Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Statistical data on modal frequencies of the bridge-vehicle system determined by the FDD method
| Mode No. | Mean modal frequency fFDD [Hz] | Range of modal frequencies fmin - f max [Hz] | Dominant [Hz] | Standard deviation σ [Hz] | Max. relative variation | Variability factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.511 | 0.507-0.517 | 0.507 | 0.004 | 2.11 | 0.8048 |
| 2 | 1.038 | 1.032-1.047 | 1.035 | 0.013 | 1.46 | 1.2733 |
| 3 | 1.391 | 1.376-1.404 | 1.389 | 0.017 | 1.98 | 1.2172 |
| 4 | 1.480 | 1.471-1.489 | 1.489 | 0.046 | 1.24 | 3.0779 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 2.023-2.069 | 2.023 | 0.022 | 2.24 | 1.0929 |
Natural frequencies of the bridge-vehicles system determined by the RDM method and statistical data of the modal damping ratios
| Mode No. | Mean modal frequency fRDM [Hz] | Mean damping ratio | Range of damping ratio ξmin- ξmax [%] | Standard deviation Σ | Max. relative variation | Variability factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.514 | 2.35 | 1.84-2.69 | 0.32 | 36.17 | 13.62 |
| 2 | 1.032 | 1.62 | 1.44-1.94 | 0.17 | 30.78 | 10.49 |
| 3 | 1.377 | 1.42 | 1.29-1.55 | 0.10 | 18.35 | 7.04 |
| 4 | 1.494 | 3.61 | 2.90-4.13 | 0.42 | 34.12 | 11.63 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 1.68 | 1.25-1.98 | 0.32 | 43.45 | 19.13 |
Comparison of the average natural (fFDD, fRDM) and forced (fPP) vibration frequency values of the bridge-vehicle system determined using different techniques
| Mode No. | Mean vibration frequency fPP [Hz] | Mean modal frequency fFDD [Hz] | Mean modal frequency fRDM [Hz] | Relative variation | Relative variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.513 | 0.511 | 0.514 | -0.39 | 0.19 |
| 2 | 1.033 | 1.038 | 1.032 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
| 3 | 1.389 | 1.391 | 1.377 | 0.14 | -0.86 |
| 4 | 1.489 | 1.480 | 1.494 | -0.60 | 0.34 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 2.046 | 2.046 | 0.00 | 0.00 |