Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mitochondrial Genome Aberrations In Canine Spleen Tumours Cover

Mitochondrial Genome Aberrations In Canine Spleen Tumours

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

List of dogs diagnosed with spleen tumours (STs), histopathological assessment, and characteristics of individuals

NumberBreed/CrossbreedSexAge of dogSize*Tumour profileTumour typeMalignant/Benign
ST002CrossbreedF10MonehaemangiosarcomaM
ST008Fox Terrier SmoothM10Soneliposarcoma
ST010English Cocker SpanielF15Mtwohaemangiosarcoma
ST017CrossbreedM12Lonehistiocytic sarcoma
ST030BoxerM12Lonehaemangiosarcoma
ST056German ShepherdM10Lone, disintegrative
ST073CrossbreedF10MtwohaemangiomaB
ST074DachshundM12S/MonehaemangiosarcomaM
ST076CrossbreedF12SonehaemangiomaB
ST088CrossbreedM13Mone, disintegrativelymphomaM
ST089English PointerF12M/Lonehaemangiosarcoma
ST094CrossbreedM15Mone
ST126German ShepherdF9Lmany, disintegrative
ST145Miniature SchnauzerF11Sone
ST148CrossbreedM12Mone, disintegrative
ST164Jack Russell TerrierM5Sone
ST174Miniature SchnauzerF10Sone
ST177CrossbreedM8Lone
ST197German ShepherdM11Lone, disintegrative

* the size of the dogs was based on the classification according to the guidelines of American Kennel Club: S – small <9 kg, M – medium 9.5–22 kg, L – large 23–45 kg.

Figure 1.

Histopathological evaluations of spleen tumours in dogs: 1A. Histiocytic sarcoma – visible infiltration of polymorphic round to spindyloid multinucleate cells and foci of necrosis, 1B. Haemangioma – visible irregularly dilated vascular channels in stromal collagen, 1C. Haemangiosarcoma – visible bundles of spindle-shaped cells and slit-like vascular spaces. All tissues were H&E stained × 100

Figure 2.

Number of SNPs found in mtDNA genes

Table 2.

List of common polymorphisms present in all the dogs diagnosed with spleen tumours (STs)

Gene/RegionReference sequenceSequence variantCodon change/position in tRNAAmino acid change/tRNA regionSIFT1 for nonsynonymous changes
tRNA Leu (UUR)m.2678m.2678_2679insG8_9between acceptor stem and DHU stem–
COX1m.5367Cm.5367C>TCTG→TTGp.Leu7=
m.5444Tm.5444T>CGCT→GCCp.Ala32=
m.6065Am.6065A>GGGA→GGGp.Gly239=
ATP6m.8368Cm.8368C>TCTC→CTTp.Leu135=
COX3m.8807Gm.8807G>ATGC→TACp.Cys55Tyrtolerant
ND4Lm.9911_9912m.9911_9912insGTATG→GTGp.Met1Valintolerant
ND5m.13299Tm.13299T>ATCA→ACAp.Ser508Thrtolerant
D-loopm.15814Cm.15814C>T–––

1 SIFT – sorting intolerant from tolerant.

Figure 3.

Association between the HSA sample group (I, II, III) and the increasing number of SNPs in the ND4, ND5, COX3, and ATP6 genes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 999 - 1007
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2025
Published on: Sep 26, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Angelika Tkaczyk-Wlizło, Krzysztof Kowal, Anna Śmiech, Brygida Ślaska, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.