Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Importance of In Situ and Ex Situ Protection of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) in Poland with Emphasis on Drone Semen Cryopreservation – A Review Cover

The Importance of In Situ and Ex Situ Protection of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) in Poland with Emphasis on Drone Semen Cryopreservation – A Review

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Abdelkader F.B., Kairo G., Tchamitchian S., Bonnet M., Cousin M., Barbouche N., Belzunces L., Brunet J. (2018). Effects of clothianidin exposure on semen parameters of honey bee drones. J. New Sci., 59: 3791–3798.
  2. Alcay S., Cakmak S., Cakmak I., Mulkpinar E., Gokce E., Ustuner B., Sen H., Nur Z. (2019 a). Successful cryopreservation of honey bee drone spermatozoa with royal jelly supplemented extenders. Cryobiology, 87: 28–31.
  3. Alcay S., Cakmak S., Cakmak I., Mülkpınar E., Toke M.B., Ustuner B., Sen H., Nur Z. (2019 b). Drone semen cryopreservation with protein supplemented TL-Hepes based extender. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 25: 553–557.
  4. Alcay S., Cakmak S., Cakmak I., Aktar A., Yilmaz M., Ustuner B., Akkasoglu M., Taskiran S., Ayaz E., Sagirkaya H., Nur Z. (2021). L-Carnitine supplemented extenders improve post-thawing quality of honey bee drone (Apis mellifera) spermatozoa. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 27: 489–493.
  5. Alcay S., Cakmak S., Cakmak I,., Aktar A., Yılmaz M., Üstüner B., Duman M.U., Özkan H., Akkaya Y., Sağırkaya H., Nur Z.E. (2022). Honey bee drone (Apis mellifera) sperm cryopreservation with rainbow trout seminal plasma supplemented extenders. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc., 4: 527–534.
  6. Amidi F., Pazhohan A., Shabani Nashtaei M., Khodarahmian M., Nekoonam S. (2016). The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: a review. Cell Tissue Bank, 17: 745–756.
  7. Bieńkowska M., Splitt A., Węgrzynowicz P., Maciorowski R. (2021). The buzz changes within time: Native Apis mellifera mellifera honeybee subspecies less and less popular among Polish beekeepers since 1980. Agriculture, 11: 652.
  8. Bugin G., Lenzi L., Ranzani G., Barisan L., Porrini C., Zanella A., Bolzonella, C. (2022). Agriculture and pollinating insects, no longer a choice but a need: EU agriculture’s dependence on pollinators in the 2007–2019 period. Sustainability, 14: 3644.
  9. Ciereszko A., Wilde J., Dietrich G.J., Siuda M., Bąk B., Judycka S., Karol H. (2017). Sperm parameters of honey bee drones exposed to imidacloprid. Apidologie, 48: 211–222.
  10. Cobey S.W. (2007). Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance. Apidologie, 38: 390–410.
  11. Cobey S.W. (2016). An introduction to instrumental insemination of honey bee queens. Bee World, 93: 33–36.
  12. Cobey S.W., Tarpy D.R., Woyke J. (2013). Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. J. Apic. Res., 52: 1–18.
  13. Collins A.M. (2000). Survival of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) spermatozoa stored at above-freezing temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol., 93: 568–571.
  14. Collins A.M. (2004 a). Effective viability threshold for preserved honey bee semen. Proc. 30th Annual Conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS). Portland, Oregon, USA, 10–13.01.2004, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 16: 166.
  15. Collins A.M. (2004 b). Sources of variation in the viability of honey bee, Apis mellifera L., semen collected for artificial insemination. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 45: 231–237.
  16. Dadkhah F., Nehzati-Paghaleh G., Zhandi M., Emamverdi M., Hopkins B.K. (2016). Preservation of honey bee spermatozoa using egg yolk and soybean lecithin-based semen extenders and a modified cryopreservation protocol. J. Apic. Res., 55: 279–283.
  17. Dz.U. 184, 1532 (1992). Journal of Laws No. 184, Item 1532, of 5 June 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity (in Polish). Available online: (https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20021841532/O/D20021532.pdf
  18. Fine J.D., Foster L.J., McAfee A. (2023). Indirect exposure to insect growth disruptors affects honey bee (Apis mellifera) reproductive behaviors and ovarian protein expression. PLoS One, 18: e0292176.
  19. Fischer F. (1987). Investigations on the influence of the sperm mix technique on the grade of filling of the spermatheca. In: Reports of the meeting of the Association of Bee Research Institutes. Apidologie, 18: 335–393.
  20. Fisher A., Rangel J. (2018). Exposure to pesticides during development negatively affects honey bee (Apis mellifera) drone sperm viability. PLoS One, 13: e0208630.
  21. Gromisz M. (1997). The resources of native honey bee and its protection (in Polish). In: The advances in apidology in Poland, Cierzniak T. (ed.) (in Polish). Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland, pp. 47–56.
  22. Gül A., Şahinler N., Onal, A.G., Hopkins B.K., Sheppard W.S. (2017). Effects of diluents and plasma on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) drone frozen-thawed semen fertility. Theriogenology, 101: 109–113.
  23. Harbo J.R. (1977). Survival of honey bee spermatozoa in liquid nitrogen. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 70: 257–258.
  24. Harbo J.R. (1979). Storage of honey bee spermatozoa at –196°C. J. Apic. Res., 18: 57–63.
  25. Harbo J.R. (1990). Artificial mixing of spermatozoa from honey bees and evidence for sperm competition. J. Apic. Res., 29: 151–158.
  26. Harbo J.R., Hered J. (1986). Sterility in honey bees caused by dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Hered., 77: 129–130.
  27. Hopkins B.K., Herr C. (2010). Factors affecting the successful cryo-preservation of honey bee (Apis mellifera) spermatozoa. Apidologie, 41: 548–556.
  28. Hopkins B.K., Herr C., Sheppard W.S. (2012). Sequential generations of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens produced using cryopre-served semen. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 24: 1079–1083.
  29. Hung C.C., Yiin L.M. (2023). Availability of using honey bees as bio-indicators of pesticide exposure in the vicinity of agricultural environments in Taiwan. Toxics, 11: 703.
  30. IZ-PIB (2024 a). Consolidated text. Genetic resources conservation programme for bee (in Polish). Available online: http://www.bioroznorodnosc.izoo.krakow.pl/pszczoly
  31. IZ-PIB (2024 b). Consolidated text. Genetic resources conservation programme for bee (in Polish). Available online:https://bioroznorodnosc.izoo.krakow.pl/pszczoly/liczebnosc
  32. Kaftanoglu O., Peng Y.S. (1984). Preservation of honey bee spermatozoa in liquid nitrogen. J. Apic. Res., 23: 157–163.
  33. Kolasa M., Molasy B. (2022). The native lines of honey bee (Apis mellifera) as a reservoir of genetic diversity and the traits of adaptivity to local conditions (in Polish). In: Conservative breeds in the progress of rural areas (in Polish). Monograph book – National Research Institute of Animal Production in Poland, 280.
  34. Kucharczyk M., Krzywonos M., Błaszczyk J., Seruga P., Piekara A., Zimny S., Borowiak D. (2017). The problems of apiculture in Poland (in Polish). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu (Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics), 494: 123–131.
  35. Leclercq N., Marshall L., Weekers T., Basu P., Benda D., Bevk D., Bhattacharya R., Bogusch P., Bontšutšnaja A., Bortolotti L., Cabirol N. (2023). Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards. Sci. Total Environ., 901: 165933.
  36. Liu Z., Liu F., Li G., Chi X., Wang Y., Wang H., Ma L., Han K., Zhao G., Guo X., Xu B. (2020). Metabolite support of long-term storage of sperm in the spermatheca of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens. Front. Physiol., 11: 574856.
  37. Locke S., Peng Y.S. (1993). The effects of drone age, semen storage and contamination on semen quality in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Physiol. Entomol., 18: 144–148.
  38. Madras-Majewska B., Skonieczna Ł. (2016). Evaluation of the breed identity of bees from apiaries located in the forests of the regional directorate of national forests in Białystok (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 1: 68–75.
  39. Madras-Majewska B., Skonieczna Ł. (2018). Traditional and modern methods used in phylogenesis and protection of native middle-European bee in Poland. Med. Weter., 74: 615–625.
  40. Madras-Majewska B., Skonieczna Ł. (2021). Diversification of morphological features of the dark European honey bee of the ‘Augustow M’ line. Animals, 11: 1156.
  41. Metz B.N., Tarpy D.R. (2019). Reproductive senescence in drones of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Insects, 10: 11.
  42. Moritz R.F.A. (1984). The effect of different diluents on insemination success in the honey bee using mixed semen. J. Apic. Res., 23: 164–167.
  43. Nur Z., Çakmak S.S., Çakmak I., Onder N.T., Gokçe E., Ustuner B., Alcay S., Toker M.B., Soylu M.K. (2020). Effects of trehalose supplementation on postthaw sperm quality of honey bee drones. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 10: 191–196.
  44. Oldroyd P., Fewell J.H. (2007). Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22: 408–413.
  45. Oleksa A., Căuia E., Siceanu A., Puškadija Z., Kovačić M., Pinto M.A., Rodrigues P.J., Hatjina F., Charistos L., Bouga M., Prešern J., Kandemir İ., Rašić S., Kusza S., Tofilski A. (2023). Honey bee (Apis mellifera) wing images: a tool for identification and conservation. Gigascience, 12: giad019.
  46. Özkök A.O., Selçuk M. (2020). Sperm storage and artificial insemination in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Sci. Lett., 2: 12–25.
  47. Paillard M., Rousseau A., Giovenazzo P., Bailey J.L. (2017). Preservation of domesticated honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) drone semen. J. Econ. Entomol., 110: 1412–1418.
  48. Podlewski M., Glogowski J., Ciereszko A., Wilde J., Demianowicz W. (2000). The preliminary results of research on the suitability of cryopreserved drone semen (in Polish). Pszczeln. Zesz. Nauk., 44: 68–70.
  49. Podlewski M., Glogowski J., Demianowicz W., Bialkowska, J. (2003). Application of fluorescent microscopy to determine the quality of drone sperm (in German). Apidologie, 34: 500–502.
  50. Schluns H., Moritz R.F.A., Neumann P., Kryger P., Koeniger G. (2005). Multiple nuptial flights, sperm transfer and the evolution of extreme polyandry in honey bee queens. Anim. Behav., 70: 125–131.
  51. Sharafi M., Borghei-Rad S.M., Hezavehei M., Shahverdi A., Benson J.D. (2022). Cryopreservation of semen in domestic animals: A review of current challenges, applications, and prospective strategies. Animals (Basel), 12: 3271.
  52. Skowronek W., Szymula J. (1998). Development of the method used for short-term preservation of drone semen (in Polish). Pszczeln. Zesz. Nauk., 42: 145–150.
  53. Skowronek W., Kruk C., Loc K. (1995). The insemination of queen honey bees with diluted semen. Apidologie, 26: 487–493.
  54. Smilga-Spalvina A., Spalvins K., Veidenbergs I. (2023). Review of sustainable cryopreservation and above-freezing storage solutions of European honey bee (Apis mellifera) drone semen. Environ. Clim. Technol., 27: 177–194.
  55. Stucky M., Hopkins B.K., Herr C. (2008). Cryopreservation of honey bee spermatozoa. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 20: 127–128.
  56. Tarpy D.R., Page R.E. (2000). No behavioural control over mating frequency in queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): implications for the evolution of extreme polyandry. Am. Nat., 155: 820–827.
  57. Taylor M., Guzman-Novoa E., Morfin N., Burh M. (2009). Improving viability of cryopreserved honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) sperm with selected diluents, cryoprotectants, and semen dilution ratios. Theriogenology, 72: 149–159.
  58. Wegener J., Bienefeld K. (2012). Toxicity of cryoprotectants to honey bee semen and queens. Theriogenology, 77: 600–607.
  59. Wegener J., May T., Kamp G., Bienefeld K. (2014 a). A successful new approach to honey bee semen cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 69: 236–242.
  60. Wegener J., May T., Kamp G., Bienefeld K. (2014 b). New methods and media for the centrifugation of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) drone semen. J. Econ. 107: 47–53.
  61. Wilde J., Podlewski M., Siuda M., Glogowski J., Ciereszko A., Demianowicz W. (2001). Preliminary results of artificial insemination of honey bee queens with spermatozoa stored in liquid nitrogen (-196°C). Apidologie, 32: 513–514.
  62. Withrow J.M., Tarpy D.R. (2018). Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. PLoS One, 13: e0199124.
  63. Woyke J. (1960). Natural and artificial insemination of honey bee queens (in Polish). Pszczeln. Zesz. Nauk., 4: 183–275.
  64. Woyke J., Jasiński Z. (1976). The influence of age on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queens. Apidologie, 7: 301–306.
  65. Woyke J., Jasiński Z. (1978). Influence of age of drones on the results of instrumental insemination of honey bee queens. Apidologie, 9: 203–212.
  66. Woyke J., Jasiński Z. (1982). Influence of the number of attendant workers on the number of spermatozoa entering the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queens kept outdoors in mating nuclei. J. Apic. Res., 21: 129–133.
  67. Woyke J., Jasiński Z. (1990). Effect of the number of attendant worker bees on the initiation of egg laying by instrumentally inseminated queens kept in small nuclei. J. Apic. Res., 29: 101–106.
  68. Yániz J., Palacín, I., Santolaria P. (2019). Effect of chamber characteristics, incubation, and diluent on motility of honey bee (Apis mellifera) drone sperm. Apidologie, 50: 472–481.
  69. Zych M., Denisow B., Gajda A., Kiljanek T., Kramarz P., Szentgyörgyi H. (2018). Why the pollinators are suitable? In: The National Strategy for Protection of Pollinating Insects, Kędzierska-Zaporowska M. (ed.) (in Polish). Greenpeace Foundation, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 12–15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2025-0064 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 1439 - 1447
Submitted on: Jul 25, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 24, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2025 Magdalena Bryła, Monika Trzcińska, Marcin Samiec, Małgorzata Kralka-Tabak, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.