Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Do the differences in egg contamination, penetration, and resistance against microorganisms among the hen genotypes exist?

Open Access
|May 2022

References

  1. Ahmed A.M.H., Rodríguez-Navarro A.B., Vidal M.L., Gautron J., García-Ruiz J.M., Nys Y. (2005). Changes in eggshell mechanical properties, crystallographic texture and in matrix proteins induced by moult in hens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 46: 268–279.10.1080/00071660500065425
  2. Akter Y., Kasim A., Omar H., Sazili A.Q. (2014). Effect of storage time and temperature on the quality characteristics of chicken eggs. J. Food Agric. Environ., 12: 87–92.
  3. Anderle V., Lichovníková M., Przywarová A., Dračková E. (2014). Egg quality of gene reserve Czech Golden Spotted hens. Acta Fytotech. Zootech., 17: 84–86.10.15414/afz.2014.17.03.84-86
  4. Aygun A., Sert D. (2013 a). Effects of prestorage application of propolis and storage time on eggshell microbial activity, hatchability, and chick performance in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. Poultry Sci., 92: 3330–3337.10.3382/ps.2013-0329124235245
  5. Aygun A., Sert D. (2013 b). Effects of vacuum packing on eggshell microbial activity and egg quality in table eggs under different storage temperatures. J. Sci. Food Agric., 93: 1626–1632.10.1002/jsfa.593623124536
  6. Bain M.M., Dunn I.C., Wilson P.W., Joseph N., De Ketelaere B., De Baerdemaeker J., Waddington D. (2006). Probability of an egg cracking during packing can be predicted using a simple non-destructive acoustic test. Brit. Poultry Sci., 47: 462–469.10.1080/00071660600829233
  7. Batkowska J., Brodacki A. (2017). Selected quality traits of eggs and the productivity of newly created laying hen hybrids dedicated to an extensive rearing system. Arch. Anim., 60: 87–93.10.5194/aab-60-87-2017
  8. Brodacki A., Batkowska J., Drabik K., Chabroszewska P., Łuczkiewicz P. (2019). Selected quality traits of table eggs depending on storage time and temperature. Brit. Food J., 121: 2016–2026.10.1108/BFJ-10-2018-0688
  9. D’Alba L., Shawkey M.D. (2015). Mechanisms of antimicrobial defense in avian eggs. J. Ornithol., 156: 399–408.10.1007/s10336-015-1226-1
  10. De Reu K., Messens W., Heyndrickx M., Rodenburg T.B., Uyttendaele M., Herman L. (2008). Bacterial contamination of table eggs and the influence of housing systems. World. Poultry Sci. J., 64: 5–19.10.1017/S0043933907001687
  11. Dikmen B.Y., İpek A., Şahan Ü., Petek M., Sözcü A. (2016). Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Sci., 95: 1564–1572.10.3382/ps/pew082
  12. Elmi M. (2004). Food safety: current situation, unaddressed issues and the emerging priorities. East. Mediterr. Health J., 10: 794–800.10.26719/2004.10.6.794
  13. Englmaierová E., Tůmová E., Charvátová V., Skřivan M. (2014). Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59: 345–352.10.17221/7585-CJAS
  14. FAO (2003). Assuring food safety and quality: guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Rome (Italy).
  15. FAO (2007). The state of world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Food; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome (Italy).
  16. Farewell A., Neidhardt F.C. (1998). Effect of temperature on in vivo protein synthetic capacity in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., 180: 4704–4710.10.1128/JB.180.17.4704-4710.1998
  17. Fisher K., Phillips C. (2009). The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology, 155: 1749–1757.10.1099/mic.0.026385-0
  18. Hanusová E., Hrnčár C., Hanus A., Oravcova M. (2015). Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotech. Zootech., 18: 20–24.10.15414/afz.2015.18.01.12-24
  19. Hanusová E., Hrnčár C., Hanus A., Ondruška Ľ. (2017). Characterization of native Slovak chicken and goose: a review. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 50: 144–148.
  20. Hernandez J.M., Beardswort P.M., Weber G. (2005). Egg quality meeting consumer expectations. Int. Poultry Prod., 13: 20–23.
  21. Hincke M.T., Gautron J., Panheleux M., Garcia-Ruiz J., McKee M.D., Nys Y. (2000). Identification and localization of lysozyme as a component of eggshell membranes and eggshell matrix. Matrix Biol., 19: 443–453.10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00095-0
  22. Hy-Line (2021). Hy-Line Brown: The World’s Most Balanced Egg Layer. Management Guide. https://www.hyline.com/varieties/brown
  23. Iannotti L.L., Lutter C.K., Bunn D.A., Stewart C.P. (2014). Eggs: the uncracked potential for improving maternal and young child nutrition among the world’s poor. Nutr. Rev., 72: 355–368.10.1111/nure.12107
  24. Jones D.R., Anderson K.E., Davis G.S. (2001). The effects of genetic selection on production parameters of single comb White Leghorn hens. Poultry Sci., 80: 1139–1143.10.1093/ps/80.8.1139
  25. Jones D.R., Curtis P.A., Anderson K.E., Jones F.T. (2004). Microbial contamination in inoculated shell eggs: II. Effects of layer strain and egg storage. Poultry Sci., 83: 95–100.10.1093/ps/83.1.95
  26. Jones D.R., Cox N.A., Guard J., Fedorka-Cray P.J., Buhr R.J., Gast R.K., Abdo Z., Rigsby L.L., Plumblee J.R., Karcher D.M., Robison C.I., Blatchford R.A., Makagon M.M. (2015). Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems. Poultry Sci., 94: 544–551.10.3382/ps/peu010
  27. Khatun H., Rashid M.A., Faruque S., Islam M.N., Ali M.Y. (2016). Study on egg quality characteristics of three commercial layer strains under different storage conditions. Int. J. Anim. Res., 1: 63–70.
  28. Kraus A., Zita L., Krunt O. (2019). The effect of different housing system on quality parameters of eggs in relationship to the age in brown egg-laying hens. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 25: 1246–1253.
  29. Kraus A., Zita L., Krunt O., Pokorná K. (2020). How genotype influences the egg quality in the second half of laying cycle? J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 21: 215–221.10.5513/JCEA01/21.2.2683
  30. Kraus A., Zita L., Krunt O., Härtlová H., Chmelíková E. (2021). Determination of selected biochemical parameters in blood serum and egg quality of Czech and Slovak native hens depending on the housing system and hen age. Poultry Sci., 100: 1142–1153.10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.039
  31. Krawczyk J. (2009). Quality of eggs from Polish native Greenleg Partridge chicken-hens maintained in organic vs. backyard production systems. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 27: 227–235.
  32. Krawczyk J., Sokołowicz Z. (2015). Effect of chicken breed and storage conditions of eggs on their quality. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech., 14: 109–118.
  33. Krawczyk J., Sokołowicz Z., Szymczyk B. (2011). Effect of housing system on cholesterol, vitamin and fatty acid content of yolk and physical characteristics of eggs from Polish native hens. Arch. Geflugelkd., 75: 151–157.
  34. Krunt O., Zita L., Kraus A., Okrouhlá M., Chodová D., Stupka R. (2021). Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) eggs and free range housing: A convenient alternative to laying hens’ eggs in terms of food safety? Poultry Sci., 100: 101006.10.1016/j.psj.2021.01.029
  35. Kulshreshtha G., Rodriguez-Navarro A., Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Diep T., Hincke M.T. (2018). Cuticle and pore plug properties in the table egg. Poultry Sci., 97: 1382–1390.10.3382/ps/pex409
  36. Kusuda S., Iwasawa A., Doi O., Ohya Y., Yoshizaki N. (2011). Diversity of the cuticle layer of avian eggshells. J. Poultry Sci., 48: 119–124.10.2141/jpsa.010103
  37. Lee M.H., Cho E.J., Choi E.S., Sohn S.H. (2016). The effect of storage period and temperature on egg quality in commercial eggs. Korean J. Poultry Sci., 43: 31–38.10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.1.31
  38. Lewko L., Gornowicz E. (2009). Egg albumen quality as affected by bird origin. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 10: 455–463.
  39. Messens W., Grijspeerdt K., Herman L. (2005). Eggshell penetration by Salmonella: a review. World. Poultry Sci. J., 61: 71–86.10.1079/WPS200443
  40. Moyle T., Drake K., Gole V., Chousalkar K., Hazel S. (2016). Bacterial contamination of eggs and behaviour of poultry flocks in the free range environment. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 49: 88–94.10.1016/j.cimid.2016.10.005
  41. Park Y.S., Yoo I.J., Jeon K.H., KimChang E.J., Oh H.I. (2003). Effects of various eggshell treatments on the egg quality during storage. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 1224–1229.10.5713/ajas.2003.1224
  42. Pohle K., Cheng H.W. (2009). Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poultry Sci., 88: 2042–2051.10.3382/ps.2009-00171
  43. Roberts J.R. (2004). Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poultry Sci., 41: 161–177.10.2141/jpsa.41.161
  44. Rodríguez-Navarro A.B., Domínguez-Gasca N., Muñoz A., Ortega-Huertas M. (2013). Change in the chicken eggshell cuticle with hen age and freshness. Poultry Sci., 92: 3026–3035.10.3382/ps.2013-03230
  45. Samli H.E., Agma A., Senkoylu N. (2005). Effects of storage time and temperature on egg quality in old laying hens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 14: 548–553.10.1093/japr/14.3.548
  46. Sert D., Aygun A., Demir M.K. (2011). Effects of ultrasonic treatment and storage temperature on egg quality. Poultry Sci., 90: 869–875.10.3382/ps.2010-00799
  47. Stepien-Pysniak D. (2010). Occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria in hens’ eggs depending on their source and storage conditions. Pol. J. Vet. Sci., 13: 507–513.
  48. Svobodová J., Tůmová E. (2014). Factors affecting microbial contamination of market eggs: a review. Sci. Agric. Bohem., 45: 226–237.10.1515/sab-2015-0003
  49. Theron H., Venter P., Lues J.F.R. (2003). Bacterial growth on chicken eggs in various storage environments. Food Res. Int., 36: 969–975.10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00117-0
  50. Vlčková J., Tůmová E., Ketta M., Englmaierová M., Chodová D. (2018). Effect of housing system and age of laying hens on eggshell quality, microbial contamination, and penetration of microorganisms into eggs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 63: 51–60.10.17221/77/2017-CJAS
  51. Vlčková J., Tůmová E., Míková K., Englmaierová M., Okrouhlá M., Chodová D. (2019). Changes in the quality of eggs during storage depending on the housing system and the age of hens. Poultry Sci., 98: 6187–6193.10.3382/ps/pez401
  52. Yamak U.S., Boz M.A., Ucar A., Sarcia M., Onder H. (2016). The effect of eggshell thickness on the hatchability of guinea fowl and pheasants. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 18: 49–53.10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0214
  53. You S.J., Udenigwe C.C., Aluko R.E., Wu J. (2010). Multifunctional peptides from egg white lysozyme. Food Res. Int., 43: 848–855.10.1016/j.foodres.2009.12.004
  54. Zaheer K. (2015). An updated review on chicken eggs: production, consumption, management aspects and nutritional benefits to human health. Food Nutr. Sci., 6: 1208–1220.10.4236/fns.2015.613127
  55. Zita L., Tůmová E., Štolc L. (2009). Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Vet. Brno, 78: 85–91.10.2754/avb200978010085
  56. Zita L., Jeníková M., Härtlová H. (2018). Effect of housing system on egg quality and the concentration of cholesterol in egg yolk and blood of hens native resources of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 3: 380–388.10.3382/japr/pfy009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2021-0056 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 561 - 574
Submitted on: Jan 7, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2021
Published on: May 12, 2022
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Adam Kraus, Lukáš Zita, Ondřej Krunt, Darina Chodová, Monika Okrouhlá, Józefa Krawczyk, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.