References
- Angle EH. The treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White;1907: 64.
- Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The clinical management of basic maxillofacial orthopedic appliances. In: Mechanics. Vol.1, Littleton, Mass.: PSG Publishing;1987:10–3.
- Stoner CC. An interview: AAFO’s man of the year 1984, Dr John W. Witzig. Funct Orthod 1984; 1(4): 9–15.
- Broadbent JM. Facing malocclusion: achieving harmony and balance. Dent Today 1990; 9(6): 41–5.
- Bowbeer GR. Saving the face and the TMJ: part 2. Funct Orthod 1986; 3(2): 9–13, 15, 17.
- Bowbeer GR. The sixth key to facial beauty and TMJ health. Funct Orthod 1987; 4(4): 4–20.
- Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462–6.
- Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jacobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes to Class II division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 28–37.
- Gianelly AA. Extraction versus nonextraction. In: Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y, eds. Extraction versus nonextraction. Paris: SID Publisher; 1995: 173–84.
- Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 220–30.
- Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 31–42.
- Young, T, Smith, R. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 452–8.
- Rushing, SE, Silberman, SL, Meydrech, EF, Tuncay, OC. How dentists perceive the effects of orthodontic extraction on facial appearance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 769–72.
- Kerns, LL, Silveira, AM, Kerns, DG, Regennitter, FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Aesthetic Dent 1997; 9: 76–85.
- Lines, P, Lines, R, Lines, C. Profilemetrics and facial aesthetics. Am J Orthod 1978; 73: 648–57.
- Prahl-Anderson, B, Boersma, H, Van der Linden, FPGM, Moore, AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98: 209–12.
- Kerr, WJS, O’Donnell, JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990; 17: 299–304.
- Peck, S and Peck, L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial aesthetics. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 105–26.
- Johnson, DK and Smith, RJ. Smile aesthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 162–7.
- Bishara, SE and Jakobsen, JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: Assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 639–44.
- Cochrane, SM, Cunningham, SJ, Hunt, NP. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31: 164–68.
- Oynick, CA. The impact of orthodontic treatment on perceived facial aesthetics. [Master’s thesis] St. Louis: St. Louis University, 1988.
- Bowman, SJ, Johnston, LE, Jr. The aesthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3–10.
- Paquette, DE, Beattie, JR, Johnston, LE, Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 102: 1–14.
- Luppanapornlarp, S, Johnston, LE, Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: A long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 257–72.
- Johnston, LE, Jr., Paquette, DE, Beattie, JR, Cassidy, DW, McCray, JF, Killiany, DM. The reduction of susceptibility bias in retrospective comparisions of alternative treatment strategies. In: Vig, KD and Vig, PS, eds. Clinical research as the basis of clinical practice. Craniofacial Growth Series 25. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1991: 155–77.
- Beattie, JR, Paquette, DE, Johnston, LE, Jr. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with “borderline,” equally susceptible class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105: 444–9.
- James, RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and non-extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 265–76.
- Scott, SH, and Johnston, LE, Jr. The aesthetic impact of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment on matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 116: 352–8.
- Hagler, BL. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction treatments in equally susceptible African-American patients. [Master’s thesis] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1995.
- Caplan, MJ, Shivapuja, PK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 129–36.
- Boley, JC. Extraction versus nonextraction: has the pendulum swung too far? [Summary of presentation to the Southern Region P.C.S.O. meeting June, 1991, Los Angeles, California] Pac Co Soc Orthod Bull, 1991; 63: 58–9.
- Boley, JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the Southern Component of the Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (June 14) and the National meeting of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists (August 14), 1991.
- Boley, JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the 92nd Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, St. Louis, Missiouri, (May 11), 1992.
- Rossouw, PE. A longitudinal study of the stability of the dentition following orthodontic treatment. [PhD Dissertation] University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa, 1992.
- Sandusky, WC. A long term postretention study of Tweed extraction treatment. [Master’s thesis] University of Tennessee, Memphis, 1983.
- Franklin, GS, Rossouw, PE, Woodside, DG. A longitudinal study of dental and skeletal parameters associated with stability of orthodontic treatment. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 452–3.
- Little, RM, Wallen, TR, Reidel, RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by conventional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349–65.
- Dierkes, JM. The beauty of the face: An orthodontic perspective. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 89(special issue): 89-95E.
- Hulsey, CM. An aesthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132–44.
- Rigsbee, OH III, Sperry, TP, BeGole, EA. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthogn Surg 1988; 3: 233–9.
- Gianelly, AA, Arena, SA, Bernstein, L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the lightwire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 269–76.
- Adenwalla, ST, Kronman, JA. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise appliance: A comparative study of mandibular growth and facial aesthetics. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 281–98.
- Righellis, EG. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator, and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthod 1983; 53: 107–21.
- Johnston, LE, Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatment methods. In: McNamara, JA Jr, Carlson, DS, Vig, PS, Ribbens, KA, eds. Science and clinical judgement in orthodontics. Craniofacial Growth Series 19. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1986: 103–48.
- Livieratos, FA and Johnston, LE, Jr. A comparision of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 118–31.
- Ghafari, JG. Comparisons of extraoral traction and functional appliance therapy. Presentation to the 97th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, Philadelphia, 1997.
- Little, RM, Riedel, RA, Stein, A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 393–404.
- Schwarze, CW. Expansion and relapse in long term follow-up studies. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 1972 :275–284.
- Dale, JG. Interceptive guidance of occlusion with emphasis on diagnosis. In: Graber, TM, Vanarsdall, RL, eds. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994: 291–377.
- Lutz, HD, Poulton, DR. Stability of dental arch expansion in the deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 299-315.
- Bruno, EC. Evaluation of post-retention mandibular arch dimensions following expansion in the deciduous or early mixed dentition. [Master’s thesis] San Francisco: University of the Pacific, 1990.
- Peak, JD. Cuspid stability. Am J Orthod 1956; 42: 608–41.
- Bishara, SE, Chadha, JM, Potter, RB. Stability of intercanine width, overbite, and overjet correction. Am J Orthod 1973; 63: 588–95.
- Shapiro, PA. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 58–70.
- Kuftinec, MM. Effect of edgewise treatment and retention on mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 316–22.
- El-Mangoury, NH. Orthodontic relapse in subjects with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasia. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 548–61.
- Sondhi, A, Cleall, JF, Begole, EA. Dimensional changes in the arches of orthodontically treated cases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 60–74.
- Uhde, MD, Sadowsky, C, Begole, EA. Long term stability of dental relationships after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1983;53:240–52.
- Glenn, G, Sinclair, PM, Alexander, RG. Non-extraction orthodontic therapy: Post-treatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92: 321–8.
- Geran, RE. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition [Master’s thesis] Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1998.
- Burke, SP, Silveira, AM, Goldsmith, LJ, Yancey, JM, Stewart, AV, Scarfe, WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1997; 68: 53–60.
- Proffit, WR, Ackerman, JL. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan. In: Proffit, WR, Fields, HW, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics, St. Louis: Mosby, 1993; 186–224.
- Årtun, J, Krogstad, O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 255–332.
- Dorfman, HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 286–97.
- Wennström, JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1996; 2: 46–52.
- Steiner, CG, Pearson, JK, Ainamo, J. Changes of the marginal periodontum as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981; 52: 314–20.
- Andlin-Sobocki, A, Bodin, L. Dimensional alterations of the gingiva related to changes of facial/lingual tooth position in permanent anterior teeth of children. A 2-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 219–24.
- Little, RM. Orthodontic stability and relapse. [Summary of presentation to annual session, November 13, 1990, Phoenix, Arizona] Pac Coast Soc Orthod Bull 1991; 63: 35–8.
- Dugoni, SA, Lee, JS, Varela, J, Dugoni, AA. Early mixed dentition treatment: Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1995; 65: 311–20.
- Arnold, S. Analysis of leeway space in the mixed dentition. [Master’s thesis] Boston: Boston University, 1991.
- Gianelly, AA. Crowding: timing of treatment. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 415–7.
- Gianelly, AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 118–94.
- Gianelly, AA. One-phase versus two-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 556–9.
- White, LW. JCO Interviews: Dr. Anthony Gianelly on current issues in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1996; 30: 439–46.
- Bowman, S.J. One-stage versus two-stage treatment: Are two really necessary? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 111–6.
- Proffit, WR. Forty-year review review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 407–14.
- Johnston, LE, Jr. Let them eat cake: The struggle between form and substance in orthodontic clinical investigation. Clin Orthod Res. 1998; 1: 88–93.
- Sadowsky, C. The risk of orthodontic treatment for producing temporomandibular disorders: A literature overview. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 79–83.
- Greene, CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 222–8.
- McNamara, JA, Jr., Seligman, DA, Okeson, JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9: 73–90.
- Luecke, PE, Johnston, LE Jr. The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: Testing the central dogma of “functional orthodontics.” Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 4–12.
- Nelson, G. Editorial: Evidence-based orthodontics, Pac Coast Soc Orthod 1997; 69: 11–12.
- Peck, S. Editorial: “Philosophy” and evidence-based orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 403.
- Raphael, K., Marbach, J.J. Evidence-based care of musculoskeletal facial pain: Implications for the clinical science of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 73–9.
- Johnston, L.E., Jr. A long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction Class II therapy. Presentation at: 96th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists; May 11, 1992; St. Louis, Missouri.
- Johnston, L.E., Jr. The value of information and the cost of uncertainty: Who pays the bill? OERF Newsletter 1998: 37; 7–15.