Proteostasis, or cellular protein homeostasis, relies on the regulation of protein synthesis, folding, conformational maintenance, and degradation (1). Deviations from optimal proteostasis can result in serious pathologies and accelerate the aging of an organism. Proteostasis is maintained by several control systems, all of them of equal importance (1). Protein degradation is partly regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), which ensures rapid and specific turnover of proteins. UPS modifies cellular and protein functions, including cell cycle, cell signalling, DNA repair, chromatin modifications, and protein trafficking (2). These are mediated by ATPase (ubiquitination enzymes encoded by the Psmc genes in rodents) and the 20S core particle. The latter has a cylinder-like structure consisting of 28 proteins arranged in four heptameric rings. The outer ring is formed by alpha subunits encoded by the Psma genes in rodents (PSMA in humans). The inner, beta subunits are encoded by the Psmb genes (PSMB in humans) (2). Proteasome gene expression is triggered by the nuclear respiratory factor 1 (Nrf1). This transcription factor is, in turn, regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) (3) and a feedback mechanism compensating proteasome dysfunction (4). Nrf1-dependent transcription of proteasomal genes is also increased by pharmacological inhibition of proteasomes (2). Pharmacological inhibition of proteasome function is important for the treatment of several diseases such as cancer (5), whereas stimulators of proteasome activity are being researched (6) as potential remedies against neurodegenerative diseases and as antiaging agents. It was shown that proteasome activity in long-living mammal species is higher than in short-living animals (7). Several natural substances were found to stimulate proteasome activity (8), synthetic molecules are also intensively studied (9).
In our opinion, testing of the impact of 1,4-dihydropyridine (1,4-DHP) derivatives, a vast group of compounds with different pharmacological activities, on the UPS could be a prospective research branch. A big group of these compounds has been synthesised in the Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis over the last few years. Some of them manifest interesting effects besides antioxidant activity (9), as they can modify cell proliferation (10), bind DNA and proteins, or stimulate DNA repair by activating DNA repair enzymes (11, 12). These novel 1,4‑DHP derivatives have a weak Ca2+ channel blocker activity and are water-soluble unlike “classical” Ca2+ channel blockers, which are hydrophobic. Yet they can modify the expression of several genes and proteins (13, 14), including the proteasome gene Psma6 (15). The present work aimed to expand our previous research by studying the effects of several 1,4‑DHP derivatives on mRNA expression levels of proteasomal genes Psma3, Psmb5, and Psmc6 in several organs of rats to see if they have pharmacological potential as UPS modulators.
This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Food and Veterinary Service (Riga, Latvia) and was carried out according to the guidelines of the 1986 European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (16). Male Wistar rats (215.0±5.6 g) were purchased from the Laboratory of Experimental Animals, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia. Animals were kept at 22±0.5 °C with a 12 h light/dark cycle and fed standard laboratory diet.
All drugs used in the study – metcarbatone, etcarbatone, glutapyrone, styrylcarbatone (J-9-125), and AV-153 Na and Ca salts (Figure 1) were synthesised at the Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis. Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie (Taufkirchen, Germany).

Formulas of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives used in the study
Rats were divided into control and treatment groups. The latter received 0.05 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg of metcarbatone, etcarbatone, glutapyrone, styrylcarbatone, AV-153-Na, or AV-153-Ca per os by gavage for three days. The rats were then euthanised and their organ samples (kidneys, blood, and liver) taken and frozen in liquid nitrogen until analysis. There were two sets of rats. Kidneys and blood were taken from the control group (11 animals) and groups treated with metcarbatone, etcarbatone, glutapyrone, and styrylcarbatone (3–4 animals per group). Kidneys and liver were taken from the control group (10 animals) and groups treated with AV-153-Na and AV-153-Ca (3–5 animals per group).
Total RNA was isolated from the kidneys, blood, and liver with a TRI reagent (Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). RNA was purified from DNA with a DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and its quantity and purity determined with a NanoPhotometer ® NP 80 spectrophotometer (ImplenGMBH, Munich, Germany).
The quality of RNA was analysed with gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesised from the obtained RNA (5 μg from kidneys and liver, and 2 μg from blood) with random hexamer primers (RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania).
mRNA expression of Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6, and a reference gene (RNA-polymerase II) in the kidney, blood, and liver was determined using the SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. For the AV-153-Na and AV-153-Ca treatment groups, we also determined the expression of the Psma6 gene.
Primers were designed using Primer‑BLAST software ( 1 7 ) . Primer sequences were: Psma3 – 5’‑CACCATCCTCTGGTGTCCATT‑3’ (forward) and 5’‑CGCAGATATCCTCAATTACCCAAC‑3’ (reverse) ( fragment size 1 2 8 b p ) ; P s m b 5 – 5’‑AGGTGCCTACATTGCTTCCC‑3’ (forward) and 5’‑GAGATGCGTTCCTTGTTGCG‑3’ (reverse) (fragment size 159 bp); Psmc6 – 5’‑TACATTGGGGAAAGCGCTCG‑3’ (forward) and 5’‑TCAGAAAACCGACGACCACC‑3’ (reverse) (fragment size 116 bp); and Psma6 – 5’‑GTGTGCGCTACGGGGTGTA‑3’ (forward) and 5’‑AGTCACGGTGCTGGAATCCA‑3’ (reverse) (fragment size 247 bp). The choice of the reference RNA‑polymerase II gene was described earlier (18). Primer sequences for this gene were 5’‑GCCAGAGTCTCCCATGTGTT‑3’ (forward) and 5’‑GTCGGTGGGACTCTGTTTGT‑3’ (reverse) (amplified fragment size 135 bp).
Oligonucleotides were supplied by Metabion International AG (Martinsried, Germany). qPCR reactions were performed using a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycling conditions were as follows: one cycle at 95 ºC for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95 ºC for 15 sec, and one cycle at 60 ºC for 1 min (Applied Biosystems StepOne software, version 2.1). The specificity of amplification products was verified by dissociation curve: one cycle at 95 ºC for 15 sec, one at 60 ºC for 1 min, and one at 95 ºC for 15 sec. The cycle threshold (Ct) values are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
Kidney and blood real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values
| Kidneys | Blood | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNSpolII | Psma3 | Psmb5 | Psmc6 | RNSpolII | Psma3 | Psmb5 | Psmc6 | |
| Control | 20,6336 | 21,2849 | 20,2966 | 18,5916 | 19,3183 | 24,7317 | 23,9346 | 23,4343 |
| 19,9632 | 21,0402 | 20,1468 | 18,5301 | 19,1140 | 24,9544 | 23,9330 | 23,6485 | |
| 20,5162 | 20,6843 | 19,9793 | 18,4140 | 19,5568 | 23,5918 | 23,6477 | 22,6171 | |
| 19,7661 | 20,8542 | 20,0899 | 18,4168 | 19,5473 | 25,3724 | 23,5371 | 23,2719 | |
| 20,4493 | 21,1992 | 20,3281 | 18,7329 | 19,2752 | 24,2432 | 23,6730 | 22,2758 | |
| 20,0575 | 20,7519 | 19,8123 | 18,2283 | 18,0247 | 24,1311 | 23,7417 | 21,8996 | |
| 19,8994 | 20,8551 | 20,1670 | 18,5733 | 19,6721 | 24,1230 | 22,6278 | 22,9333 | |
| 19,9792 | 21,2709 | 20,5719 | 18,8297 | 18,5737 | 23,8446 | 23,0603 | 22,4729 | |
| 20,3273 | 21,4559 | 20,4872 | 18,9060 | 18,9473 | 24,8475 | 24,5772 | 23,0626 | |
| 20,7163 | 21,1733 | 20,4132 | 18,8730 | 19,7215 | 24,5549 | 23,4031 | 23,6338 | |
| 20,1879 | 21,1945 | 20,4594 | 18,7461 | 18,7025 | 24,7850 | 24,1693 | ||
| 18,7703 | 24,3940 | 24,0506 | ||||||
| Metcarbatone 0.05 mg/kg | 21,1421 | 21,1700 | 20,2690 | 18,7102 | 19,1992 | 24,9793 | 24,9819 | 23,4209 |
| 20,6063 | 20,9449 | 20,0149 | 18,6103 | 18,2122 | 25,0053 | 24,6967 | 22,8411 | |
| 20,9352 | 21,4263 | 20,5656 | 18,9078 | 19,6951 | 24,3028 | 23,8090 | 22,9598 | |
| 20,5415 | 20,9494 | 20,0938 | 18,4946 | 18,7135 | 24,5634 | 24,1763 | 22,6806 | |
| Metcarbatone 0.5 mg/kg | 20,8324 | 20,9915 | 20,1140 | 18,8390 | 18,9062 | 25,2567 | 23,8337 | 23,6736 |
| 21,1187 | 21,0831 | 20,1682 | 18,7917 | 19,2715 | 25,2724 | 24,5450 | 23,6550 | |
| 21,0912 | 21,1248 | 20,3896 | 18,8515 | 18,5728 | 24,6956 | 23,9355 | 22,8742 | |
| 20,6640 | 21,1151 | 20,0875 | 18,7441 | 18,6701 | 25,2925 | 24,5882 | 23,2121 | |
| Etcarbatone 0.05 mg/kg | 20,6521 | 21,3114 | 20,2236 | 18,6247 | 18,8542 | 24,8812 | 24,1604 | 22,9606 |
| 21,2283 | 21,3560 | 20,3069 | 18,6993 | 19,1319 | 24,8758 | 24,7965 | 22,9433 | |
| 21,3387 | 21,4437 | 20,1647 | 18,7293 | 18,1798 | 24,6700 | 24,4486 | 22,5183 | |
| Etcarbatone 0.5 mg/kg | 20,6957 | 21,2241 | 20,1316 | 18,4727 | 19,2888 | 24,9479 | 24,4943 | 23,1595 |
| 21,4283 | 21,6113 | 20,5876 | 18,8926 | 19,2577 | 24,8016 | 24,0260 | 23,0911 | |
| 21,0995 | 21,5415 | 20,3180 | 18,8051 | 18,9519 | 24,5479 | 24,2079 | 22,4058 | |
| 20,9716 | 21,4134 | 20,4994 | 18,8108 | 19,0836 | 24,6532 | 24,6596 | 22,5140 | |
| Styrylcarbatone 0.05 mg/kg | 21,4476 | 21,4452 | 20,5627 | 18,6984 | 19,5796 | 23,9558 | 23,0535 | 22,6217 |
| 20,9010 | 21,0415 | 20,1628 | 18,3986 | 19,0160 | 24,8889 | 24,1739 | 23,2842 | |
| 21,3434 | 21,2509 | 20,2865 | 18,6662 | 18,1215 | 23,5157 | 23,3238 | 21,4245 | |
| 21,6191 | 22,0462 | 21,5846 | 18,9777 | 19,5722 | 25,4267 | 24,9225 | 23,4448 | |
| Styrylcarbatone 0.5 mg/kg | 21,5660 | 21,5113 | 21,2236 | 18,9375 | 19,1745 | 23,8688 | 23,2048 | 22,2596 |
| 21,2131 | 21,5601 | 20,7720 | 18,7713 | 19,5076 | 24,7026 | 23,6100 | 23,0168 | |
| 21,0897 | 21,4685 | 20,4881 | 18,7617 | 18,9420 | 24,6156 | 23,8653 | 23,2664 | |
| 21,4455 | 21,6779 | 20,9215 | 18,9282 | |||||
| Glutapyrone 0.05 mg/kg | 22,0678 | 22,8544 | 21,6248 | 19,8827 | 18,9078 | 23,7505 | 22,4539 | 22,0790 |
| 21,0281 | 22,1696 | 20,8820 | 19,3440 | 19,1537 | 23,5877 | 22,7654 | 22,3149 | |
| 21,1787 | 21,9149 | 20,8096 | 19,0287 | 20,1436 | 25,5499 | 23,8626 | 23,8251 | |
| 21,3287 | 21,5062 | 20,4549 | 18,7512 | 19,6614 | 24,1258 | 23,0498 | 23,1506 | |
| Glutapyrone 0.5 mg/kg | 21,0105 | 21,8076 | 20,5749 | 18,8806 | 19,3639 | 24,6586 | 23,1130 | 22,9958 |
| 20,6910 | 21,6908 | 20,2656 | 18,6775 | 19,6876 | 25,6195 | 23,7417 | 24,0393 | |
| 21,1142 | 21,4909 | 20,2270 | 18,7062 | 19,4588 | 24,3839 | 23,1421 | 22,8727 | |
| 21,3715 | 21,4707 | 20,0467 | 18,8292 | 19,4118 | 24,7691 | 23,3703 | 23,2199 | |
Liver real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values
| Kidneys | Liver | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNSpolII | Psma3 | Psmb5 | Psmc6 | Psma6 | RNSpolII | Psma3 | Psmb5 | Psmc6 | Psma6 | |
| Control | 20,5970 | 22,5839 | 19,2551 | 19,1623 | 19,9986 | 19,8560 | 23,0557 | 21,1670 | 18,6385 | 19,8489 |
| 20,4384 | 22,5746 | 19,0794 | 18,8645 | 19,5620 | 19,5794 | 22,9181 | 21,1984 | 18,6208 | 19,6455 | |
| 20,4358 | 22,5837 | 19,1140 | 18,8865 | 19,7310 | 19,9334 | 23,3011 | 21,1796 | 19,6168 | 20,4226 | |
| 20,5461 | 22,7381 | 19,0685 | 19,1585 | 19,7124 | 19,7203 | 23,1264 | 21,1636 | 19,4941 | 20,2836 | |
| 20,3772 | 22,3517 | 19,0689 | 19,2026 | 20,2427 | 19,1888 | 22,9224 | 21,0717 | 19,1761 | 19,8373 | |
| 20,3640 | 22,2591 | 18,9613 | 18,9177 | 19,7695 | 19,7114 | 23,1850 | 21,1812 | 19,1708 | 20,0905 | |
| 20,4210 | 22,1444 | 19,0667 | 18,8171 | 19,3981 | 19,8140 | 23,5071 | 21,3909 | 19,3937 | 20,2497 | |
| 20,5429 | 22,3808 | 19,2618 | 20,5558 | 19,7631 | 23,3798 | 21,3486 | 19,0927 | 20,2443 | ||
| 20,4095 | 22,3303 | 18,9823 | 20,3727 | 19,6435 | 23,5475 | 21,2771 | 19,3322 | 20,4155 | ||
| 19,9648 | 22,0525 | 18,7116 | 19,2846 | |||||||
| AV-153-Na 0.05 mg/kg | 21,1756 | 22,9314 | 19,3199 | 19,5803 | 20,0066 | 19,3193 | 22,6985 | 21,0440 | 18,3758 | 18,9400 |
| 22,0513 | 23,4752 | 19,6423 | 19,9317 | 20,6172 | 18,8415 | 22,8245 | 20,9705 | 18,3795 | 19,0355 | |
| 21,4856 | 23,2240 | 19,4647 | 19,6623 | 19,8643 | 19,5196 | 22,7070 | 21,0585 | 18,3857 | 19,0187 | |
| 21,6234 | 23,2381 | 19,5993 | 19,5928 | 19,6469 | 18,8631 | 22,7883 | 20,9608 | 18,3031 | 18,9503 | |
| AV-153-Na 0.5 mg/kg | 21,9367 | 23,2775 | 19,4898 | 19,8077 | 20,0014 | 19,6059 | 22,7776 | 20,9764 | 18,4171 | 19,0567 |
| 21,6564 | 23,2385 | 19,5634 | 19,4900 | 19,8338 | 19,6035 | 22,8215 | 21,0093 | 18,4078 | 19,0701 | |
| 21,2077 | 23,2004 | 19,4074 | 19,5859 | 19,9741 | 19,5527 | 22,8589 | 20,9877 | 18,3254 | 19,1177 | |
| AV-153-Ca 0.05 mg/kg | 19,7019 | 22,0370 | 19,1800 | 18,7166 | 19,3175 | 19,3393 | 22,9415 | 20,8086 | 19,1408 | 19,8715 |
| 19,8564 | 22,2813 | 19,3695 | 18,7706 | 19,2143 | 19,6280 | 23,3113 | 21,0154 | 19,1477 | 20,3142 | |
| 20,1111 | 21,8349 | 19,0583 | 18,6593 | 19,3757 | 19,3697 | 22,8512 | 20,9235 | 18,9642 | 20,2187 | |
| 19,6506 | 23,1935 | 21,0658 | 19,3068 | 20,0824 | ||||||
| AV-153-Ca 0.5 mg/kg | 20,3086 | 22,0432 | 19,5138 | 18,8374 | 19,3591 | 19,4528 | 22,9892 | 20,7577 | 19,0212 | 19,3202 |
| 20,5201 | 22,7760 | 18,8733 | 19,2125 | 20,2666 | 19,5880 | 23,2170 | 21,2606 | 19,0527 | 19,6300 | |
| 19,5801 | 21,8729 | 18,8382 | 18,7051 | 19,3437 | 18,8662 | 23,0295 | 21,3512 | 18,8270 | 19,3601 | |
| 20,1326 | 22,0602 | 18,9902 | 18,8147 | 19,6876 | 19,5368 | 23,2560 | 21,5740 | 19,0952 | 19,4394 | |
| 20,1226 | 21,8402 | 18,8235 | 18,8101 | 19,4492 | 19,5666 | 23,0126 | 21,1141 | 18,7163 | 19,2355 | |
Reference gene stability was analysed with BestKeeper provided in RefFinder (https://www.heartcure.com). Among studied organs, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 0.22 to 0.54, and the coefficient of variance (CV) ranged from 1.13 to 2.63. These values are consistent with those reported for stable housekeeping genes (19). Gene expression data were expressed using the 2-ΔΔCt method – mean fold difference with standard error of the mean (SEM) (20). The P values were calculated from delta values using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons between the groups. In all tests, the P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were run on the GraphPad Prism 6 version 6.01 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
In the kidney, metcarbatone at both doses significantly increased the expression of the Psma3, Psmb5, and Psmc6 genes (Table 3). The higher dose produced a more pronounced effect for Psma3 and Psmb5. The increase ranged from 1.43-fold with Psmc6 (0.05 mg/kg: P=0.010; 0.5 mg/kg: P=0.015) to 1.69-fold with Psmb5 (0.5 mg/kg: P=0.001). In the blood, metcarbatone significantly decreased the Psmc6 gene expression by 0.60 (0.5 mg/kg: P=0.032).
The effect of metcarbatone on Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6 gene expression in the kidney and blood
| Metcarbatone (mg/kg) | Kidney fold difference (SEM range) | Blood fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.07) | 1.00 (0.87–1.14) |
| 0.05 | 1.44 (1.34–1.54)* | 0.76 (0.56–1.04) | |
| 0.50 | 1.61 (1.50–1.74)** | 0.53 (0.48–0.58) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.08) | 1.00 (0.84–1.18) |
| 0.05 | 1.51 (1.40–1.63)** | 0.55 (0.39–0.77) | |
| 0.50 | 1.69 (1.60–1.79)** | 0.58 (0.51–0.67) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 1.00 (0.90–1.12) |
| 0.05 | 1.43 (1.34–1.54)* | 0.83 (0.68–1.01) | |
| 0.50 | 1.43 (1.34–1.53)* | 0.60 (0.55–0.64)* |
*P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared to control
The Psma3, Psmb5, and Psmc6 gene expression significantly increased in the kidney (Table 4), from 1.36-fold at the higher dose for Psma3 (P=0.046) to 1.82-fold at the lower dose for Psmb5 (P=0.002). No significant differences were detected in the blood.
The effect of etcarbatone on Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6 gene expression in the kidney and blood
| Etcarbatone (mg/kg) | Kidney fold difference (SEM range) | Blood fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.07) | 1.00 (0.87–1.14) |
| 0.05 | 1.46 (1.29–1.65)* | 0.61 (0.52–0.70) | |
| 0.50 | 1.36 (1.29–1.43)* | 0.85 (0.84–0.87) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.08) | 1.00 (0.84–1.18) |
| 0.05 | 1.82 (1.56–2.12)** | 0.45 (0.37–0.55) | |
| 0.50 | 1.61 (1.52–1.71)** | 0.66 (0.59–0.74) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 1.00 (0.90–1.12) |
| 0.05 | 1.72 (1.52–1.95)** | 0.79 (0.71–0.88) | |
| 0.50 | 1.62 (1.53–1.72)** | 1.07 (0.99–1.17) |
*P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared to control
Styrylcarbatone significantly increased the expression of the Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6 genes (Table 5). It was the most pronounced for Psmc6 – up to 2.05-fold at the lower dose (P<0.0001). No significant differences were detected in the blood.
The effect of styrylcarbatone on Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6 gene expression in the kidney and blood
| Styrylcarbatone (mg/kg) | Kidney fold difference (SEM range) | Blood fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.07) | 1.00 (0.87–1.14) |
| 0.05 | 1.65 (1.53–1.79)** | 0.99 (0.78–1.26) | |
| 0.50 | 1.53 (1.43–1.64)** | 1.13 (0.93–1.37) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.08) | 1.00 (0.84–1.18) |
| 0.05 | 1.63 (1.39–1.90)** | 0.87 (0.64–1.18) | |
| 0.50 | 1.41 (1.36–1.47)* | 1.18 (0.97–1.44) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 1.00 (0.90–1.12) |
| 0.05 | 2.05 (1.98–2.13)*** | 1.09 (0.90–1.32) | |
| 0.50 | 1.83 (1.75–1.91)*** | 1.08 (0.84–1.39) |
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.0001 compared to control
In the kidney, the higher dose of glutapyrone significantly increased Psmb5 expression 1.73-fold (P=0.003; Table 6) and Psmc6 expression up to 1.59-fold (P=0.004). In the blood, the lower dose of glutapyrone increased Psmb5 expression 2.04-fold (P=0.036).
The effect of glutapyrone on Psma3, Psmb5 and Psmc6 gene expression in the kidney and blood
| Glutapyrone (mg/kg) | Kidney fold difference (SEM range) | Blood fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.07) | 1.00 (0.87–1.14) |
| 0.05 | 1.10 (0.95–1.26) | 1.49 (1.27–1.74) | |
| 0.50 | 1.21 (1.05–1.39) | 0.99 (0.86–1.14) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.93–1.08) | 1.00 (0.84–1.18) |
| 0.05 | 1.40 (1.26–1.55) | 2.04 (1.94–2.14)* | |
| 0.50 | 1.73 (1.49–2.01)** | 1.66 (1.56–1.77) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 1.00 (0.90–1.12) |
| 0.05 | 1.46 (1.28–1.66)* | 1.30 (1.19–1.42) | |
| 0.50 | 1.59 (1.46–1.73)** | 0.96 (0.84–1.11) |
*P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared to control
AV-153-Na significantly increased the expression of Psma3, Psmb5, Psmc6, and Psma6 at both doses (Table 7) in the kidney. The higher dose resulted in the highest (2.17-fold) increase in Psma6 (P=0.0007), while the lower dose increased it 1.91-fold (P=0.0002). Psmc6 gene expression increased 1.61-fold at the higher dose (P=0.017), but the lower dose decreased the Psmb5 gene expression by 0.79 (P=0.029).
The effect of AV-153-Na on Psma3, Psmb5, Psmc6 and Psma6 gene expression in the kidney and liver
| AV-153-Na (mg/kg) | Kidneys fold difference (SEM range) | Liver fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 1.00 (0.95–1.05) |
| 0.05 | 1.28 (1.21–1.35)* | 0.94 (0.82–1.08) | |
| 0.50 | 1.28 (1.12–1.46)* | 1.23 (1.19–1.26) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) | 1.00 (0.94–1.04) |
| 0.05 | 1.64 (1.51–1.78)*** | 0.79 (0.71–0.87)* | |
| 0.50 | 1.68 (1.47–1.91)*** | 1.09 (1.08–1.11) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 1.00 (0.92–1.09) |
| 0.05 | 1.39 (1.29–1.51)** | 1.19 (1.07–1.33) | |
| 0.50 | 1.47 (1.30–1.66)** | 1.61 (1.59–1.62)* | |
| Psma6 | Control | 1.00 (0.92–1.08) | 1.00 (0.94–1.06) |
| 0.05 | 2.00 (1.78–2.25)*** | 1.49 (1.32–1.68)** | |
| 0.50 | 2.17 (1.87–2.52)*** | 1.91 (1.86–1.95)*** |
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared to control
In the kidney, AV-153-Ca significantly affected only the Psmb5 gene expression, which decreased by 0.62 at the lower dose (P=0.0043; Table 8). In the blood, Psma6 gene expression increased 1.35-fold at the lower dose. Other tested genes were not affected significantly.
The effect of AV-153-Ca on Psma3, Psmb5, Psmc6 and Psma6 gene expression in the kidney and liver
| AV-153-Ca (mg/kg) | Kidney fold difference (SEM range) | Liver fold difference (SEM range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psma3 | Control | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 1.00 (0.95–1.05) |
| 0.05 | 0.89 (0.76–1.03) | 0.96 (0.94–0.99) | |
| 0.50 | 1.00 (0.92–1.09) | 0.89 (0.81–0.97) | |
| Psmb5 | Control | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) | 1.00 (0.94–1.04) |
| 0.05 | 0.62 (0.55–0.71)** | 1.05 (1.03–1.08) | |
| 0.50 | 0.85 (0.75–0.95) | 0.82 (0.71–0.95) | |
| Psmc6 | Control | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 1.00 (0.92–1.09) |
| 0.05 | 0.85 (0.77–0.93) | 0.89 (0.86–0.93) | |
| 0.50 | 0.90 (0.84–0.96) | 0.96 (0.88–1.05) | |
| Psma6 | Control | 1.00 (0.92–1.08) | 1.00 (0.94–1.06) |
| 0.05 | 1.03 (0.96–1.11) | 0.87 (0.82–0.93) | |
| 0.50 | 0.98 (0.89–1.07) | 1.35 (1.22–1.48)* |
*P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared to control
Most of the tested 1,4-DHP derivatives increased gene expression levels in the kidney but were mainly without a significant effect in the blood and liver. The general sensitivity of the kidney cells to 1,4‑DHP could simply be explained by accumulation of the compounds in the kidney before excretion, but there are no data to support it.
Comparing the effects of 1,4‑DHP derivatives on different proteasome subunit genes, we noticed that subunit mRNA expression did not follow a uniform pattern. Other authors have also reported divergent effects of drugs on different proteasome subunit gene expression. For example, cocaine mainly upregulated the PSMB1 and PSMA5 subunits and downregulated the PSMA6 subunit but did not affect the PSMB2 and PSMB5 subunits (21).
In the kidney, metcarbatone, etcarbatone, styrylcarbatone, and AV-153-Na increased the expression of all analysed genes, but glutapyrone and AV-153-Ca showed varying effects. Glutapyrone did not affect the expression of Psma3, which codes for the outer ring subunit of the 20S proteasome, but did increase the expression of Psmc6, which encodes for the subunit of the 19S regulatory complex. At the higher dose glutapyrone also increased the expression of Psmb5, which codes for the inner ring subunit of the 20S proteasome. Interestingly, while AV-153-Na increased Psmb5 expression in the kidney, AV-153-Ca decreased it. Furthermore, AV-153-Ca was the only compound that decreased the expression of any of the tested genes in the kidney.
In the blood, glutapyrone increased only Psmb5 expression. An earlier study (15) reported that glutapyrone increased the mRNA expression of Psma6, another subunit of the outer ring of the 20S proteasome, both in the kidney and blood. Metcarbatone at the higher dose decreased Psmc6 expression in blood.
In the liver, AV-153-Na upregulated the expression of Psma6 and also of Psmc6 at the higher dose but downregulated Psmb5 at the lower dose. The higher dose of AV-153-Ca increased only Psma6 expression.
1,4‑DHP derivatives as prospective drugs have already shown antioxidant activities and a wide range of antiaging, antibacterial, anticancer, and neuroprotective actions (10). Glutapyrone, a representative of the novel group of 1,4‑DHP derivatives with weak Ca2+ channel blocker activity has very low toxicity and multiple pharmacological properties, including concomitant effects on multiple neurotransmitter systems and antioxidant activities (22). Carbatone, another compound of this group, administered orally, showed fast absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and 62 % bioavailability. It quickly spreads across tissues and is excreted mostly through urine and faeces. This group of 1,4-DHP derivatives seems to have a very low cytotoxicity at the tested doses (unpublished data).
It also seems that the protective antioxidant activities of 1,4-DHP derivatives are achieved by targeting the mitochondria. They might be working through direct scavenging of reactive oxygen species and decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Furthermore, they stimulate cell growth and differentiation (23). An in vitro study in human osteoblast-like cells treated with 1,4-DHP derivatives (23) demonstrated de novo glutathione synthesis, indicating the involvement of the NRF2 signalling pathway in the action of these compounds. It also suggested that the bioactivity of 1,4-DHP derivatives is associated with 4-hydroxynonenal and related second messengers of free radicals, but precise bioactivity mechanisms remain to be elucidated. The increase in proteasomal gene expression by 1,4-DHP derivatives may have similar beneficial mechanisms as those reported for antioxidants, which elevate transcription levels of 26S proteasome subunits responsible for removal of damaged proteins and attenuating the progression of human diseases related to oxidative stress (24).
The downregulation of UPS genes in the liver seems to correspond with age. In old mice, this downregulation was reported to lead to the accumulation of IκBα in the cytoplasm, which prevented the activation of the NF-κB protein, which is important for hepatocyte survival and liver health (25). Older age also seems to be associated with lower mRNA levels of both proteasome beta subunits, which are directly involved in the proteolytic function of the proteasome and antioxidant activity (26), but some healthy centenarians were reported to have proteasome subunit mRNA levels close to young donors. Furthermore, one study showed that a stable transfection of either PSMB1 or PSMB5 enhanced proteasome function and resistance to oxidative stress (27). This is why our findings of increased proteasome subunit gene expression by 1,4‑DHP derivatives seem promising in terms of pharmacotherapy.
Downregulated proteasomal gene expression is also associated with several pathologies. For instance, in patients with schizophrenia, dentate granule neurons showed decreased expression of several proteasome subunit and other genes involved in protein processing by proteasomes and ubiquitin, resulting in a deficient ubiquitin-proteasome function that can lead to reduced neuron responsiveness (28). In patients with Parkinson’s disease, both catalytic and regulatory subunits of the UPS, including the PSMA3 gene analysed in this study, showed decreased gene expression in substantia nigra (29). This might lead to decreased levels of the 26S proteasome complex, insufficient degradation of short-lived proteins such as cyclins, and accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, which can eventually result in dopaminergic neuronal damage. In this kind of pathologies, the potential of 1,4-DHP derivatives to increase proteasomal gene expression might lead to restored proteasome function and therapeutic effect. However, additional research is needed to determine whether 1,4‑DHP derivatives increase proteasomal protein expression in the same way as they increase gene expression.
To sum up, our research has confirmed the ability of several 1,4-DHP derivatives to increase the expression of proteasome subunit genes. This might be a promising property for the development of drugs for conditions associated with impaired proteasomal functions and low mRNA levels of proteasome subunits.