Figure 1.
![Six-Domain Challenges in Decentralized TB Diagnostic ImplementationNote: The implementation of decentralized tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic testing is hindered by interconnected challenges spanning six critical domains (A–F): A. Quality Assurance: Requires regular proficiency testing, external quality assurance, and instrument/equipment calibration to ensure diagnostic accuracy [13,25,35]; B. Human Resources: Includes shortages of trained personnel, limited career development opportunities, and difficulties in retaining staff [14,24]; C. Infrastructure and Logistics: Encompasses inadequate infrastructure, sample transportation difficulties, and operational logistics challenges [1,7]; D. Financial Sustainability: Entails high initial setup costs, gaps in ongoing operational funding, and long-term sustainability concerns [19,23]; E. Community Engagement: Involves trust-building barriers, insufficient community advocacy, and concerns regarding test accuracy [16,18]; F. Socio-Cultural Barriers: Encompasses social stigma, low health literacy, and cultural misconceptions that limit service uptake [18,24,29]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/679e8276082aa65dea3df950/j_ahem-2025-0017_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKDC5MZFG5%2F20260305%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260305T074139Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEPr%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJHMEUCIDDnH4KsEfyDTbOZ11I1tFp2dY1U6DDQl4TG%2FBBl%2FgECAiEA6R3z5xxK13haRkernfrXpxrMhWYcr0L3XJqizO3v7hwqxAUIw%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FARACGgw5NjMxMzQyODk5NDAiDDwqFRJ8J8ot%2F9cG4iqYBbEUbuvKMa1Z32gzAcwFYe2aHRCCFlgGOqO6k9mgc9WHVl0KwSFxdCUPNmWmfH6bSMAqsfQ3SFm7%2BSf6WKFVWfZNiWnnn0CFmtceS52JDhbo%2FhueNK3HFOmYo%2FlnBwhf0Cjz8%2FoNMYkut2oHb1fYA4GWvoZcnAj3xmwiRDJP5f688NjXikqx%2B70DFPYHHIDSFNSAPh3OdriE%2BZUWQaQEZkNdgCT1gNDV%2B7oNYfRgYH2wwWL02OyCng9DmwRCwxWuALFsFaxZTEOJ2PeU8aIafgn4vW3H4wsrAhDvs%2BI3OvwY9VBLJYvwZcdkHO8%2FI8Cpcfy3JqAyoMuHiycAirpWyn3jX9rLZG4xXgkpFwjSM2BjbHaHMYsFFsSwwuLecti5v%2FZxfO2OR6ao2EZwUFr8fbMibJADhL4XrBj9%2F%2FA0eJusXdJODkqQMYGiFo7%2FUQ8CLhKuifmGmQkHnUCBMVFSRldVv%2FOvbOtR1SIHAORV31xqzJUIybs%2F82T98MluqCyRQ6x%2FQd51CGElo2NZt%2BKdQe%2FrUR6BhzgygS1hmdA3VabSDNtl%2BQMyBeKWIRGWyB6WmU5zUzRJFq0OFwdE0hAST%2B0HxFc8JKPM7ahVvEBGH7RGeHaXx6coYqZG3ZR8oX3f0k9iOcytEiCCfpDJqh3m5eCZiUx0JPw7r0McwGXigQjgbvLEoRIp%2FMb2ouHs0ESBR1dVS%2FN%2FQWGiREKT6MzMImijYvscgxpqnkMs%2FpfMfC%2Blq30kBCNQy3wYMAShrBALEL5MN%2BSSGGjZYJM21XcCh9dBx3z0777XaIaqxS24XvC%2FyuFoF2KCiAygb12tvCsWvPAVPX1bYpYzMK3ECCjHVhLpfMXTA5KEL2aNQeHYCt1daLbVqOXIfiMwo9CjzQY6sQENjKCa%2BpMhVYVkY54hPG8iLmTuVZa%2BHegY%2FMgYCt33fJXPTNB6Un0F0PCsFg4Q2Q708T39G%2BBl5%2BlNRIzicbISQuo58FhoTBzCq7ZRL%2FevZ2l8JWzTJMLkV14jCTCwE5nFBjR%2FHU2FxN6C8M7TSzwFC7R9opFMFL0aMj7ag9xUcHwld7cy3VteWmrkkTxJ%2BVNmiazTAnXs7HKX0puoBmVY%2BApF8hd7jQIthKwOO%2Bk9IAM%3D&X-Amz-Signature=9f319fcf4df9ca59310f6534d225dc0da0d6f94bc9ea9f0cc320d689aad07f4d&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2.

Policy and Action Matrix for Decentralized TB Diagnostic Implementation
| Future Direction | Policy Focus | Implementation Level |
|---|---|---|
| Institutionalization in NTPs | Health Policy | National |
| Regulatory & Quality Frameworks | Regulation & Standards | National |
| Sustainable Financing | Health Economics | National/International |
| Capacity Building for Workforce | Human Resources | Regional/National |
| Integration of Digital & AI Tools | Digital Health | National/Facility |
| Community-Centered Models | Public Engagement | Local/Community |
| Global Collaboration | Global Health | Regional/Global |
| Evidence quality and research | Promote high-quality RCTs, prospective studies | National/International |
| Patient-centered design | Incorporate patient feedback and satisfaction measures | Local/Community |
| Regional adaptation | Tailor strategies to local context | National/Regional |
Comparative Features of Centralized vs_ Decentralized Tuberculosis (TB) Diagnostic Models
| Dimension | Centralized Testing | Decentralized Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Test Location | National or regional central laboratories | Primary care settings or point-of-care (POC) sites |
| Turnaround Time | Days to weeks | Minutes to hours |
| Infrastructure | High-complexity set-up with biosafety and cold chain | Low-resource adaptable, portable platforms |
| Sample Logistics | Requires long-distance transport, cold chain | On-site testing, minimal logistics |
| Human Resources | Requires highly-trained laboratory specialists | Operable by general health workers with minimal training |
| Diagnostic Access | Limited in rural and remote areas | High accessibility across decentralized regions |
| Operational Cost | High fixed and variable costs | Lower marginal cost after implementation |
| Scalability | Limited by central lab capacity | Highly scalable across diverse health system levels |
| Patient Perspective | Indirect; limited engagement | Higher satisfaction, reduced travel costs, better adherence |
| Socio-cultural adaptability | Low (standardized protocols, limited cultural tailoring) | High (adaptable to local context, community involvement) |