kang Y, Rabie AB, Wong RW. A review of laser applications in orthodontics. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. Spring 2014;25:47–56.
  21. Ajwa N, Alfayez H, Al-Oqab H, Melibary R, Alzamil Y. The effect of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser in debonding of orthodontic brackets: a systematic review of the literature. Photobiomodul. Photomed Laser Surg 2021;39:725–33.
  22. Mesaros A, Mesaros M, Buduru S. Orthodontic bracket removal using LASER-technology—a short systematic literature review of the past 30 years. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:548. doi: 10.3390/ma15020548.
  23. Fornaini C, Merigo E, Vescovi P, Lagori G, Rocca J. Use of laser in orthodontics: applications and perspectives. Laser Ther 2013;22:115–24.
  24. Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Erdem AS, Tozlu M, Arun T. Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:195–200.
  25. Nalbantgil D, Tozlu M, Oztoprak MO. Pulpal thermal changes following Er-YAG laser debonding of ceramic brackets. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:912429.
  26. Grzech-Lesniak K, Matys J, Zmuda-Stawowiak D, et al. Er:YAG laser for metal and ceramic bracket debonding: an in vitro study on intrapulpal temperature, SEM, and EDS analysis. Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:595–600.
  27. Almeida HC, Vedovello Filho M, Vedovello SA, Young AA, Ramirez-Yanez GO. ER: YAG laser for composite removal after bracket debonding: a qualitative SEM analysis. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. Spring 2009;20:9–13.
  28. Sedky Y, AbdelHamid MB. Evaluating the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser for recycling of debonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Lasers in Dental Science. 2021;5:185–91.
  29. Fjeld M, Ogaard B. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:575–81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2022-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 194 - 201
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2021
|
Accepted on: May 1, 2022
|
Published on: Jul 14, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Mohammed Alkandari, Stefan Abela, Alessandra Booth, Dirk Bister, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 38 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)