Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Selected Brushing Process Parameters on the Tool's Operating Time Cover

The Influence of Selected Brushing Process Parameters on the Tool's Operating Time

Open Access
|Mar 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Work station (1 - industrial manipulator, 2 - rotary table, 3 - workpiece gripper, 4 - workpiece magazine, 5 - tool holder)
Work station (1 - industrial manipulator, 2 - rotary table, 3 - workpiece gripper, 4 - workpiece magazine, 5 - tool holder)

Fig. 2.

Tool torque in relations with numer of brushed parts
Tool torque in relations with numer of brushed parts

Fig. 3.

A brush-type tool used in the production process
A brush-type tool used in the production process

Fig. 4.

Implementation scheme of experiment (3 input factors on 2 levels) [42]
Implementation scheme of experiment (3 input factors on 2 levels) [42]

Fig. 5.

The depth to which the brush tool was wear
The depth to which the brush tool was wear

Fig. 6.

Place of measurement of bristle thickness after the test
Place of measurement of bristle thickness after the test

Fig. 7.

Typical parts condition before (left side) and after (right side) of brushing process
Typical parts condition before (left side) and after (right side) of brushing process

Fig. 8.

Location of control points – blade lock
Location of control points – blade lock

Fig. 9.

Results of test- histogram
Results of test- histogram

Fig. 10.

Bristle thickness depending on selected parameters after deburring operation for 30 and 60 pieces
Bristle thickness depending on selected parameters after deburring operation for 30 and 60 pieces

Fig. 11.

Graphical presentation of equation (35) (t – bristle thickness mm, d – brush diameter mm, q – number of processed parts)
Graphical presentation of equation (35) (t – bristle thickness mm, d – brush diameter mm, q – number of processed parts)

Test results – measured bristle thickness

Test numbery1y2y3y4y5y6y7y8y9y10y11y12ȳ
10.640.550.550.630.730.640.590.510.410.410.550.560.56
20.90.60.830.480.660.740.730.640.430.950.860.860.72
30.60.520.620.530.530.540.530.580.550.550.60.540.56
40.570.480.460.750.60.550.610.690.660.550.620.70.60
50.40.540.420.640.640.690.760.80.70.820.740.850.67
60.80.920.750.690.830.80.620.50.620.450.70.650.69
70.470.670.30.450.460.40.360.40.380.350.560.50.44
80.30.40.550.590.30.630.530.560.640.770.890.490.55

Test matrix, columns X1, X2, X3 define the top level (“+”) and bottom level (“−”) of selected process parameters

Test numberX1X2X3Rotationai speed rpmEngagement as brush diameter mmNumber of brushed parts
1+++200020060
2++200020030
3++200019860
4+200019830
5++140020060
6+140020030
7+140019860
8140019830

Results of the tests - the radius of edge break in chosen locations of the detail

Test numberMeasured value of Edge break, mm
-ABCDEF
10.160.110.170.160.310.29
20.150.100.130.150.340.36
30.180.190.170.140.250.27
40.270.160.190.190.330.3
50.170.120.180.140.240.27
60.130.110.130.130.290.25
70.130.120.150.130.300.30
80.140.100.200.130.320.35

Error variance for individual trials

Test numberS2
10.0079
20.0253
30.0010
40.0070
50.0200
60.0171
70.0094
80.0276
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 69
Submitted on: Mar 27, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 10, 2024
Published on: Mar 31, 2025
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Karol Falandys, Tomasz Zymróz, Krzysztof Kurc, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.