Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Microbially-Produced Organic Acids as Leaching Agents for Metal Recovery Processes Cover

Microbially-Produced Organic Acids as Leaching Agents for Metal Recovery Processes

Open Access
|Nov 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Published articles from 2017 to 2021 related to bioleaching with OAData was taken from Clarivate Analytics in 2021; keywords used for this search were organic acids, bioleaching, metal recovery, and fungi.
Published articles from 2017 to 2021 related to bioleaching with OAData was taken from Clarivate Analytics in 2021; keywords used for this search were organic acids, bioleaching, metal recovery, and fungi.

Fig. 2

Acidolysis and complexolysis mechanisms during metal extraction processes
Acidolysis and complexolysis mechanisms during metal extraction processes

Reactions involved in acidolysis and complexolysis mechanisms for metal recovery

Organic acidAcidolysis reactionspKaComplexolysis reactions
Gluconic C6H12O7 → C6H11O7 + H+3.86n[C6H11O7] + Mn+ → M[C6H11O7]n
Oxalic
  • a)

    C2H2O4 → C2HO4 + H+

  • b)

    C2HO4 → C2O42− + H+

1.254.14
  • a)

    n[C2HO4] + Mn+ → M[C2HO4]n

  • b)

    n[C2O42−] + Mn+ → M2[C2O4]n

Malic
  • a)

    C4H6O5 → C4H5O5 + H+

  • b)

    C4H5O5 → C4H4O52− + H+

3.405.11
  • a)

    n[C4H5O5] + Mn+ → M[C4H5O5]n

  • b)

    n[C4H5O52−] + Mn+ → M2[C4H4O5]n

Citric
  • a)

    C6H8O7 → C6H7O7 + H+

  • b)

    C6H7O7 → C6H6O72− + H+

  • c)

    C6H6O72− → C6H5O73− + H+

3.094.756.40
  • a)

    n[C6H7O7] + Mn+ → M[C6H7O7]n

  • b)

    n[C6H6O72−] + Mn+ → M2[C6H6O7]n

  • c)

    n[C6H5O73−] + Mn+ → M3[C6H5O7]n

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from industrial wastes using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mg/L)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density % (w/v)Recovery (%)References
Mixed fungal cultures: Purpureocillium lilacinum (71.9%) and Aspergillus niger (27.9%) were dominant species. Others (0.2%) include: Pseudallescheria sp., Malassezia obtuse, Tomentella sp., Davidiellaceae sp., Talaromyces sp., Fungi sp., Herpotrichiellaceae sp., Meyerozyma guilliermondii Wickerhamomyces anomalus, and Malassezia furfur.Oxalic 1022.4Citric 5533.2 30Gluconic 894.63027300856.1 Cu15.7 Al20.5 Pb49.5 Zn8.1 Sn[93]
Aspergillus nigerCitric 8131, 8064Oxalic 1095, 973Malic 1212, 1086Gluconic 2065, 2153Room temperature211200.09298.57 Zn43.95 Ni64.03 Cu[94]
Aspergillus nigerLess than 14000 of gluconic acid, less than 4000 of citric and oxalic acid, less than 3000 of malic acid30301301100 Li94 Cu72 Mn62 Al45 Ni38 Co[11]
Penicillium simplicissimumCitric 5237Gluconic 3666Oxalic 1287Malic 18830151301100 V40 Ni[76]
Kombucha-consortium(the bacterium Komagataeibacter hansenii, and the yeast Zygosaccharomyces lentus)Gluconic 25500Acetic 9608Room temperature143002.8(stationary bioleaching) 5.2 of REE*[44]
(shaken-mode bioleaching) 7.9 of REE
Aspergillus nigerOxalic 17185Gluconic 4539Citric 1042Malic 502607130983 V30 Ni[75]
Aspergillus nigerGluconic 2126Malic 1251Oxalic 1170Citric 80783030130269.8 Al60.0 Ti25.4 Fe[89]

Comparison of the reported characteristics of organic and inorganic acids in leaching processes

Organic acids (OA)Inorganic acids (IA)References
Less emission of hazardous gasesHigh emission of sulfur, chloride, and nitrous oxides[35]
Serve for soil nutrient acquisition, mineral weatheringCan lead to high consumption either of water or chemicals[29]
Less risky manipulation during the process.Risky manipulation during the process.[82]
BiodegradableNon-biodegradable[20, 35]
Delay the corrosion of equipmentCause prompt corrosion of equipment[82]
Can be used more than once in metal recovery processesCannot be reused in metal recovery processes[35]
Are costlier than IA, but the process is considered cost-effective due to the environmental impactHave low cost, but the process is not considered cost-effective due to environmental impact[37]
Solely act as leaching agents; hence, separation nd purification are still neededSolely act as leaching agents; hence, separation and purification are still needed[35]

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from ores using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mM)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density (% w/v)Recovery (%)References
Enterobacter AerogenesMixture of malic, gluconic and acetic acids < 18 for both direct and indirect bioleaching30181201(direct bioleaching)2.55 Ce0.57 La0.36 Nd[30]
2(indirect bioleaching)0.66 Ce0.16 La0.12 Nd
Aspergillus sp.Non-characterized supernatant3720150279 Mn[65]

Bioleaching at laboratory scale for metal recovery from catalysts using OA-producing microorganisms

MicroorganismsLeaching agent (mM)Temperature (°C)Time (days)RPMPulp density (% w/v)Recovery (%)References
Gluconobacter oxydansGluconic < 303011501.5RPP* maximum 2% of REE**[77]
FCC*** catalyst 49% of total REE
Alternaria alternataNot reported30215018285.3 mg/kg V6662.0 mg/kg Al4973.8 mg/kg Si3990.2 mg/kg Mo177.7 mg/kg Mg118.2 mg/kg Fe[81]
529.9 mg/kg As9872.7 mg/kg Al6839.0 mg/kg Si2115.8 mg/kg Mo1903.0 mg/kg V279.6 mg/kg Mg
Aspergillus nigerCitric and Gluconic < 98306013013% La[66]
352% La
533% La
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/am-2022-019 | Journal eISSN: 2545-3149 | Journal ISSN: 0079-4252
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 179 - 190
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2022
Published on: Nov 30, 2022
Published by: Polish Society of Microbiologists
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2022 Itzel A. Cruz-Rodríguez, Norma G. Rojas-Avelizapa, Andrea M. Rivas-Castillo, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.