References
- Board R.G., Tullett S.G. (1975). The pore arrangement in the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggshell as shown by plastic models. J. Microsc., 103: 281-284.
- Burton F.G., Tullett S.G. (1983). Acomparison of the effects of eggshell porosity on the respiration and growth of domestic fowl, duck and turkey embryos. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 75, 2: 167-174.
- Christensen V.L., Davis G.S., Lucore L.A. (1996). Eggshell conductance and other functional qualities of ostrich eggs. Poultry Sci., 75: 1404-1410.
- Heredia A., Rodriguez- Hernandez A.G., Lozano L.F., Pena - Rico M.A., Ve -lazquez R., Basiuk V.A., Bucio L. (2005). Microstructure and thermal change of texture of calcite crystals in ostrich eggshell Struthio camelus. Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 25: 1-9.
- Horbańczuk J.O. (2002). The ostrich. Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Warsaw, 182 pp.
- Kożuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Leśnierowski G., Kijowski J., Rosiński A. (2009). Quality of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus L.) eggs with different shell colour. Arch. Geflugelkd., 73, 3: 201-207.
- Krystianiak S., Kożuszek R., Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S. (2005). Quality and ultrastructure of eggshell and hatchability of eggs in relation to eggshell colour in pheasants. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 23, 1: 5-14.
- Michalak K., Mróz E. (2004). Shell microstructure of turkey hatching eggs differing in surface appearance (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 72, 4: 15-26.
- Mikhailov K.E. (1997). Avian eggshells: an atlas of Scanning Electron Micrographs. The British Ornithologists’ Club, Occasional Publications, 3, p. 6.
- Minnaar P., Minnaar M. (1993). The emu farmer’s hand-book. Induna Company. Groveton, Texas, 177 pp.
- Panheleux M., Bain M., Fernandez M.S., Morales I., Gautron J., Arias J.L., Solo -mon S.E., Hincke M., Nys Y. (1999). Organic matrix composition and ultrastructure of eggshell:acomparative study. Brit. Poultry Sci., 40, 2: 240-252.
- Puchajda H., Pudyszak K., Mróz E., Cywa - Benko K. (2000). Eggshell ultrastructure and macroscopic structure of eggs from White Kołuda and Biłgoraj geese (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 27, 1: 65-78.
- Rosiński A., Elminowska - Wenda G., Gielecki J., Cywa - Benko K. (1993). Application of digital image analysis system in the examination of hen outer egg shell membrane (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 8: 36-41.
- Soliman F.N.K., Rizk R.E., Brake J. (1994). Relationship between shell porosity, shell thickness, egg weight loss, and embryonic development in Japanese quail eggs. Poultry Sci., 73: 1607-1611.
- Solomon S.E. (1997). Egg and Eggshell Quality. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA, 149 pp.
- Szczerbińska D. (2002). Characterisation of the reproductive performance of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) with particular reference to eggshell ultrastructure and its association with egg hatchability indices (in Polish). AR Szczecin, Treatises, 210.
- Tullett S.G. (1984). The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 78, 1: 5-13.
- Tyler C. (1953). Studies on eggshells II. Amethod for marking and counting pores. J. Sci. Food Agric., 4: 266-272.
- Wiercińska M., Szczerbińska D. (2010). The characteristics of Rhea eggshell ultrastructure and hatchability (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech., 9, 2: 65-74.