Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of bacterial uptake, antibacterial efficacy against Escherichia coli, and cytotoxic effects of moxifloxacin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles Cover

Evaluation of bacterial uptake, antibacterial efficacy against Escherichia coli, and cytotoxic effects of moxifloxacin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Composition of lipid nanoparticles

Formulation codeSolid lipid (glyceryl dibehenate)Liquid lipid (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA)Liquid lipid (oleic acid)Tween 80Poloxamer 407Triethanolamine (TEA)
SLN1150 mg--100 mg--
SLN2150 mg---100 mg-
NLC1110 mg40 mg10 mg-100 mg10 mg
NLC2110 mg40 mg--100 mg10 mg

[i] NLC – nanostructured lipid carrier; SLN – solid lipid nanoparticle

Table 2

Lipid nanoparticle properties

LNPParticle size (nm)Polydispersity indexZeta potential (mV)Encapsulation efficiency (%)
SLN1181.6±1.270.25±0.02-14.6±0.3268.61±0.20
SLN2201.8±1.650.29±0.02-17.5±0.1474.53±0.34
NLC1176.8±1.900.57±0.23-11.6±0.6177.82±0.21
NLC2132.4±1.620.51±0.53-6.3±0.3877.17±0.21

[i] Results are represented as means ± standard deviations

Table 3

Stability of lipid nanoparticles stored for one month at +4 °C

Particle size (nm)Polydispersity indexZeta potential (mV)
Type of LNPsBaseline valueAfter one month storageBaseline valueAfter one month storageBaseline valueAfter one month storage
SLN1181.6±1.27186.1±2.890.25±0.020.36±0.25-14.6±0.32-10.0±0.51*
SLN2201.8±1.65200.5±3.560.29±0.020.39±0.12-17.5±0.14-11.5±0.45*
NLC1176.8±1.90180.3±1.640.57±0.230.60±0.46-11.6±0.61-8.30±0.78
NLC2132.4±1.62135.2±3.980.51±0.530.65±0.22-6.3±0.38-5.62±0.96

[i] Results are represent as means ± standard deviations. * significant difference from baseline (p<0.05)

Figure 1

TEM images of SLN1 (a), SLN2 (b), NLC1 (c), and NLC2 (d)

Figure 2

MOX release from nanoparticles

Figure 3

Flow cytometry results (a: blank NPS; b: fluorescein solution; c: SLN1; d: SLN2; e: NLC1; f: NLC2)

Figure 4

Photomicrographs show bacterial uptake of formulations (a: fluorescein solution; b: SLN1; c: SLN2; d: NLC1; e: NLC2)(40× magnification)

Table 4

Antibacterial activity of MOX-loaded SLNs and NLCs

FormulationsInhibition diameter (mm)Minimal inhibition concentration (μg/mL)
Standard MOX solution for SLNs * (0.68 mg)33±0.070.041
SLN134±0.10***0.020
SLN232±0.110.041
Standard MOX solution for NLCs** (0.78 mg)35±0.080.023
NLC136±0.120.023
NLC235±0.050.023

* The concentration was equal to the amount of MOX loaded into SLNs.

** The concentration was equal to the amount of MOX loaded into NLCs.

*** significant difference p<0.05

Table 5

Cytotoxic effects of MOX, MOX-free, and MOX-loaded LNPs in RAW 264.7 cells

RAW 264.7 cell viability (%)
24 h48 h72 h
0.010 µg/mL0.025 µg/mL0.05 µg/mL0.1 µg/mL0.010 µg/mL0.025 µg/mL0.05 µg/mL0.1 µg/mL0.010 µg/mL0.025 µg/mL0.05 µg/mL0.1 µg/mL
MOX88.65±0.0969.05±0.3556.48±0.0143.90±0.0389.42±0.0273.98±0.3359.43±0.0240.01±0.1086.62±0.2383.49±0.0854.58±0.0231.93±0.11
SLN1+MOX81.56±0.2675.43±0.2975.92±0.2374.55±0.2394.62±0.0281.95±0.1171.44±0.0358.43±0.0692.13±0.0891.46±0.3489.06±0.2873.70±0.22
SLN195.30±0.0868.91±0.1262.78±0.2557.75±0.0195.75±0.2991.22±0.0585.44±0.0664.09±0.0387.12±0.2782.65±0.0973.35±0.1169.72±0.17
SLN2+MOX93.14±0.0880.42±0.1966.66±0.4662.10±0.2188.73±0.0677.09±0.1263.16±0.1256.05±0.0492.13±0.0891.46±0.3489.06±0.2873.71±0.22
SLN290.98±0.3086.81±0.1264.91±0.0960.60±0.3196.51±0.2294.42±0.1280.82±0.0868.49±0.2296.02±0.3387.31±0.2769.95±0.0955.88±0.06
NLC1+MOX80.46±0.0981.65±0.1885.84±0.2681.47±0.0988.72±0.0972.27±0.0462.23±0.0251.10±0.1585.24±0.0976.56±0.3073.78±0.0956.03±0.32
NLC189.19±0.1378.73±0.1770.83±0.3353.27±0.0492.75±0.1382.93±0.0463.82±0.0954.44±0.0589.70±0.0980.44±0.0863.51±0.3554.76±0.20
NLC2+MOX78.43±0.3165.99±0.0556.58±0.2950.72±0.0476.23±0.2759.40±0.0353.59±0.0653.05±0.0894.10±0.2779.09±0.0373.90±0.0651.68±0.17
NLC285.54±0.0760.58±0.1056.67±0.2650.07±0.1683.62±0.0662.94±0.1254.81±0.0552.27±0.0491.99±0.4282.25±0.1274.99±0.0554.11±0.09

[i] Results were given as means ± standard deviations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3667 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 (formerly 0004-1254) | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian
Page range: 260 - 269
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2022
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Merve Eylul Kiymaci, Gizem Ruya Topal, Ozgur Esim, Merve Bacanli, Cansel Kose Ozkan, Onur Erdem, Ayhan Savaser, Yalcin Ozkan, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.