Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Technological Processing of Dried Powdered Rosehips to Tablets Through Wet Granulation Cover

Technological Processing of Dried Powdered Rosehips to Tablets Through Wet Granulation

Open Access
|Sep 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Particle Size Distribution: LAC versus MCC Granules.
Particle Size Distribution: LAC versus MCC Granules.

Figure 2.

Tablets formulated from Rosehips powder differing in the type of filler: MCC tablet (A), LAC tablet (B).
Tablets formulated from Rosehips powder differing in the type of filler: MCC tablet (A), LAC tablet (B).

Figure 3.

Uniformity of Mass: LAC versus MCC Tablets.
Uniformity of Mass: LAC versus MCC Tablets.

Figure 4.

Electropherograms of L-ascorbic acid analysis in Microcrystalline Cellulose Tablets (MCC TBL).

A - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL
B - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL with 1 ppm addition of L-ascorbic acid
C - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL with 1.5 ppm addition of L-ascorbic acid
Electropherograms of L-ascorbic acid analysis in Microcrystalline Cellulose Tablets (MCC TBL). A - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL B - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL with 1 ppm addition of L-ascorbic acid C - 10 times diluted solution from MCC TBL with 1.5 ppm addition of L-ascorbic acid

The content of vitamin C in Lactose Tablets (LAC TBL) and Microcrystalline Cellulose Tablets (MCC TBL)_

LAC TBLMCC TBL
Content of vitamin C (µg)87.16 ± 5.0663.33 ± 2.83
% RSD5.804.47

The Quality Assessment of Lactose Tablets (LAC TBL) and Microcrystalline Cellulose Tablets (MCC TBL)_

LAC TBLMCC TBL
Mass (g)0.320 ± 0.0030.285 ± 0.003
Height (mm)4.37 ± 0.024.10 ± 0.02
Diameter (mm)9.09 ± 0.019.11 ± 0.01
Resistance to crushing (N)64.80 ± 7.4727.80 ± 2.15
Friability (%)0.14 ± 0.071.15 ± 0.26
Disintegration time (min)more than 1514.34 ± 0.50

The Composition of the Rosehip Granules: Lactose Granules (LAC GRA), Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC GRA)_

LAC GRA (g)MCC GRA (g)
Cynosbati fructus sine semine50.050.0
Lactosum monohydricum50.0-
Cellulosum microcrystallinum-50.0
Gelatinae mucilago 5 %q.s. (22.37)q.s. (36.97)

The Quality Assessment of Lactose Granules (LAC GRA) and Microcrystalline Cellulose Granules (MCC GRA)_

LAC GRAMCC GRA
Bulk density (g.cm−3)0.470 ± 0.0180.474 ± 0.028
Apparent specific volume (cm3.g−1)1.999 ± 0.0391.942 ± 0.028
Apparent density (g.cm−3)0.500 ± 0.0100.515 ± 0.007
Compressibility index (%)2.5 ± 0.05.0 ± 0.1
Hausner ratio1.03 ± 0.001.05 ± 0.00
Mechanical resistance (%)98.90 ± 0.6099.59 ± 1.01
Disintegration time (min)more than 10more than 10
Flow rate (g. s−1)4.49 ± 0.114.55 ± 0.10
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 20
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: May 7, 2023
|
Published on: Sep 7, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2023 M. Špaglová, M. Matušková, M.K. Lawson, M. Čuchorová, M. Čierna, D. Krchňák, V. Mikušová, J. Piešťanský, P. Mikuš, published by Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Pharmacy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.