Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results Cover

Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, United Nations. World Drug Report 2017. Vienna: Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs; 2017.
  2. Kilibarda B, Simić D, Baroš S, Brandić I. National Report on Drug Situation in Serbia, 2014 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/ 805/National_Report_Serbia_2014_EN_483880.pdf
  3. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Serbia National Drug Report, 2017 [displayed 3 January 2018]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/4701/National%20drug%20report_Serbia.pdf_en
  4. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia, Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanović-Batut”, European School Project on Alcohol and other Drugs. European Survey on the use of Alcohol and Other Drugs among young people in Serbia, 2008 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.batut.org.rs/download/publikacije/ESPAD%20eng%202008.pdf
  5. Standridge JB, Adams SM, Zotos AP. Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:635–40. PMID: 20187600
  6. Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Trescot AM, Giordano J. Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: tools, techniques, and utility. Pain Physician 2008;11(Suppl 2):S155–80. PMID: 18443638
  7. Schulberg M, Gerostamoulos D. Urinary drug screening. Aust Prescr 2013;36:62–4. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2013.051
  8. Tominaga M, Michiue T, Maeda H. Evaluation of the on-site immunoassay drug-screening device Triage-TOX in routine forensic autopsy. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2015;17:499–502. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.10.007
  9. Moriya F. Urine levels of drugs for which Triage DOA screening was positive. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2009;11(Suppl 1):S434–6. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.090
  10. Gomolka E. Immunoassay in toxicology diagnosis. In: Abuelzein E, editor. Trends in immunolabelled and related techniques. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p. 67–82.
  11. Jaffee WB, Trucco E, Levy S, Weiss RD. Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007;33:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.11.008
  12. Zimbardi G. Workplace substance use, the risk of occupational injury, and testing [dissertation]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2005.
  13. Riahi-Zanjani B. False positive and false negative results in urine drug screening tests: tampering methods and specimen integrity tests. PhOL 2014;1:102–8.
  14. Moeller KE, Lee KC, Kissack JC. Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:66–76. doi: 10.4065/83.1.66
  15. Schütz H, Erdmann F, Verhoff MA, Weiler G. Pitfalls of toxicological analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2003;5(Suppl 1):S6– 19. doi: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00084-6
  16. Cone EJ, Lange R, Darwin WD. In vivo adulteration: excess fluid ingestion causes false-negative marijuana and cocaine urine test tesults. J Anal Toxicol 1998;22:460–73. doi: 10.1093/ jat/22.6.460
  17. Conel EJ, Caplan YH, Moser F, Robert T, Shelby MK, Black DL. Normalization of urinary drug concentrations with specific gravity and creatinine. J Anal Toxicol 2009;33:1–7. doi: 10.1093/jat/33.1.1
  18. Dasgupta A. The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;128:491–503. doi: 10.1309/FQY06F8XKTQPM149
  19. USA Federal Register. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs using urine specimens, Subpart H - Urine Specimen Collection Procedure. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 94, 2015.
  20. Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at https://www.alims.gov.rs/eng/medical-devices/
  21. Rahdert E, Czechowicz D. Adolescent Drug abuse: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. NIDA Research Monograph 156. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research; 1995.
  22. Washio Y, Fairfax-Columbo J, Ball E, Cassey H, Arria A, Bresani E. A review of guidelines on home drug testing websites for parents. J Addict Med 2014;8:258–63. doi: 10.1097/ ADM.0000000000000042
  23. Roškar R, Sollner Dolenc M. Determination of benzodiazepines in urine via benzophenone derivatives using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2010;61:381–8. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-2058
  24. Schwarzhoff R, Cody J. The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse. J Anal Toxicol 1993;17:14–7. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.1.14
  25. Cody J, Schwarzhoff R. Impact on adulterants on RIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse. J Anal Toxicol 1989;13:277–84. doi: 10.1093/jat/13.5.277
  26. Mikkelsen S, Ash O. Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing. Clin Chem 1988;34:2333–6. PMID: 3052928
  27. Warner A. Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse. Clin Chem 1989;35:648–51. PMID: 2539273
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3315 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian, Slovenian
Page range: 87 - 93
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2019
|
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2020
|
Published on: Apr 9, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Ivana Rajšić, Dragana Javorac, Simona Tatović, Aleksandra Repić, Danijela Đukić-Ćosić, Snežana Đorđević, Vera Lukić, Zorica Bulat, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.