Abstract
The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) was used to assess the prevalence of unmet orthodontic treatment need in 150 13-year-old schoolchildren in Dunedin, New Zealand, and to compare the findings with those obtained in the same children at 10 years of age.
Fewer 13-year-olds (27%) had a “mandatory” need of orthodontic treatment than when they were 10 years old (33%), 20% had “no/little” need for orthodontic treatment, 33% had an “elective” need for treatment and 20% had a “desirable” need for treatment. The fall in DAI scores is attributed to over-sensitivity of the Index to mixed dentition traits.
When the individual scores were analysed, only 7% of the 10-year-olds were given the same scores as when they were 13 years old, 52% were given higher scores and 41% were given lower scores. This disagreement between scores was masked to a limited extent by the DAI categories: 49% of the 10-year-olds were assigned to the same DAI category at 13 years of age, 20% to a greater treatment-need category and approximately 30% to a lower treatment-need category.
The DAI, in common with other malocclusion indices, is unreliable over time because it is affected by developmental changes in the occlusal traits measured. Aust Orthod J 2000; 16: 150–6