Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Review of Compared Progestins Type and Dose Utility against the Pituitary Suppression during Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology Cover

The Review of Compared Progestins Type and Dose Utility against the Pituitary Suppression during Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. 1. Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, Brown J, Lam WS, Broekmans FJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4, p CD001750. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub4 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126581.
  2. 2. Dong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Kuang HP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124(7):1048-1055. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14622 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28276192.10.1111/1471-0528.1462228276192
  3. 3. Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Colamaria S, Alviggi C, Rienzi L. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1488-1495 e1481. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.002 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27020168.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.00227020168
  4. 4. Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. The Utrogestan and hMG protocol in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF/ICSI treatments. Medicine (Baltimore. 2016;95(28):e4193. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004193 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428219.10.1097/MD.0000000000004193495681327428219
  5. 5. Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Comparison of neonatal outcomes following progesterone use during ovarian stimulation with frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7835. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08472-2 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28798414.10.1038/s41598-017-08472-2555282428798414
  6. 6. Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Angun B, Eraslan A, Urman B, Ata, B. Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(4):677-683. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31371053.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.00931371053
  7. 7. Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Duphaston and human menopausal gonadotropin protocol in normally ovulatory women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatments in combination with embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steri. 2017;108(3):505-512 e502. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.017 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697910.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.01728697910
  8. 8. Guo YC, Chen PY, Li TT, Jia L, Sun P, Zhu WS. Liang X. Y. Different progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocols in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of 1188 cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(4):1201-1212. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05065-4 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852654.10.1007/s00404-019-05065-430852654
  9. 9. Yu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(2):229-237. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex367 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300975.10.1093/humrep/dex36729300975
  10. 10. Zhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. Use of Utrogestan during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in normally ovulating women undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatments in combination with a “freeze all” strategy: a randomized controlled dose-finding study of 100 mg versus 200 mg. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):379-386 e374. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.030 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27865446.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.03027865446
  11. 11. Evans MB, Parikh T, DeCherney AH, Csokmay JM, Healy, MW, Hill MJ. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of ovulation suppression with progestins compared with GnRH analogs in assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):691-698. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.044 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926176.10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.04430926176
  12. 12. Iwami N, Kawamata M, Ozawa N, Yamamoto T, Watanabe E, Moriwaka O, Kamiya H. (2018). New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(3):663-671. doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4856-8 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30069600.
  13. 13. La Marca A, Capuzzo M. Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era? Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):321-331. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.212 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31138494.10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.21231138494
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amtsb-2020-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2285-7079 | Journal ISSN: 2285-7079
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 47
Submitted on: Mar 20, 2020
|
Accepted on: May 28, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 3, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Alexandru Polexa, Sebile Guler Cekic, Sule Yildiz, Engin Turkgeldi, Baris Ata, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.