Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Age changes in orthodontic treatment need: a longitudinal study of 10- and 13-year-old children, using the Dental Aesthetic Index Cover

Age changes in orthodontic treatment need: a longitudinal study of 10- and 13-year-old children, using the Dental Aesthetic Index

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Tang ELK, Wei HY. Recording and measuring malocclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103: 344–51.
  2. Jago JD. The epidemiology of dental occlusion; a critical appraisal. J Pub Health Dent 1974; 34: 80–93.
  3. Cons N, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. 1986.
  4. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 315–29.
  5. Oteyumi OD, Noar JH. A comparison between the DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 35–40.
  6. Keay P, Freer T, Basford K. Orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Aust Orthod J 1993; 13: 4–7.
  7. Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 410–16.
  8. Johnson M, Harkness M. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old New Zealand school children. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 1–8.
  9. Crowther P, Harkness M, Herbison P. Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin school children. N Z Dent J 1997; 93: 72–8.
  10. Oteyumi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7.
  11. Tarvit DJ, Freer TJ. Assessing malocclusion: the time factor. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 31–4.
  12. Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Com Dent Health 1994; 11: 147–51.
  13. Johnson M, Harkness M, Crowther P, Herbison P. A comparison of two methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need in the mixed dentition: DAI and IOTN. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 82–7.
  14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307–10.
  15. Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128–32.
  16. Chi J Y, Harkness EM, Crowther P. A longitudinal study of orthodontic treatment need in Dunedin schoolchildren. N Z Dent J 2000; 96:4–9.
  17. Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1995; 41: 43–6.
  18. Freer TJ. Assessment of occlusal status: the matched-pair similarity technic. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 412–22.
  19. Björk A. Variability and age changes in overjet and over-bite. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 779–801.
  20. Oteyumi D, Ogunyinka A, Dosumu O. et al. Perceptions of dental aesthetics in the United States and Nigeria. Com Dent Oral Epid 1998; 26: 418–20.
  21. Shaw WC, Lewis HG, Robertson NRE. Perception of malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975; 138: 211–16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2000-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 150 - 156
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2000
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2000
Published on: Dec 13, 2023
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Jonathan Chi, Mark Johnson, Michael Harkness, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.