Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Microbially-Produced Organic Acids as Leaching Agents for Metal Recovery Processes Cover

Microbially-Produced Organic Acids as Leaching Agents for Metal Recovery Processes

Open Access
|Nov 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Published articles from 2017 to 2021 related to bioleaching with OAData was taken from Clarivate Analytics in 2021; keywords used for this search were organic acids, bioleaching, metal recovery, and fungi.

Fig. 2

Acidolysis and complexolysis mechanisms during metal extraction processes

Reactions involved in acidolysis and complexolysis mechanisms for metal recovery

Organic acidAcidolysis reactionspKaComplexolysis reactions
Gluconic C6H12O7 → C6H11O7 + H+3.86n[C6H11O7] + Mn+ → M[C6H11O7]n
Oxalic
  • a)

    C2H2O4 → C2HO4 + H+

  • b)

    C2HO4 → C2O42− + H+

1.254.14
  • a)

    n[C2HO4] + Mn+ → M[C2HO4]n

  • b)

    n[C2O42−] + Mn+ → M2[C2O4]n

Malic
  • a)

    C4H6O5 → C4H5O5 + H+

  • b)

    C4H5O5 → C4H4O52− + H+

3.405.11
  • a)

    n[C4H5O5] + Mn+ → M[C4H5O5]n

  • b)

    n[C4H5O52−] + Mn+ → M2[C4H4O5]n

Citric
  • a)

    C6H8O7 → C6H7O7 + H+

  • b)

    C6H7O7 → C6H6O72− + H+

  • c)

    C6H6O72− → C6H5O73− + H+

3.094.756.40
  • a)

    n[C6H7O7] + Mn+ → M[C6H7O7]n

  • b)

    n[C6H6O72−] + Mn+ → M2[C6H6O7]n

  • c)

    n[C6H5O73−] + Mn+ → M3[C6H5O7]n

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from industrial wastes using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mg/L)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density % (w/v)Recovery (%)References
Mixed fungal cultures: Purpureocillium lilacinum (71.9%) and Aspergillus niger (27.9%) were dominant species. Others (0.2%) include: Pseudallescheria sp., Malassezia obtuse, Tomentella sp., Davidiellaceae sp., Talaromyces sp., Fungi sp., Herpotrichiellaceae sp., Meyerozyma guilliermondii Wickerhamomyces anomalus, and Malassezia furfur.Oxalic 1022.4Citric 5533.2 30Gluconic 894.63027300856.1 Cu15.7 Al20.5 Pb49.5 Zn8.1 Sn[93]
Aspergillus nigerCitric 8131, 8064Oxalic 1095, 973Malic 1212, 1086Gluconic 2065, 2153Room temperature211200.09298.57 Zn43.95 Ni64.03 Cu[94]
Aspergillus nigerLess than 14000 of gluconic acid, less than 4000 of citric and oxalic acid, less than 3000 of malic acid30301301100 Li94 Cu72 Mn62 Al45 Ni38 Co[11]
Penicillium simplicissimumCitric 5237Gluconic 3666Oxalic 1287Malic 18830151301100 V40 Ni[76]
Kombucha-consortium(the bacterium Komagataeibacter hansenii, and the yeast Zygosaccharomyces lentus)Gluconic 25500Acetic 9608Room temperature143002.8(stationary bioleaching) 5.2 of REE*[44]
(shaken-mode bioleaching) 7.9 of REE
Aspergillus nigerOxalic 17185Gluconic 4539Citric 1042Malic 502607130983 V30 Ni[75]
Aspergillus nigerGluconic 2126Malic 1251Oxalic 1170Citric 80783030130269.8 Al60.0 Ti25.4 Fe[89]

Comparison of the reported characteristics of organic and inorganic acids in leaching processes

Organic acids (OA)Inorganic acids (IA)References
Less emission of hazardous gasesHigh emission of sulfur, chloride, and nitrous oxides[35]
Serve for soil nutrient acquisition, mineral weatheringCan lead to high consumption either of water or chemicals[29]
Less risky manipulation during the process.Risky manipulation during the process.[82]
BiodegradableNon-biodegradable[20, 35]
Delay the corrosion of equipmentCause prompt corrosion of equipment[82]
Can be used more than once in metal recovery processesCannot be reused in metal recovery processes[35]
Are costlier than IA, but the process is considered cost-effective due to the environmental impactHave low cost, but the process is not considered cost-effective due to environmental impact[37]
Solely act as leaching agents; hence, separation nd purification are still neededSolely act as leaching agents; hence, separation and purification are still needed[35]

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from ores using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mM)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density (% w/v)Recovery (%)References
Enterobacter AerogenesMixture of malic, gluconic and acetic acids < 18 for both direct and indirect bioleaching30181201(direct bioleaching)2.55 Ce0.57 La0.36 Nd[30]
2(indirect bioleaching)0.66 Ce0.16 La0.12 Nd
Aspergillus sp.Non-characterized supernatant3720150279 Mn[65]

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from catalysts using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mM)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density (% w/v)Recovery (%)References
Gluconobacter oxydansGluconic < 303011501.5RPP* maximum 2% of REE**[77]
FCC*** catalyst 49% of total REE
Alternaria alternataNot reported30215018285.3 mg/kg V6662.0 mg/kg Al4973.8 mg/kg Si3990.2 mg/kg Mo177.7 mg/kg Mg118.2 mg/kg Fe[81]
529.9 mg/kg As9872.7 mg/kg Al6839.0 mg/kg Si2115.8 mg/kg Mo1903.0 mg/kg V279.6 mg/kg Mg
Aspergillus nigerCitric and Gluconic < 98306013013% La[66]
352% La
533% La
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/am-2022-019 | Journal eISSN: 2545-3149 | Journal ISSN: 0079-4252
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 179 - 190
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2022
Published on: Nov 30, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Itzel A. Cruz-Rodríguez, Norma G. Rojas-Avelizapa, Andrea M. Rivas-Castillo, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.