Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.
![Schematic cross-section of the bridge deck slab [18]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/68ed236481e1b93419696e64/j_acee-2025-0040_fig_003.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKGCRBRRSI%2F20260228%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260228T111523Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEIX%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJHMEUCIQD%2BHLERkDvlfc8m9zQGnKvgj3mvj4p6YHv%2BCs9RSiojCAIgKlbPTFv2VpDpU56gHF5hnSmaP%2BTg5LScKXzxmHMXIuAqvAUIThACGgw5NjMxMzQyODk5NDAiDFB3RcRLNJPoc%2BYCEyqZBc90F44JFqRJLrs7%2F8QGWCa6B9VYyBo9OJ%2FHbl9zqOlcykpyk0a22NwAGy7dRe5ImhzYRPT%2BjI4G6Gufjlxi%2Bs3RcB1B4AFWVYD9270pkKNpGcFfGkWWSZvBcL3WF4gBYZ58s710CCld9Zl9bjNtSa2ODVhvdz7JftEKy%2FYoH5bbT%2BU%2BzbNIUTmERjQJoKrkhYzt4IaD0k84d6Gz0N76dA4pmKezx2tAnqx1AavZWv%2BnjxAkLSbYB05LSfiIJHi5u840E3YOBoHZYv04AU33FsCqbhwNAKy1sLt19b9vBNiE4EooANeFZhBcUdSy3kBJmDK1pqDKtJk6oSKqAh1zJHepk2vmawzfvUtzYIv6Yg4oRsD1LmwIGmdZwRLqItBx%2BbsjXhTb3TLupA9a7PMXWlHFkZaZH5D%2BcvkCrMGZKw56QAaMLQC79GvmyZaoH5bs2gUJX896loFOYxtM9VG%2FDN1K%2FEYNKGHxoym8UrwnMXo8Lot%2FllhCXt7Ur5MZ0HhKUAKIVH6gIkhOsFVbwYTMXU0zhbE6GnYl04XUZfwMQ3tvvDwh21%2BHY5KMSTpp2b3penetbMX52BY0TpRpgQOlandd6YMMFMz4qj5VjsvJIMnAJHkoMVjqWlZdnXTy1XNRV0AeoRaW%2FfehjxHw3cijZPwT56bXz9F8eO3efbREyR6jsFGeLxvWhmGzyvJiGY10ZNafEPaTFMEoE2Vs%2FSvDPYl70nWndTBzNffCEUAxvoySuZd0TkzS%2BxYhxZYegzHKZRon65zwOBMa8Zq72S%2BXw6tF%2FLE5SC8i3zkMCFOXlBum%2Forybu7Fz7EIgDF4T9a1hdezcsm%2BR1UONYxIsJwISaEn1BceGR7vSRPAc19HctyBEqvXyWkgNSUZMOP0ic0GOrEBjHzlan3UDL%2F7pTSVFNU0QvRtEyXTY0T9n4dxl%2FoPWULDT37OR%2FJstoj76cMRKesbww8nrLrhsnAJCMCJ5k%2BE%2B9tIns%2Fxew%2F2tDolSTw7Zbkt6%2FXR7Z9IYFtLmVTRYSpiym6DLhiWUif%2BHmoACwnM9OkpDQ89D%2F01twM1dIh5VrDMKmQjT6Mrtuvw9oPRguQ2kLDK4WfdZ%2F7RJfJZeVJAX8sqr9k77UYZ%2B7gq2DXP8XbX&X-Amz-Signature=100c4d0ec11cb473ac59d8fafbac2986bebc835ced0d579523960725487677f6&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Statistical data on modal frequencies of the bridge-vehicle system determined by the FDD method
| Mode No. | Mean modal frequency fFDD [Hz] | Range of modal frequencies fmin - f max [Hz] | Dominant [Hz] | Standard deviation σ [Hz] | Max. relative variation | Variability factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.511 | 0.507-0.517 | 0.507 | 0.004 | 2.11 | 0.8048 |
| 2 | 1.038 | 1.032-1.047 | 1.035 | 0.013 | 1.46 | 1.2733 |
| 3 | 1.391 | 1.376-1.404 | 1.389 | 0.017 | 1.98 | 1.2172 |
| 4 | 1.480 | 1.471-1.489 | 1.489 | 0.046 | 1.24 | 3.0779 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 2.023-2.069 | 2.023 | 0.022 | 2.24 | 1.0929 |
Natural frequencies of the bridge-vehicles system determined by the RDM method and statistical data of the modal damping ratios
| Mode No. | Mean modal frequency fRDM [Hz] | Mean damping ratio | Range of damping ratio ξmin- ξmax [%] | Standard deviation Σ | Max. relative variation | Variability factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.514 | 2.35 | 1.84-2.69 | 0.32 | 36.17 | 13.62 |
| 2 | 1.032 | 1.62 | 1.44-1.94 | 0.17 | 30.78 | 10.49 |
| 3 | 1.377 | 1.42 | 1.29-1.55 | 0.10 | 18.35 | 7.04 |
| 4 | 1.494 | 3.61 | 2.90-4.13 | 0.42 | 34.12 | 11.63 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 1.68 | 1.25-1.98 | 0.32 | 43.45 | 19.13 |
Comparison of the average natural (fFDD, fRDM) and forced (fPP) vibration frequency values of the bridge-vehicle system determined using different techniques
| Mode No. | Mean vibration frequency fPP [Hz] | Mean modal frequency fFDD [Hz] | Mean modal frequency fRDM [Hz] | Relative variation | Relative variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.513 | 0.511 | 0.514 | -0.39 | 0.19 |
| 2 | 1.033 | 1.038 | 1.032 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
| 3 | 1.389 | 1.391 | 1.377 | 0.14 | -0.86 |
| 4 | 1.489 | 1.480 | 1.494 | -0.60 | 0.34 |
| 5 | 2.046 | 2.046 | 2.046 | 0.00 | 0.00 |