Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Methodic Approach to Assessment of the Types of Balanced Land Use of Rural Areas Cover

Methodic Approach to Assessment of the Types of Balanced Land Use of Rural Areas

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Abreu, I., Mesias, F. J., Ramajo, J. (2021). Design and validation of an index to measure development in rural areas through stakeholder participation (No. 2109.12568).
  2. Budziak, O.S. (2016). Formation of environmental land use on agricultural lands of Ukraine. Balanced use of natural resources, 3, 180-187.
  3. Budziak, O.S., Budziak, V.M. (2017). Problems of land use in conditions of reforming property relations. Problems of nature management in the process of property relations reforming: Kyiv, Ukraine.
  4. Druhak, V. M. Kuryltsiv, R. M., Tretiak, N. A. (2012). New paradigm of management of land resources and land use in Ukraine. Land law of Ukraine, 2, 14-21.
  5. Hensiruk, S. A. (1992). Rational use of natural resources. Svit: Lviv, Ukraine.
  6. Hutsuliak, H.D. (2010). Sustainable development of land use: methodological aspects of management. Prut: Chernivtsi, Ukraine.
  7. Hutsuliak, Yu. (2009). Optimization of natural environment: its criteria, problems and directions of their solution. Land management bulletin, 1, 34-39.
  8. Kapitalchuk, I. (2018). Optimization of land use structure in the Republic of Moldova on the basis of the method ofecological-economic balance of the territory. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 239-247.10.2478/pesd-2018-0019
  9. Khvesyk, M.A. et al. (2019). Financial and economic fundamentals of nature management regulation. State institution “Institute of Nature Management Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”: Kyiv, Ukraine.
  10. Kovalyshyn, O.F., Kryshenyk, N.I. (2018). Improvement of methodic approaches to formation of legal restrictions while using land plots in the system of state land cadaster. Scientific bulletin of UNFU of Ukraine, 28(4), 78-82.10.15421/40280414
  11. Kovalyshyn, O., Pendzei, L. (2020). Determination of the main directions of balanced land use by the analitic hierarchy process. Journal of Agri-Food Industry. 20(2), 83-90.
  12. Martyn, A.H. (2001). Economic aspects of optimization of the structure of land use with application of mathematical modeling methods. Institute of Land Organization of UAAS: Kyiv, Ukraine.
  13. Moilanen, A., Anderson, B.J., Eigenbrod, F., Heinemeyer, A., Roy, D.B., Gillings, S., Thomas C.D. (2011). Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecological Applications, 21(5), 1419–1426.10.1890/10-1865.121830691
  14. Nuzhna, O., Tluchkevych, N., Semenyshena, N., Nahirska, K., Sadovska, I. (2019). Making managerial decisions in the agrarian management through the use of ABC-Analysis tool. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 10(7), 798-816.10.14807/ijmp.v10i7.901
  15. Palianychko, N.I. (2012). Organizational constituent in supply of sustainable land use. In Economics of nature management and environmental protection, 163-169, Kyiv, Ukraine.
  16. Pérez-Soba, M., Petit, S., Jones, L., Bertrand, N., Briquel, V., Omodei-Zorini, L., ... & Groot, R. D. (2008). Land use functions – a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. In Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes, 375-404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-78648-1_19
  17. Ryborski, I., Gojko E. (1988). Impact of land uses on the sustainability area. Land management in special conditions. Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia.
  18. Shkuratov, O. (2018). Methodology for Estimation of Ecological Safety in the Agricultural of Ukraine. Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and rural development, 18(3), 379-389.
  19. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2001). The Law of Ukraine «Land Code of Ukraine». Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2768-14#Text (Accessed 1 June 2021).
  20. Tretiak, A.M. (2012). Ecology of land use: theoretical and methodological principles of formation and administration: monograph. Hrin D.S.: Kherson. Ukraine.
  21. Tretiak, A.M., Tretiak V.M., Hunko L.A., Lobunko Yu.V. (2016). Organization of land use of the structural elements of ecological network of Ukraine at the local level. S.E. Komprynh: Kyiv, Ukraine.
  22. Tretiak, A., Tretіak, R. Shkvir, M. (2001). Methodical recommendations for assessing the ecological stability of agricultural landscapes and agricultural land use. Kiev, Ukraine.
  23. Van der Vlist, M. J. (1998). Land use planning in the Netherlands; finding a balance between rural development and protection of the environment. Landscape and urban planning, 41(2), 135-144.10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00068-6
  24. Voronkova, O. Yu., Sycheva, I. N. (2017). Application of Environmental Criteria. In Economic-Mathematical Modeling for The Development of Organic Agricultural Production. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7(4), 151–156.10.15421/2017_99
  25. Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Cheong, K. C. (2019). Urban–rural construction land replacement for more sustainable land use and regional development in China: Policies and practices. Land, 8(11), 171.10.3390/land8110171
  26. Williams, D. R., Alvarado, F. G., Rhys E. M., Phalan, B., & Balmford, A. (2017). Land-use strategies to balance livestock production, biodiversity conservation and carbon storage in Yucatan, Mexico. Global Change Biology, 23(12), 5260–5272.10.1111/gcb.1379128614629
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2022-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2449-5999 | Journal ISSN: 2083-1587
Language: English
Page range: 215 - 229
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2022
|
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2022
|
Published on: Nov 15, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Oleksandra Kovalyshyn, Lubov Pendzey, Nataliia Tretiak, Olha Kulikovska, Plamen Kangalov, Taras Shchur, Sławomir Kocira, published by Polish Society of Agricultural Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.