Cost-Utility Analysis of Open Hernia Operations in Bulgaria

Kirilova-Doneva, M.; Kamusheva, M.; Gerasimov, N.; Petrova, G.

doi:10.2478/amb-2022-0015

Abstract

Background: Hernia surgery procedures are among the most frequently performed in Bulgaria. An open, mesh-based repair is a standard method for hernia repair. From a societal perspective, a cost-utility analysis of open hernia surgical procedures performed in Bulgaria is necessary in light of the economic and social burden that poses this health issue. The aim of the study was to perform an economic evaluation of the quality of health results after a conventional elective hernia operation with implanted light and standard meshes.

Methods: The cost of elective hernia operation with standard and light meshes was calculated as a sum of direct and indirect costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for conventional hernia operation was calculated as health improvement was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) reported in a previous study. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the changes in the ICER values in case of planned inguinal hernia operation.

Results: The cost of operation with standard meshes is less than operation with light meshes. The difference is in the range 55-200 EUR. The additional costs per one QALY gained for light meshes are far below the recommended threshold values which identified these meshes as cost-effective.

Conclusions: The study presents evidence for cost-effectiveness of light meshes.

References

1. Binnebosel M, Trota K, Jansen P et al. Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33:235-43. doi: 10.1007/s00281-010-0237-5.21225262
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al. European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7.271973019636493
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Ielpo B, Nunẽz-Alfonsel J, Duran H et al. Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surgery. 2018;268(5):725-30. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002894.30095476
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Leppäniemi A. Cost considerations in trauma and emergency laparoscopy. Eur Surg. 2005;37(1):37-42. doi:10.1007/s10353-004-0121-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Sajid M, Leaver C, Baig M, Sains P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2012;99:29-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7718.22038579
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Sgourakis G, Dedemadi G, Gockel I et al. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus open preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia recurrence:a decision analysis based on net health benefits. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2526-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2776-4.23344511
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Sharma Р, Boyers D, Scott N et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta19920.478111726556776
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Wolf L, Ejiofor J, Wang Yet al. Management of reducible ventral hernias: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of repair at diagnosis versus watchful waiting. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):358-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002507.799632029194083
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Reynolds D, Davenport D, Korosec R, Roth J. Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1999-y.22965649
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Fischer S, Zechmeister-Koss I. Is day surgery safe? A systematic literature review. Europ Surg. 2014;46:103–12. doi: 10.1007/s10353-014-0265-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Poelman M, Apers J, van den Brand H et al. The INCH-Trial:a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair. BMC Surg. 2013;7:13-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-18.368033024499061
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Mcintosh E, Donaldson C, Scott N, Grant A. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001;88(5):653-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01768.x.11350435
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Treadwell J, Tipton K, Oyesanmi O et al. Surgical options for inguinal hernia: comparative effectiveness review. No.70AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC091-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. McCormac K, Wake B, Perez, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1-203. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.15842951
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Damianov D. Hernia. Sofia: Medart, 1997.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Kirilova-Doneva M, Kamusheva M, Petrova G, Sopotensky S. Comparison of costs for elective versus emergency hernia repair and its reimbursement in Вulgaria. EESJ. 2016;9(13):43-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Kirilova-Doneva M. Investigation of the costs and quality of life of patients operated with hernia meshes in Bulgaria. Sofia: Star, 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Iarumov N, Koichev A, Angelov K et al. Economic and social effectiveness of treatment of patients with hernial defects of the anterior abdominal wall in one-day surgery - results from 7 years of experience. Surgery (Sofia). 2007;LX(1-2):39-42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Aleksandrov G. Problems in the management of one-day surgery: doctoral theses. Sofia: Medical University – Sofia, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. EQ-5D, an instrument to describe and value health. Accessed January 24th, 2017 at: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Naseva E. Health-related quality of life ‒ Comparasion of the methods for EQ-5D calculations. General medicine. 2014;14(3):3-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. National Statistical Institute, at: http://www.nsi.bg/bg/content/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Chatterjee A, Krishnan N, Rosen J. Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without synthetic mesh: a cost-utility analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):137-46. doi: 10.1097/01. prs.0000436835.96194.79.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Fischer J, Basta M, Krishnan N et al. A Cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(2):647-59. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475775.44891.56.26818303
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Arnaudov P. Recurrent inguinal hernia-options for surgical treatment: doctoral theses. Varna: MU – Varna, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Achelrod D, Stargardt T. Cost-utility analysis comparing heavy-weight and light-weight mesh in laparoscopic surgery for unilateral inguinal hernias. Appl. Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(2):151-63. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0082-0.24526592
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Cost-Utility Analysis of Open Hernia Operations in Bulgaria

Abstract

Paradigm

My account