Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Challenges of the Presumption of Innocence in Lithuanian Criminal Proceedings Cover

The Challenges of the Presumption of Innocence in Lithuanian Criminal Proceedings

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4.XI.1950;
  2. The Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, October 25th, 1992, Parliamentary record, No. 11
  3. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Valstybės žinios No. 89-2741, 2000;
  4. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Valstybės žinios, No. 37-1341, 2002;
  5. The Law on amending articles of 3, 233, 235, 254, 303, 305, 307, 309, 327, 331, 387, 444 and 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania, TAR No. 2017-19449;
  6. The Law on the provision of information to the public of the Republic of Lithuania, Valstybės žinios, No. 82-3254, 2006.
  7. The Lithuanian Code of Ethics for Public Information, TAR No. 10556, 2020.
  8. Baranskaitė A. (2008). Atleidimo nuo baudžiamosios atsakomybės kaltininkui ir nukentėjusiajam susitaikius procesinės problemos“, Jurisprudencija. Mokslo darbai, No. 11-113, Mykolas Romeris University: Vilnius;
  9. Goda G. (2018). Nekaltumo prezumpcijos principo reikšmė suėjus baudžiamosios atsakomybės taikymo senačiai. Teisė No. 107, Vilnius;
  10. Švedas G., Abramavičius A., Prapiestis J. (2020). Lietuvos Baudžiamoji teisė bendroji dalis, 2nd book, Vilnius: Vilnius University.
  11. The ECHR decision February 10th, 1995 in case Allenet De Ribemont v. France, No. 15175/89l
  12. The ECHR decision February 8th, 1996 in case John Murray v. Great Britain No. 18731/91;
  13. The ECHR decision March 26th, 2002 in case Butkevičius v. Lithuania No. 48297/99;
  14. The ECHR decision June 27th, 2006 in the case Kuvikas v. Lithuania No. 21837/02;
  15. The ECHR decision November 24th, 2009 in the case Shannov v. Latvia No. 32214/03;
  16. The ECHR decision January 18th, 2011 in case Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom No. 31411/07;
  17. The ECHR decision December 20th, 2011 in case G.C.P. vs Romania No. 20899/03;
  18. The ECHR decision June 20th, 2013 in case Lavrechov v. Czech Republic No. 57404/08;
  19. The ECHR decision February 27th, 2014 in case Karaman v. Germany No. 17103/10;
  20. The ECHR decision February 23th, 2016 in case Navalnyy and Ofitserov vs Russia No. 46632/13;
  21. The ECHR decision March 17th, 2016 in case Rasul Jafarov v Azerbaijan No. 69981/14
  22. The ECHR decision January 24th, 2017 in case Paulikas v. Lithuania No. 57435/09;
  23. The ECHR decision October 31th, 2017 in the case Bauras v. Lithuania (No. 56795/13);
  24. The ECHR decision of May 29th, 2019 in case of Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan No. 15172/13;
  25. The ECHR decision March 27th, 1991 in case Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. Great Britain No. 12383/86;
  26. The ECHR decision April 6th, 2000 in the case Labita v. Italy No. 26772/95.
  27. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, December 29th, 2004 decision in case No. 8/02-16/02-25/02-9/03-10/03-11/03-36/03-37/03-06/04-09/04-20/04-26/04-30/04-31/04-32/04-34/04-41/04;
  28. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, June 27th, 2016 decision in case No. 3/2015-13/2015-15/2015;
  29. The senate Supreme Court of Lithuania, June 3rd, 2003 resolution No. 3 “Regarding case law in the application of norms of the Criminal Procedure Code, which regulate the recording of a verdict”;
  30. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, November 15th, 2005 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-586/2005;
  31. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, January 6th, 2009 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-P-9/2009;
  32. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, June 25th, 2009, the review of case law court practice on the application of the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code, which determine the limits of the trial in court, No. A-1
  33. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, June 19th, 2015 ruling in criminal case No. 3K-3-395-469/2015;
  34. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, June 14th, 2016 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-217-511/2016;
  35. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, January 8th, 2019 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-56-788/2019;
  36. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, November 25th, 2019 ruling in criminal case No. E3K-3-353-313/2019;
  37. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, December 22nd, 2022 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-257-697/2022;
  38. The Supreme Court of Lithuania, Criminal Cases Division, March 7th, 2023 ruling in criminal case No. 2K-47-697/2023;
  39. Vilnius Regional Court Criminal Cases Division, March 7th, 2023 judgment in criminal case No. 1A-74-312/2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpro-2024-0009 | Journal eISSN: 3044-7259 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6077
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 109
Published on: Nov 5, 2024
Published by: Turiba University Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Giedrius Nemeikšis, published by Turiba University Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.