References
- 1. Binnebosel M, Trota K, Jansen P et al. Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33:235-43. doi: 10.1007/s00281-010-0237-5.
- 2. Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al. European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7.
- 3. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, 2005.
- 4. Ielpo B, Nunẽz-Alfonsel J, Duran H et al. Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surgery. 2018;268(5):725-30. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002894.
- 5. Leppäniemi A. Cost considerations in trauma and emergency laparoscopy. Eur Surg. 2005;37(1):37-42. doi:10.1007/s10353-004-0121-4.
- 6. Sajid M, Leaver C, Baig M, Sains P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:29-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7718.
- 7. Sgourakis G, Dedemadi G, Gockel I et al. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus open preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia recurrence:a decision analysis based on net health benefits. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2526-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2776-4.
- 8. Sharma Р, Boyers D, Scott N et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta19920.
- 9. Wolf L, Ejiofor J, Wang Yet al. Management of reducible ventral hernias: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of repair at diagnosis versus watchful waiting. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):358-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002507.
- 10. Reynolds D, Davenport D, Korosec R, Roth J. Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1999-y.
- 11. Fischer S, Zechmeister-Koss I. Is day surgery safe? A systematic literature review. Europ Surg. 2014;46:103–12. doi: 10.1007/s10353-014-0265-9.
- 12. Poelman M, Apers J, van den Brand H et al. The INCH-Trial:a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair. BMC Surg. 2013;7:13-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-18.
- 13. Mcintosh E, Donaldson C, Scott N, Grant A. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001;88(5):653-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01768.x.
- 14. Treadwell J, Tipton K, Oyesanmi O et al. Surgical options for inguinal hernia: comparative effectiveness review. No.70AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC091-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- 15. McCormac K, Wake B, Perez, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1-203. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
- 16. Damianov D. Hernia. Sofia: Medart, 1997.
- 17. Kirilova-Doneva M, Kamusheva M, Petrova G, Sopotensky S. Comparison of costs for elective versus emergency hernia repair and its reimbursement in Вulgaria. EESJ. 2016;9(13):43-9.
- 18. Kirilova-Doneva M. Investigation of the costs and quality of life of patients operated with hernia meshes in Bulgaria. Sofia: Star, 2020.
- 19. Iarumov N, Koichev A, Angelov K et al. Economic and social effectiveness of treatment of patients with hernial defects of the anterior abdominal wall in one-day surgery - results from 7 years of experience. Surgery (Sofia). 2007;LX(1-2):39-42.
- 20. Aleksandrov G. Problems in the management of one-day surgery: doctoral theses. Sofia: Medical University – Sofia, 2018.
- 21. EQ-5D, an instrument to describe and value health. Accessed January 24th, 2017 at: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/.
- 22. Naseva E. Health-related quality of life ‒ Comparasion of the methods for EQ-5D calculations. General medicine. 2014;14(3):3-8.
- 23. National Statistical Institute, at: http://www.nsi.bg/bg/content/
- 24. Chatterjee A, Krishnan N, Rosen J. Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without synthetic mesh: a cost-utility analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):137-46. doi: 10.1097/01. prs.0000436835.96194.79.
- 25. Fischer J, Basta M, Krishnan N et al. A Cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(2):647-59. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475775.44891.56.
- 26. Arnaudov P. Recurrent inguinal hernia-options for surgical treatment: doctoral theses. Varna: MU – Varna, 2015.
- 27. Achelrod D, Stargardt T. Cost-utility analysis comparing heavy-weight and light-weight mesh in laparoscopic surgery for unilateral inguinal hernias. Appl. Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(2):151-63. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0082-0.