Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Commercial Additives and y-Irradiation on Structural and Mechanical Properties of rHDPE/rGFRP Cover

Influence of Commercial Additives and y-Irradiation on Structural and Mechanical Properties of rHDPE/rGFRP

Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

Tab. 1.

Sample description with commercial additives names and mass shares

AdditiveSample name rHDPE/rGFRP/x%abbrv.Additive concentration (wt%)
nonerHDPE/rGFRP0
IrgaCycle PS 032 G0.2P0.2
0.5P0.5
Licocene® PE MS 4311MAH1.0
2MAH2.0
3MAH3.0
SilmaLink AX22920.3S0.3
1S1.0
2S2.0
Fig. 1.

Geometry of injected specimens to mechanical and radiation tests

Fig. 2.

a)Gamma Chamber 5000 equipment; b) schematic of radioactive decay of 60Co

Tab. 2.

Radiation test samples names.

Material/Absorbed dose0 kGy40 kGy60 kGy80 kGy100 kGy
rHDPE/rGFRP 40%A0A40A60A80A100
rHDPEB0B40B60B80B100
Fig. 3.

Mechanical parameters of rHDPE/rGFRP material with additives described below the chart: a) tensile modulus; b) tensile strength; c) offset yield strength

Fig. 4.

Surface of the materials rHDPE/rGFRP 40%: a) without additives; b) 3S; c) 3MAH

Fig. 5.

SEM images of the composite material with additives: a) rHDPE; b) rHDPE/rGFRP; c) 0.2P; d) 0.5P; e) 1S; f) 2S; g) 1MAH; h) 2MAH; i) 3MAH

Fig. 6.

SEM images of the composite material with additives close-up view on fibre: a) rHDPE; b) rHDPE/rGFRP; c) 0.2P; d) 0.5P; e) 1S; f) 2S; g) 1MAH; h) 2MAH; i) 3MAH

Fig. 7.

Optical microscope images of the composite material: a) rHDPE/rGFRP; b) 0.2P; c)0.5P; d) 0.3S; e) 1S; f) 2S; g) 1MAH; h) 2MAH; i) 3MAH

Fig. 8.

Mechanical parameters of irradiated specimens: a) tensile modulus of irradiated materials; b) offset yield strength; c) strain at tensile strength

Fig. 9.

Engineering stress-strain relationship for non-irradiated (rHDPE/rGFRP and rHDPE) and irradiated samples (A40-A100 and B40-B100).

Fig. 10.

The surface of irradiated specimens after the tensile test: a) macro view on the degraded surface; b) close-up view on fibres; c) close-up view on resin fragment on the surface of the rHDPE/rGFRP sample after the tensile test

Fig. 11.

Failure locations of specimens after the tensile test: a) rHDPE; b) B40; c) B60; d) B80; e) B100; f) A40; g) A60; h) A80; i) A100

Fig. 12.

a)2nd heating curves and b) cooling curve for analyzing composites before irradiation test

Tab. 3.

DSC parameters determined for the rHDPE/rGFRP modified with various additives

Sample nameTmCTcCXc,%
rHDPE/rGFRP13611461.1
0.2P13511461.0
0.5P13711362.2
1MAH13611463.3
2MAH13711362.4
3MAH13511568.3
0.3S13611463.9
1S13611464.0
2S13611461.4
Fig. 13.

a) 2nd heating curves and b) cooling curve for analyzing composites after irradiation test

Tab. 4.

DSC parameters of irradiated samples

Sample nameTmCTcCXc,%
rHDPE/rGFRP13611461.1
A4013411461.2
A6013311456.7
A8013211457.7
A10013511258.2
B013211864.1
B4013811155.8
B6013311455.5
B8013511253.7
B10013111453.9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2025-0042 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 350 - 361
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 6, 2025
Published on: Sep 5, 2025
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Maciej Jan SPYCHAŁA, Danuta MIEDZIŃSKA, Grzegorz SŁAWIŃSKI, Dorota GAJDA, Paulina LATKO-DURAŁEK, Anna CZAJKA-WAROWNA, Tomasz SZREDER, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.