Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mitochondrial genome aberrations in canine spleen tumours* Cover

Mitochondrial genome aberrations in canine spleen tumours*

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

List of dogs diagnosed with spleen tumours (STs), histopathological assessment, and characteristics of individuals

NumberBreed/CrossbreedSexAge of dogSize*Tumour profileTumour typeMalignant/Benign
ST002CrossbreedF10MonehaemangiosarcomaM
ST008Fox Terrier SmoothM10Soneliposarcoma
ST010English Cocker SpanielF15Mtwohaemangiosarcoma
ST017CrossbreedM12Lonehistiocytic sarcoma
ST030BoxerM12Lonehaemangiosarcoma
ST056German ShepherdM10Lone, disintegrative
ST073CrossbreedF10MtwohaemangiomaB
ST074DachshundM12S/MonehaemangiosarcomaM
ST076CrossbreedF12SonehaemangiomaB
ST088CrossbreedM13Mone, disintegrativelymphomaM
ST089English PointerF12M/Lonehaemangiosarcoma
ST094CrossbreedM15Mone
ST126German ShepherdF9Lmany, disintegrative
ST145Miniature SchnauzerF11Sone
ST148CrossbreedM12Mone, disintegrative
ST164Jack Russell TerrierM5Sone
ST174Miniature SchnauzerF10Sone
ST177CrossbreedM8Lone
ST197German ShepherdM11Lone, disintegrative

* the size of the dogs was based on the classification according to the guidelines of American Kennel Club: S – small <9 kg, M – medium 9.5–22 kg, L – large 23–45 kg.

Figure 1.

Histopathological evaluations of spleen tumours in dogs: 1A. Histiocytic sarcoma – visible infiltration of polymorphic round to spindyloid multinucleate cells and foci of necrosis, 1B. Haemangioma – visible irregularly dilated vascular channels in stromal collagen, 1C. Haemangiosarcoma – visible bundles of spindle-shaped cells and slit-like vascular spaces. All tissues were H&E stained × 100

Figure 2.

Number of SNPs found in mtDNA genes

Table 2.

List of common polymorphisms present in all the dogs diagnosed with spleen tumours (STs)

List of common polymorphisms occurring in each dog with ST
Gene/RegionReference sequenceSequence variantCodon change/position in tRNAAmino acid change/tRNA regionSIFT1 for nonsynonymous changes
tRNALeu (UUR)m.2678m.2678_2679insG8_9between acceptor stem and DHU stem-
COX1m.5367Cm.5367C>TCTG→TTGp.Leu7=
m.5444Tm.5444T>CGCT→GCCp.Ala32=
m.6065Am.6065A>GGGA→GGGp.Gly239=
ATP6m.8368Cm.8368C>TCTC→CTTp.Leu135=
COX3m.8807Gm.8807G>ATGC→TACp.Cys55Tyrtolerant
ND4Lm.9911_9912m.9911_9912insGTATG→GTGp.Met1Valintolerant
ND5m.13299Tm.13299T>ATCA→ACAp.Ser508Thrtolerant
D-loopm.15814Cm.15814C>T---

1 SIFT – sorting intolerant from tolerant.

Figure 3.

Association between the HSA sample group (I, II, III) and the increasing number of SNPs in the ND4, ND5, COX3, and ATP6 genes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 (formerly 1642-3402) | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2025
Published on: Jun 5, 2026
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Angelika Tkaczyk-Wlizło, Krzysztof Kowal, Anna Śmiech, Brygida Ślaska, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.