Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Composite Lay-Up on the Load-Carrying Capacity of Structures with Closed Rectangular Cross-Section Cover

Influence of Composite Lay-Up on the Load-Carrying Capacity of Structures with Closed Rectangular Cross-Section

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Overall dimensions of test specimen
Overall dimensions of test specimen

Fig. 2.

Test stand
Test stand

Fig. 3.

Numerical model with boundary conditions
Numerical model with boundary conditions

Fig. 4.

Summary of post-buckling equilibrium paths
Summary of post-buckling equilibrium paths

Fig. 5.

Comparison of numerical-experimental failure: a) FEM – 1 lay-up, b) EXP – 1 lay-up, c) FEM – 2 lay-up, d) EXP – 2 lay-up, e) FEM – 3 lay-up, f) EXP – 3 lay-up
Comparison of numerical-experimental failure: a) FEM – 1 lay-up, b) EXP – 1 lay-up, c) FEM – 2 lay-up, d) EXP – 2 lay-up, e) FEM – 3 lay-up, f) EXP – 3 lay-up

Fig. 6.

Damaged structures with graphical visualization of deformations and enlarged representation of selected damage areas: a) 1 lay-up, b) 2 lay-up, c) 3 lay-up
Damaged structures with graphical visualization of deformations and enlarged representation of selected damage areas: a) 1 lay-up, b) 2 lay-up, c) 3 lay-up

Fig. 7.

Comparison of the damage level of individual layers
Comparison of the damage level of individual layers

Material properties of the carbon–epoxy composite:average values with standard deviation from a number of material test trials more extensively described in papers [13,19]

Mechanical propertiesStrength parameters
Young’s modulus E1 (MPa)103014.11 (2145.73)Tensile strength (0°) Ftu (MPa)1277.41 (56.23)
Young’s modulus E2 (MPa)7361.45 (307.97)Compressive strength (0°) Fcu (MPa)572.44 (46.20)
Poisson’s ratio u12 [-]0.37 (0.17)Tensile strength (90°) Ftu (MPa)31.46 (9.64)
Kirchhoff modulus G12 (MPa)4040.53 (167.35)Compressive strength (90°) Fcu (MPa)104.04 (7.34)
Shear strength (45°) Fsu(MPa)134.48 (2.71)

Failure force values obtained experimentally and numerically

Spec. No\Lay-up1 (N)2 (N)3 (N)EXP Avg.Value (N)FEM (N)
[0/90/0/90]s39799.6039150.5740573.0739841.0840462.60
[45/-45/90/0]s33661.5334416.6234364.6534147.6034456.80
[90/-45/45/0]s29448.8231415.5431172.5130678.9631884.60
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2025-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 189 - 196
Submitted on: Nov 28, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 30, 2025
Published on: Jun 6, 2025
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Kuba ROSŁANIEC, Patryk RÓŻYŁO, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.