Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Which democracy does AI support? Mapping AI applications for civic participation Cover

Which democracy does AI support? Mapping AI applications for civic participation

By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Akrich, Madeleine. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In Bijker, W., Law, J. (eds.). (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Arana-Catania, Miguel et al. (2021). Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy. Digital Government: Research and Practice. Vol. 2, no. 3,, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452118
  3. Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216–24., https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
  4. Beacock, Saltz et al. (2025). Facilitation in the AI Era: A Community Roadmap for Technologies to Support Practitioners. Jigsaw. Accessed on 3rd February 2026. Available online at: https://services.google.com/fh/files/blogs/jigsaw_facilitation_in_the_ai_era.pdf
  5. Bherer, Laurence; Gauthierm, Mario; SIMARD, Louis (eds.) (2017). The professionalization of public participation. London: Routledge.
  6. Brinkmann, Svend; Kvale, Steinar (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  7. Blue, Gwendolyn; Dale, Jacquie. (2016). Framing and Power in Public Deliberation with Climate Change: Critical Reflections on the Role of Deliberative Practitioners. Journal of Deliberative Democracy. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 242. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.242
  8. Bono Rossello, Nicolas; Simonofski, Anthony; Castiaux, Annick. (2025). Artificial intelligence for digital citizen participation: Design principles for a collective intelligence architecture. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 102020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102020
  9. Campagnucci, Fernanda et al. (2025). Policy Brief: Artificial Intelligence for Participation. Brazil Chair, Institute of Political Science. University of Münster.
  10. Chappell, Nathan; Rosenkrans, Scott. (2025). Nonprofit AI: A comprehensive Guide to Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Social Good. Hoboken: Wiley.
  11. Chenoweth, Erica, eds. (2025). How AI Can Support Democracy Movements: Summary Report of a Research and Practice Workshop. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Occasional Paper, Harvard Kennedy School.
  12. Crawford, Kate. (2016). Can an Algorithm be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391558963
  13. Crawford, Kate. (2021). The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
  14. Curato, Nicole; Hammond, Marit; Min, John B. (2019). Power in Deliberative Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan
  15. Dahlberg, Lincoln (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions.’ New Media & Society. Vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389569
  16. Darwin Holmes, Andrew Gary. (2020). Researcher Positionality—A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research—A New Researcher Guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
  17. Deseriis, Marco. (2021). Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new framework. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2452–2473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929678
  18. Escobar, Oliver; Bua, Adrian. (2026). Democratic innovation for change: A participatory corrective to deliberative hegemony. Politics, 46(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957251349635
  19. Eubanks, Virginia. (2025). AI has a democracy problem—Here’s why. Nature. Vol. 647, no. 8090, pp. 580–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03718-w
  20. Fishkin, James et al. (2025). Scaling Dialogue for Democracy: Can Automated Deliberation Create More Deliberative Voters? Perspectives on Politics, 23(2), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724001749
  21. Fitzpatrick, Katherine. (2015). The Relationship Between Professionalization and Transparency in the German Nonprofit Sector. Doctoral Dissertation. Organizational Studies Department, University of Michigan
  22. Forst, Rainer. (2015). Noumenal Power. The Journal of Political Philosophy. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 111–127.
  23. Gagnon, Jean-Paul; Abrams, Benjamin. (2025). The sciences of the democracies. UCL Press
  24. Gilardi, Fabrizio et al. (2024). We need to understand the effect of narratives about generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour. Vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2251–2252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02026-z
  25. Goldberg, Beth et al. (2024). AI and the Future of Digital Public Squares (arXiv:2412.09988). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.09988
  26. Goldberg, Saskia; Bächtiger, André. (2023). Catching the ‘Deliberative Wave’? How (Disaffected) Citizens Assess Deliberative Citizen Forums. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000059
  27. Gordon, Eric; LOPEZ, Rogelio Alejandro. (2019). The Practice of Civic Tech: Tensions in the Adoption and Use of New Technologies in Community Based Organizations. Media and Communication. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 57–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2180
  28. Hao, Karen. (2025). Empire of AI. Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman’s OpenAI. Penguin Press
  29. Hwang, Hokyu; Powell, Walter W. (2009). The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 268–298.
  30. Jacquet, Vincent; Ryan, Matt; van Der Does, Ramon. (2023). The Impacts of Democratic Innovations. ECPR Press
  31. Jungherr, Andreas; Rauchfleisch, Adrian. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Deliberation: The AI Penalty and the Emergence of a New Deliberative Divide. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 102049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102079.
  32. Karanja, John Maina; Musili, Macrina Mbaika. (2026). The Dawn of Generative AI-Enabled Political Activism: How Kenyan Gen Z Used ChatGPT and Protest GPTs to Mobilize. Social Science Computer Review. pp. 08944393261416781. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393261416781
  33. Karppinen, Kari; Moe, Hallvard; Svensson, Jakob. (2025). What Democracy Are We Talking About? Journal of Information Policy. Vol. 15, pp. 2. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.15.2025.0002
  34. Landemore, Hélène. (2024). Can Artificial Intelligence Bring Deliberation to the Masses?. In Chang, R & Srinivasan, A. (eds.). Conversations in Philosophy, Law, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864523.003.0003
  35. Large, Oliver; Britton, Laura; IOSAD, Alexander. (2025). Governing in the Age of AI: Reimagining Local Government. London: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
  36. Malý, Michal; Sandri, Giulia; Barberà, Oscar. (2026). Synthetic political actors: an exploration into emerging AI-driven candidates and parties [version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Open Research Europe. Vol. 6, pp. 138 (https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.23686.1)
  37. Mansbridge, Jane. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
  38. Mansbridge, Jane. (1990). Democracy and common interests. Social alternatives. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. , 20–25.
  39. Mansbridge, Jane et al. (2010). The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 64–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00344.x.
  40. Mazeaud, Alice; Nonjon, Magali. (2018). Le Marché de la démocratie participative. Editions du Croquant.
  41. Mckinney, Sammy. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Citizens’ Assemblies: Benefits, Concerns and Future Pathways. Journal of Deliberative Democracy. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. Article 1. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.1556
  42. Moats, David; Tseng, Yu-Shan. (2024). Sorting a public? Using quali-quantitative methods to interrogate the role of algorithms in digital democracy platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 27(5), 973–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2230286
  43. Mouffe, Chantal. (1999). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? Social Research. Vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 745–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349.
  44. Mouffe, C. (2005). The Democratic Paradox. London and New York: Verso
  45. Mouffe, Chantal. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso Books
  46. Mowshowitz, Abbe; Kawaguchi, Akira. (2005). Measuring search engine bias. Information Processing & Management. Vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.05.005
  47. Nagy, Peter; Neff, Gina. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. Social Media + Society. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 2056305115603385. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
  48. Nasi, Francesco. (2025). Exacerbating, alleviating, or overcoming? Exploring the nexus between artificial intelligence and the crisis of democracy. Discover Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00331-8
  49. Nasi, Francesco. (2026). “When Is AI Democratic? Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Empowerment.” AI & SOCIETY. doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03097-4.
  50. Neff, Gina. (2024). Can Democracy Survive AI? Sociologica. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. Article 3. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/21108
  51. OECD. (2024). Enabling Digital Innovation in Government: The OECD GovTech Policy Framework. OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/a51eb9b2-en.
  52. OECD. (2025). Tackling civic participation challenges with emerging technologies. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb37a30-en.
  53. Oleart, Alvaro; Palomo, Nicolàs. (2025). Why AI Technosolutionism Harms Democracy and Deliberation: The EU, Citizens Assemblies and the Habermas Machine. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 21(1), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.1839
  54. Parker, Charlie; Scott, Sam; Geddes, Alistair. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710
  55. REGILME, Salvador Santino F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Colonialism: Environmental Damage, Labor Exploitation, and Human Rights Crises in the Global South. SAIS Review of International Affairs. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 75–92.
  56. Sætra, Henrik Skaug. (2020). A Shallow Defence of a Technocracy of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Political Harms of Algorithmic Governance in the Domain of Government. Technology in Society. Vol. 62, pp. 101283. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101283.
  57. Saldivar, Jorge; Parra, Cristhian; Alcaraz, Marcelo Alcaraz; Arteta, Rebeca; Cernuzzi, Luca. (2019). Civic Technology for Social Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 169–207. doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9311-7.
  58. Schrock, Andrew R. (2019). What is Civic Tech? Defining a Practice of Technical Pluralism. In P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), The Right to the Smart City (p. 0). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191009
  59. Shin, Bokyong et al. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954
  60. Sieber, Renée; Brandusescu, Ana; Sangiambut, Suthee; Adu-Daako, Abigail. (2025). What is civic participation in artificial intelligence? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. Vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1388–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241296200
  61. Smith, Graham. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848
  62. Tessler, Michael Henry et al. (2024). AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation. Science. Vol. 386, no. 6719, pp. eadq2852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq2852
  63. Tsai, Lily L. et al. (2024). Generative AI for Pro-Democracy Platforms. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.5aaf489a
  64. Tseng, Yu-Shan. (2022). Algorithmic empowerment: A comparative ethnography of two open-source algorithmic platforms – Decide Madrid and vTaiwan. Big Data & Society. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 205395172211235. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221123505
  65. Turan, Deger; Mckenzie, Colleen. (2024). How AI can be used to inform policymaking? AI4Democracy, IE Centre for the Governance of Change.
  66. Young, Iris Marion. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpo-2026-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8220 (formerly 1804-8220)
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 69
Submitted on: Oct 7, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 15, 2026
Published on: Oct 13, 2026
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Francesco Nasi, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.