Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The unseen crisis: Substantive political representation and over-indebtedness in the Czech Republic

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Abou-Chadi, Tarik; Wagner, Markus. (2021). The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed? The Journal of Politics. Vol. 81, no. 4. 10.1086/704436.
  2. Amendment No. 1326. (2018). https://public.psp.cz/en/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=71.
  3. Amendment No. 1327. (2018). https://public.psp.cz/en/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=71.
  4. Amendment No. 1366. (2018). https://public.psp.cz/en/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=71.
  5. Amendment No. 1376. (2018). https://public.psp.cz/en/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=71.
  6. Amendment No. 4518. (2020). https://www.psp.cz/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=545.
  7. Amendment No. 5466. (2020). https://www.psp.cz/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=545.
  8. Amendment No. 7366. (2021). https://www.psp.cz/sqw/historie.sqw?o=8&t=545.
  9. Ball, Terence; Bellamy, Richard. (2003). The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521563543.
  10. Bargsted, Matías, et al. (2023). Social and Political Trust in a Low Trust Society. Political Behavior. Vol. 45, pp. 1401–1420. 10.1007/s11109-021-09762-2.
  11. Bartels, M. Larry. (2008). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  12. Bohle, Dorothee. (2013). Post-Socialist Housing Meets Transnational Finance: Foreign Banks, Mortgage Lending, and the Privatization of Welfare in Hungary and Estonia. Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 913–948. 10.1080/09692290.2013.801022.
  13. Bohle, Dorothee. (2018). Mortgaging Europe’s Periphery. Studies in Comparative International Development. Vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 196–217. 10.1007/s12116-018-9260-7.
  14. Bobzien, Licia. (2023). Income Inequality and Political Trust: Do Fairness Perceptions Matter?. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 169, 505–528. 10.1007/s11205-023-03168-9.
  15. Branham, J. Alexander; Soroka, N. Stuart; Wlezien, Christopher. (2017). When Do the Rich Win? Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 43–62. 10.1002/polq.12577.
  16. Burstein, Paul. (2014). American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress: What the Public Wants and What It Gets. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107040205.
  17. Chamber of Deputies. (2018). Verbatim Record of Part of the Discussion of the Item on the Agenda. psp.cz. 2018. https://www.psp.cz/eknih/2017ps/stenprot/020schuz/bqbs/b14511201.htm.
  18. Chamber of Deputies. (2021). Verbatim Record of Part of the Discussion of the Item on the Agenda. psp.cz. 2021. https://www.psp.cz/eknih/2017ps/stenprot/098schuz/bqbs/b12833601.htm.
  19. CVVM. (2021). Česká veřejnost o fungování demokracie a nedemokratických alternativách politického systému. https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/a5482/f9/pd211213.pdf.
  20. Dale, Gareth; Fabry, Adam. (2018). Neoliberalism in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. In Cahil, Damien; Cooper, Melinda; Konings, Martijn (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 234–247.
  21. Dimock, Michael. (2019). An Update on Our Research Into Trust, Facts and Democracy. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/2019/06/05/an-update-on-our-research-into-trust-facts-and-democracy/.
  22. Dunn, William M. (2004). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780205677924.
  23. Durnová, Anna. (2011). Diskurzivní přístupy v policy analysis. In Nekola, Martin; Geissler, Hana; Mouralová, Magdalena (eds.). Současné metodologické otázky veřejné politiky. Prague: Karolinum. ISBN 9788024618654.
  24. Eibl, Otto; Gregor, Miloš. (2019). Volby Do Poslanecké Sněmovny v Roce 2017. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  25. Enns, Peter K. (2015). Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1053–1064. 10.1017/s1537592715002315.
  26. Etzerodt, Søren Frank; Kongshøj, Kristian. (2022). The implosion of radical right populism and the path forward for social democracy: Evidence from the 2019 Danish national election. Scandinavian Political Studies. Vol. 45, no. 3, p. 279300. 10.1111/1467-9477.12225.
  27. Eulau, Heinz; Karps, Paul D. (1977). The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 233–254. 10.2307/439340.
  28. Exekutorská komora ČR. (2025). Otevřená data o exekucích. Statistiky.ekcr.info. 2020. https://statistiky.ekcr.info/statistiky.
  29. Gagyi, Agnes; Mikuš, Marek. (2023). Introduction: Boom, Crisis and Politics of Swiss Franc Mortgages in Eastern Europe: Comparing Trajectories of Dependent Financialization of Housing. City. Vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 560–578. 10.1080/13604813.2023.2229695.
  30. Giger, Nathalie; Rosset, Jan; Bernauer, Julian. (2012). The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective. Representation. Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 47–61. 10.1080/00344893.2012.653238.
  31. Gilens, Martin. (2005). Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 778–796. 10.1093/poq/nfi058.
  32. Grossmann, Jakub; Jurajda, Štěpán. (2025). Voting under Debtor Distress. Electoral Studies. pp. 1–10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379425000356.
  33. Hábl, Radek, et al. (2021). Proč je u nás 5 milionů exekucí? Centrum pro společenské otázky – SPOT. https://www.pracevobci.cz/upload/studies/24/Jak-rostly-dluhy-FINAL.pdf.
  34. Hořeni Samec, Tomáš. (2021). “For the Sake of Consumer Protection”: Blending Paternalism and Neoliberalism in the Discursive Financialization of Households in the Czech Republic. In Mikuš, Marek; Rodik, Petra. (eds.). Households and Financialization in Europe: Mapping Variegated Patterns in Semi-Peripheries. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 148–168. ISBN 978-0367464554.
  35. Hoření Samec, Tomáš; Trlifajová, Lucie. (2023). Protect or punish debtors? Policymaker discourse on the state’s role in personal debt governance. New Political Economy. Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 958–970. 10.1080/13563467.2023.2215703.
  36. Hloušek, Vít; Kopeček, Lubomír. (2018). Politické strany: Původ, ideologie a transformace politických stran v západní a střední Evropě. Prague: Grada Publishing.
  37. Jacobs, Lawrence R.; Page, I. Benjamin. (2005). Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy? American Political Science Review. Vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 107–123. 10.1017/s000305540505152x.
  38. Johnson, E. Juliet; Barnes, Andrew. (2014). Financial Nationalism and Its International Enablers: The Hungarian Experience. Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 535–569. 10.1080/09692290.2014.919336.
  39. Kinder, R. Donald. (1997). Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics. In Gilbert, Daniel T.; Fiske, Susan T.; Lindzey, Gardner (eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York, US: McGraw-Hill, pp. 778–867.
  40. Kruglanski, W. Arie; Molinario, Erica; Sensales, Gilda. (2021). Why Populism Attracts: On the Allure of Certainty and Dignity. In Forgas, Joseph P.; Crano, William D.; Fiedler, Klaus (eds.). The Psychology of Populism: The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy. New York: Routledge, pp. 158–173.
  41. Lax, R. Jeffrey; Phillips, H. Justin. (2011). The Democratic Deficit in the States. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 148–166. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x.
  42. Lupu, Noam; Warner, Zach. (2022). Affluence and Congruence: Unequal Representation around the World. The Journal of Politics. Vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 276–290. 10.1086/714930.
  43. Marcos-Marne, Hugo; Plaza-Colodro, Carolina; Freyburg, Tina. (2019). Who Votes for New Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes. West European Politics. Vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–21. 10.1080/01402382.2019.1608752.
  44. Mikuš, Marek; Rodik, Petra; eds. (2021) Households and Financialization in Europe: Mapping Variegated Patterns in Semi-Peripheries. London and New York: Routledge.
  45. Median. (2018). Exekuce v Česku: Zkušenosti poloviny chudých Čechů a dopady exekucí. Research. https://a2larm.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Chudoba_a_exekuce.pdf.
  46. Parliamentary file 71/0. (2018). Government Bill Amending Act No. 182/2006 Coll. https://public.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?O=8&CT=71&CT1=0.
  47. Parliamentary file 545/0. (2019). Government Bill Amending Act No. 99/1963 Coll. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/tiskt.sqw?o=8&ct=545&ct1=0.
  48. Pereira, Miguel M. (2021). Understanding and Reducing Biases in Elite Beliefs about the Electorate. American Political Science Review. Vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1308–1324. 10.1017/s000305542100037x.
  49. Perottino, Michel; Polášek, Martin. (2013). Czech Republic. In Waele, Jean-Michel; Escalona, Fabien; Vieira, Mathieu (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 416–434.
  50. Piketty, Thomas. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  51. Pitkin, Hanna. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University Of California Press.
  52. Rodik, Petra. (2015). The Impact of the Swiss Franc Loans Crisis on Croatian Households. In Değirmencioğlu, Serdar M.; Walker, Carl (eds.). Social and Psychological Dimensions of Personal Debt and the Debt Industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61–83.
  53. Rodik, Petra; Mikuš, Marek. (2023). Moral Economies of Housing in Post-Boom Croatia: Swiss Franc Loans Crisis and Politics of Housing Financialization. City. Vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 579–598. 10.1080/13604813.2023.2229196.
  54. Rosset, Jan; Giger, Nathalie; Bernauer, Julian. (2013). More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation. West European Politics. Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 817–835. 10.1080/01402382.2013.783353.
  55. Rovny, Jan. (2015). Party Competition Structure in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 40–60. 10.1177/0888325414567535.
  56. Sabl, Andrew. (2015). The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 345–365. 10.1017/s1537592715000079.
  57. Scheiring, Gábor. (2021). Varieties of Dependency, Varieties of Populism: Neoliberalism and the Populist Countermovements in the Visegrád Four. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 1569–1595. 10.1080/09668136.2021.1973376.
  58. Shafritz, Jay M. (2004). Dictionary of Public Policy and Administration. Boulder: Westview Press.
  59. Šitera, Daniel. (2021). Exploring neoliberal resilience: the transnational politics of austerity in Czechia. Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 781–810. 10.1057/s41268-021-00214-2.
  60. Šitera, Daniel. (2023). Politics of the debtfare state: repoliticizing the Czech debt enforcement order and its limits. Critical Sociology. Vol. 49, no. 4–5, pp. 829–845. 10.1177/08969205221104177.
  61. Šmatera, Václav; Pinková, Aneta. (2024). Silent Struggles: Exploring Apathy and Civic Passivity among Czech Citizens in Debt Enforcement. Politics in Central Europe. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 379–402. 10.2478/pce-2024-0017.
  62. Stiglitz, E. Joseph. (2012). The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.
  63. Stimson, A. James; Mackuen, B. Michael; Erikson, S. Robert. (1995). Dynamic Representation. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 543–565. 10.2307/2082973.
  64. Trlifajová, Lucie; Hurrle, Jakob. (2018). Work Must Pay: Does It? Precarious Employment and Employment Motivation for Low-Income Households. Journal of European Social Policy, 376–395.
  65. Vote on Amendment n. 1326. (2018). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=68373&l=cz.
  66. Vote on Amendment n. 1327. (2018). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=68381.
  67. Vote on Amendment n 1366. (2018). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=68376&l=cz.
  68. Vote on Amendment n. 1376. (2018). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=68375&l=cz.
  69. Vote on Amendment n. 4518. (2021). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=75971&l=cz.
  70. Vote on Amendment n. 5466. (2021). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=75991&l=cz.
  71. Vote on Amendment n. 7366. (2021). Psp.cz. https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hlasy.sqw?g=75985.
  72. Wahlke, C. John. (1971). Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented. British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 271–290. 10.1017/s0007123400009121.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpo-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8220 | Journal ISSN: 1804-1302
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 60
Submitted on: Nov 29, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2025
Published on: Oct 3, 2025
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Václav Šmatera, Michal Pink, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.