Computer Simulation in the Design of Tools and the Stamping Process of Non-Typical Shaped Drawpieces - A Case Study

Piotr Danielczyk; Ireneusz WRÓBEL

doi:10.2478/ama-2025-0056

Figures & Tables

Distribution of cooling channels a) in the upper part of the tool b) in the lower part of the tool

Temperature distribution in the drawpiece

Parts of the tool a) lower part of the tool, b) upper part of the tool

Temperature distribution in moving punches

Drawpiece deformation after hardening (in relation to nominal shape)

FEM model for calculating the expansion of a) the lower part of the tools b) the upper part of the tools

Boundary conditions for the analysis of (a) the lower part of the tool (b) the upper part of the tool

Deformation in the lower part of the tool

Deformation in the upper part of the tool

Position of the measurement points on the drawpiece

Locations where samples were taken for testing

Results of HV hardness measurements

Measurement number	Imprint/value
1		579.1
2		538.7
3		533.4
4		561.9
5		573.3
6		583.6

Results of strength limit measurements Rm, MPa

		Measurement point number
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Drawpiece number	W1	1747	1712	1700	1762	1795	1800	1732	1776	1745	1766
	W2	1712	1703	1757	1784	1779	1746	1708	1743	1723	1785
	W3	1719	1731	1701	1745	1781	1708	1719	1761	1738	1777
	W4	1770	1739	1779	1711	1767	1747	1779	1773	1710	1764
	W5	1757	1771	1720	1709	1711	1701	1739	1780	1732	1799
	W6	1792	1734	1758	1778	1746	1728	1703	1751	1700	1717
	W7	1742	1751	1740	1786	1757	1702	1709	1744	1759	1729
	W8	1789	1774	1799	1717	1771	1709	1700	1799	1743	1729
	W9	1735	1724	1705	1713	1795	1758	1775	1730	1750	1745
	W10	1764	1755	1773	1755	1764	1787	1720	1720	1759	1773
	W11	1715	1770	1731	1720	1790	1758	1715	1771	1742	1755
	W12	1728	1779	1745	1703	1784	1737	1704	1704	1729	1781
	W13	1721	1753	1776	1740	1717	1714	1782	1740	1755	1726
	W14	1742	1732	1718	1704	1761	1734	1730	1769	1797	1743
	W15	1755	1747	1757	1800	1765	1724	1783	1792	1795	1742
	W16	1777	1750	1733	1717	1756	1787	1771	1789	1774	1756
	W17	1726	1790	1760	1769	1717	1741	1707	1785	1709	1771
	W18	1741	1789	1789	1700	1708	1731	1767	1758	1742	1765
	W19	1707	1797	1800	1800	1772	1735	1717	1793	1716	1731
	W20	1775	1727	1711	1795	1700	1758	1738	1742	1787	1764

Results of four-point bending test

Sample	During study	After completion of the study
1
2
3
4

Tensile test results

Sample number	Yield strength Rp02, MPa	Tensile strength Rm, MPa
1	1355	1851
2	1316	1873
3	1262	1830
4	1284	1838
5	1336	1804
6	1279	1858

Computer Simulation in the Design of Tools and the Stamping Process of Non-Typical Shaped Drawpieces - A Case Study

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 16.

Fig. 17.

Fig. 18.

Fig. 19.

Fig. 20.

Fig. 21.

Fig. 22.

Fig. 23.

Fig. 24.

Fig. 25.

Fig. 26.

Fig. 27.

Fig. 28.

Fig. 29.

Fig. 30.

Fig. 31.

Fig. 32.

Fig. 33.

Fig. 33.

Results of HV hardness measurements

Results of strength limit measurements Rm, MPa

Results of four-point bending test

Tensile test results