References
- Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket’s self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97: 219–28.
- Fansa M, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C.The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments. J Orofac Orthop 2009; 70:285–96.
- Pandis N, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2009;31: 590–5.
- Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop 2008;133:738–42.
- Badawi HM, Toogood RW, Carey JP, Heo G, Major PW. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:721–8.
- Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C. Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2008;78: 1030–4.
- Pandis N, Strigou S, Eliades T. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006;9:193–8.
- Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M. An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng 1992;14:371–8.
- Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M. Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:169–78.
- Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Forces and moments generated with various incisor intrusion systems on maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Angle Orthod 2009;79:928–33.
- Moore RJ, Watts JT, Hood JA, Burritt DJ. Intra-oral temperature variation over 24 hours. Eur J Orthod 1999;21: 249–61.
- Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977;72:1–22.
- Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof RJ. Bioprogressive therapy. Denver: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, 1979:p.189. Page no is correct
- Burstone CJ. Variable-modulus orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981;80:1–16.
- Kapila S, Sachdeva R. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:100–9.
- van Steenbergen E, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Aartman IH. The influence of force magnitude on intrusion of the maxillary segment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:723–9.
- Halazonetis DJ. Ideal arch force systems: a center-of-resistance perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114:256–64.
- Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Force systems from an ideal arch. Am J Orthod 1974;65:270–89.
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M, Defraia E, Barbato E. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth. Angle Orthod 2009;79:533–9.
- Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:442–7.
- Budd S, Daskalogiannakis J, Tompson BD. A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available selfligating bracket systems. Eur J Orthod 2008;30: 645–53.
- Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second- order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:472–82.
- Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod 1997;3: 166–77.