Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
NCR1 and NCR3 Expression and Genetic Polymorphism are Associated with CMV Infection after Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Cover

Figures & Tables

Fig 1.

The gating strategy: (A–H): singlets in peripheral blood after excluding doublets and debris; dark blue—lymphocytes T CD3+; orangeNK cells; pink—monocytes; yellow—granulocytes; blue—basophils. (A) discrimination of debris (FSC-A vs. SSC-A); (B) discrimination of doublets (FSC-A vs. FSC-H); (C) gating of the peripheral blood leukocyte populations (CD45 vs. SSC-A); (D) lymphocytes T CD3+ and NK cells—(CD3 vs. SSc-A); (E) NK cell subpopulations (CD56 vs. CD16); (F) NK cells CD335 positive (CD335 vs. SSc-A); (G) NK cells CD336 positive (CD336 vs. SSc-A); (H) NK cells CD337 positive (CD337 vs. SSc-A).

Fig 2.

Differences in the expression of genes encoding NCR1 and NCR3 receptors and IFN-γ (IFNG) in HSCT patients with CMV infection and in patients without complications. (A) NCR1 expression level in CMV-positive patients vs. patients without complications; (B) NCR3 expression level in CMV-positive patients vs. patients without complications; (C) IFNG expression level in CMV-positive patients vs. patients without complications. CMV, cytomegalovirus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Fig 3.

Correlation between INF-γ (IFNG) expression and NCR1 and NCR3 genes (A,B) in patients with CMV infection after HSCT. A strong correlation between IFNG and both NCR1 and NCR3 can be observed. CMV, cytomegalovirus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Fig 4.

Change over time in the percentage of NK cells expressing the NCR1 receptor in patients with or without CMV infection post-HSCT. CMV, cytomegalovirus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; NK, natural killer.

Fig 5.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients post-HSCT stratified by donor NCR3 rs11575836 genotype. Patients transplanted from the NCR3 rs11575836 AA homozygous donors were characterized with better overall survival. HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Fig 6.

Relationship between NCR1 rs1433097 donor genotype (A) and NCR3 rs11575836 recipient genotype (B) and risk of CMV infection after HSCT. CMV, cytomegalovirus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Distribution of genotypes in NCR genes in HSCT recipients and donors

Geners numberAllel/GenotypeDonors n = 120 [%]Recipients n = 279 [%]
NCR1rs2278428C13 [5.42]34 [6.09]
A227 [94.58]524 [93.91]
CC0 [0.00]8 [2.87]
AA107 [89.17]253 [90.68]
CA13 [10.83]18 [6.45]
rs34549987C125 [52.08]305 [54.66]
T115 [47.92]253 [45.34]
CC38 [31.67]82 [29.39]
TT33 [27.50]56 [20.07]
CT49 [40.83]141 [50.54]
rs1433097C29 [12.39]75 [54.35]
T205 [87.61]63 [45.65]
CC1 [0.85]6 [2.19]
TT89 [76.07]205 [74.82]
CT27 [23.08]63 [22.99]
NCR2rs2236369T109 [45.42]239 [42.83]
C131 [54.58]319 [57.17]
TT19 [15.83]46 [16.49]
CC30 [25.00]86 [30.82]
TC71 [59.17]147 [52.69]
rs9394782T91 [37.92]202 [36.20]
C149 [62.08]356 [63.80]
TT13 [10.83]34 [12.19]
CC42 [35.00]111 [39.78]
TC65 [54.17]134 [48.03]
rs2273962A80 [33.33]159 [28.49]
G160 [66.67]399 [71.51]
AA10 [8.33]26 [9.32]
GG50 [41.67]146 [52.33]
AG60 [50.00]107 [38.35]
NCR3rs11575836A207 [86.25]502 [89.96]
G33 [13.75]56 [10.04]
AA90 [75.00]225 [80.65]
GG3 [2.50]2 [0.72]
AG27 [22.50]52 [18.64]

Patients'characteristics

N = 287%

Recipient sex
M/F167/12058.19/41.81

Donor-Recipient sex match
Male to male12744.25
Male to female6924.04
Female to female4816.72
Female to male3913.59

Donor type
MUD9432.75
MMUD165.58
MSD11540.07
Haploidentical6221.60

Recipient conditioning
MAC14851.57
RIC13547.70
NMA31.04

GvHD prophylaxis
CSA + MTX18865.51
PTCy + TAC + MMF5017.42
CSA + MMF72.44
TAC + MTX31.05
TAC + MMF31.05
Other3612.54

CMV IgG status
Recipient positive23481.15
Donor positive18965.85

Post-transplant complications
aGvHD11439.72
grade I5418.82
grade II4114.29
grades II-IV196.62
cGvHD5920.56
CMV infection10135.19
Relapse4515.68
Death4816.72

Characteristics of selected SNPs in NCR genes

Geners numberAllelic variantsConsequenceAmino acidMAFPosition
NCR1rs2278428C > AMissense variantQ (Gln) > K (Lys)0.08chr19:54906696
rs34549987C > TIntron variant (potential TFBS)N/A0.46chr19:54905596
rs1433097C > TIntron variant (potential TFBS)N/A0.16chr19:54907100
NCR2rs2236369T > CMissense variantS (Ser) > P (Pro)0.41chr6:41341814
rs9394782T > CInitiator codon variantM (Met) > T (Thr)0.33chr6:41335854
rs2273962A > GMissense variantM (Met) > V (Val)0.23chr6:41350700
NCR3rs11575836A > G5'UTR variant (potential TFBS)N/A0.13chr6:31592925
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 7, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 17, 2026
Published on: Jun 25, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Sylwia Biały, Piotr Łacina, Jagoda Siemaszko, Donata Szymczak, Agnieszka Szeremet, Maciej Majcherek, Anna Czyż, Małgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka, Wojciech Fidyk, Iwona Solarska, Barbara Nasiłowska-Adamska, Patrycja Skowrońska, Maria Bieniaszewska, Agnieszka Tomaszewska, Grzegorz W. Basak, Sebastian Giebel, Tomasz Wróbel, Katarzyna Bogunia-Kubik, published by Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.