Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving AODV Performance by Software Defined Networking Using NS3 Cover

Improving AODV Performance by Software Defined Networking Using NS3

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 27 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)
By: Hanene Brahmia,  Chérif Tolba and  Toufik Hafs  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. [1] W. Qi-wu, Q. Liu, and W. Wen, “Comparative study of VANET routing protocols,” International Conference on Cyberspace Technology (CCT 2014), Beijing, China, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2014.1306
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] K. T. Mahima, M. Ayoob, and G. Poravi, “Adversarial attacks and defense technologies on Autonomous Vehicles: A Review,” Applied Computer Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 96–106, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2021-0012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] N.V. Dharani Kumari and B.S. Shylaja, “AMGRP: AHP-based multimetric geographical routing protocol for urban environment of VANETs,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 72–81, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.01.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] M. A. Masrur, A. G. Skowronska, J. Hancock, S. W. Kolhoff, D. Z. McGrew, J. C. Vandiver, and J. Gatherer, “Military-based vehicle-to-grid and vehicle-to-vehicle microgrid – system architecture and implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 157–171, Mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2017.2779268
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] C. N. Van Phu, N. Farhi, H. Haj-Salem, and J.-P. Lebacque, “A vehicle-to-infrastructure communication based algorithm for urban traffic control,” in 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Naples, Italy, 2017, pp. 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2017.8005594
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] I. Wahid, A. A. Ikram, M. Ahmad, S. Ali, and A. Ali, “State of the art routing protocols in VANETs: A review,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 130, pp. 689–694, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.121
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] M. R. Ghori, K. Z. Zamli, N. Quosthoni, M. Hisyam, and M. Montaser, “Vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET): Review,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Innovative Research and Development (ICIRD), Bangkok, Thailand, May 2018, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRD.2018.8376311
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] R. A. Nazib and S. Moh, “Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle-aided vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 77535–77560, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989790
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] S. Boussoufa-Lahlah, F. Semchedine, and L. Bouallouche-Medjkoune, “Geographic routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): A survey,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 11, pp. 20–31, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2018.01.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] S. K. Bhoi and P. M. Khilar, “Vehicular communication: A survey,” IET Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 204–217, Sep. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-net.2013.0065
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] A. K. Basil, M. Ismail, M. A. Altahrawi, H. Mahdi, and N. Ramli, “Performance of AODV and OLSR routing protocols in VANET under various traffic scenarios,” in 2017 IEEE 13th Malaysia International Conference on Communications (MICC), Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Nov. 2017, pp. 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MICC.2017.8311742
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] D. S. Sandhu and S. Sharma, “Performance evaluation of DSDV, DSR, OLSR, TORA routing protocols – A review,” in Mobile Communication and Power Engineering, vol 296, V.V. Das and Y. Chaba, Eds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35864-7_77
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] J. M. Garcia-Campos, D. G. Reina, S. L. Toral, N. Bessis, F. Barrero, E. Asimakopoulou, and R. Hill, “Performance evaluation of reactive routing protocols for VANETs in urban scenarios following good simulation practices,” in 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Santa Catarina, Brazil, Jun. 2015, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] S. Liu, Y. Yang, and W. Wang, “Research of AODV routing protocol for ad hoc networks1,” AASRI Procedia, vol. 5, pp. 21–31, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasri.2013.10.054
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] L. Zhu, C. Li, B. Xia, Y. He, and Q. Lin, “A hybrid routing protocol for 3-D vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1239–1248, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2490341
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] S. Goumiri, M. A. Riahla, and M. Hamadouche, “Security issues in self-organized ad-hoc networks (Manet, VANET, and FANET): A survey,” in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications, AIAP 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 413, B. Lejdel, E. Clementini, and L. Alarabi, Eds. Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96311-8_29
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] A. Rasheed, S. Gillani, S. Ajmal, and A. Qayyum, “Vehicular Ad Hoc network (VANET): A survey, challenges, and applications,” in Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET): A Survey, Challenges, and Applications, vol. 548, A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, M. Mohamad Saad, Eds. Springer, Singapore, 2017, pp. 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3503-6_4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] S. Khatri, H. Vachhani, S. Shah, J. Bhatia, M. Chaturvedi, S. Tanwar, and N. Kumar, “Machine learning models and techniques for VANET based traffic management: Implementation issues and challenges,” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 14, pp. 1778–1805, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-00993-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] K. Adhvaryu, “Performance comparison of multicast routing protocols based on Route Discovery Process for Manet,” in Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 89, G. Ranganathan, J. Chen, and Á. Rocha, Eds. Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0146-3_9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] E. E. Akkari Sallum, G. dos Santos, M. Alves, and M. M. Santos, “Performance analysis and comparison of the DSDV, AODV and OLSR routing protocols under VANETs,” in 2018 16th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Telecommunications (ITST), Lisboa, Portugal, Oct. 2018, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2018.8566825
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] M. Kaur and B. S. Sohi, “Efficient DAG task scheduling algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 735–743, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i12.735743
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] J. Toutouh, J. Garcia-Nieto, and E. Alba, “Intelligent OLSR routing protocol optimization for VANETs,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1884–1894, Mar. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2012.2188552
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] G. F. Ahmed, R. Barskar, and N. Barskar, “An improved DSDV routing protocol for wireless ad hoc networks,” Procedia Technology, vol. 6, pp. 822–831, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.10.100
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] C. O. Asogwa, X. Zhang, D. Xiao, and A. Hamed, “Experimental Analysis of AODV, DSR and DSDV protocols based on Wireless Body Area Network,” in Internet of Things, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 312, Y. Wang and X. Zhang, Eds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32427-7_25
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] E. Amiri and R. Hooshmand, “Retracted article: Improved AODV based on Topsis and fuzzy algorithms in vehicular ad-hoc networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 947–961, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06894-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] H. Brahmia and C. Tolba, “Vanet routing protocols: Discussion of various ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) improvements,” in 2018 3rd International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS), Tebessa, Algeria, Oct. 2018, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PAIS.2018.8598502
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] O. S. Al-Heety, Z. Zakaria, M. Ismail, M. M. Shakir, S. Alani, and H. Alsariera, “A comprehensive survey: Benefits, services, recent works, challenges, security, and use cases for SDN-VANET,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 91028–91047, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992580
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] H. D. Ali and A. H. Abdulqader, “Using software defined network (SDN) controllers to enhance communication between two vehicles in vehicular ad hoc network (VANET),” in 2021 7th International Conference on Contemporary Information Technology and Mathematics (ICCITM), Mosul, Iraq, Aug. 2021, pp. 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITM53167.2021.9677720
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner, “OpenFlow,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69–74, Apr. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1355734.1355746
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Z. He, J. Cao, and X. Liu, “SDVN: Enabling rapid network innovation for heterogeneous vehicular communication,” IEEE Network, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 10–15, Jul. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2016.7513858
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] W.Ben Jaballah, M.Conti, and C.Lal, “A survey on software-defined VANETs: benefits, challenges, and future directions,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1904.04577, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.04577
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Md. Mahmudul Islam, M. T. R. Khan, M. M. Saad, and D. Kim, “Software-defined vehicular network (SDVN): A survey on architecture and routing,” Journal of Systems Architecture, vol. 114, Mar. 2021, Art no. 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101961
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] The Network Simulator ns-3. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsnam.org/. Accessed on: Oct. 26, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] SourceForge, “Eclipse SUMO – simulation of Urban mobility”. [Online]. Available: http://sumo.sourceforge.net/. Accessed on: Oct. 26, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2022-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 165
Published on: Jan 24, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
AODV,
NS3,
OpenFlow,
SDN,
SUMO,
trace mobility,
vehicular network VANET
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2023 Hanene Brahmia, Chérif Tolba, Toufik Hafs, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 27 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)Next article