References
- Latka, J. F. (2017). Paper in architecture Research by design, engineering and prototyping. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment (Vol. 7). A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment. Retrieved from
https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/1875 - Diarte, J., & Shaffer, M. (2021). Cardboard Architecture. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 18(1), 58–65.
https://doi.org/10.17831/ENQARCC.V18I1.1103 - Packaging waste statistics – Statistics Explained. (n.d.). Retrieved December 23, 2022, from
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Packaging_waste_statistics&oldid=559603 - European Paper Recycling Council (EPRC). (2020). European Declaration on Paper Recycling, 1–8.
- Beurden, H. van. (2015). Paper breakthroughs. European answers to societal challenges. Amsterdam.
- Eekhout, M., Verheijen, F., & Visser, R. (2008). Cardboard in Architecture. IOS Press. Retrieved from http://files/271/Eekhout – 2008 – Cardboard in Architecture.pdf
- Kumar, G., & Raheja, G. (2016). Design Determinants of Building Envelope for Sustainable Built Environment: A Review. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 3(2).
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v3.n2.127 - Jasiolek, A., Latka, J., & Brzezicki, M. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Paper-based Building Envelopes for Semi-permanent Architecture: Original Proposals and Suggestions for Designers. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 9(2), 47–72.
https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5510 - Cripps, A. (2004). Cardboard as a construction material: a case study. Building Research & Information, 32(3), 207–219.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210410001686273 - Meer, C. van der. (2013). Developing the W-house, the world’s first house made from wrapped cardboard. Delft University of Technology.
- Wolf, A., Rebecca, B., Nihat, K., Ulrich, K., Wilfinger, M., Bach, R., … Knaack, U. (2021). A Full Performance Paper House. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 9(1), 252.
https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.1.5533 - Vaccari, M., & Sassi, P. (2015). Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Building Material. In IASS WORKING GROUPS 12 + 18 International Colloquium 2015 “Bio-based and Bio-inspired Environmentally Compatible Structures.” Retrieved from http://files/279/Vaccari i Sassi – 2015 – Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Buildin.pdf
- Ayan, O. (2009). Cardboard in architectural technology and structural engineering a conceptual approach to cardboard buildings in architecture. ETH Zurich. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006080626 - Bach, R. (2020). Papier Fassaden : Entwicklung konstruktiver Prinzipien für Fassaden aus Papierwerkstoffen mit Fokus auf Brandschutz, Wärmedämmung, Feuchteschutz und ökologische Eigenschaften. Aachen University.
- Qin, P., Yi, D., Xing, J., Zhou, M., & Hao, J. (2021). Study on flame retardancy of ammonium polyphosphate/montmorillonite nanocompound coated cellulose paper and its application as surface flame retarded treatment for polypropylene. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10427-1 - Si, Y., & Guo, Z. (2016). Eco-friendly functionalized superhydrophobic recycled paper with enhanced flame-retardancy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 477, 74–82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.044 - Jasiolek, A., Latka, J., & Brzezicki, M. (2021). Biodegradable methods of impregnating paperboard for its use as a building material. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(5), 1081–1089.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1920640 - Kuusipalo, J. (2000). PHB/V in extrusion coating of paper and paperboard: Part I: Study of functional properties. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 8(1), 39–47.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010124205584 - Bach, R., & Hildebrand, L. (2018). A comparative overview of tools for environmental assessment of materials, components and buildings. In Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools (pp. 143–158).
- Hildebrand, L., & Hollberg, A. (2018). Methodology for Assessing Environmental Quality of Materials and Construction. In S. Kosanovic, T. Klein, T. Konstantinou, & L. Hildebrand (Eds.), Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools (pp. 121–142). TU Delft Open.
https://doi.org/978-94-6366-032-7 - ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework (2006).
- ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines (2006).
- EN 15804:2012+A2:2019. Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products. (2019).
- Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H. J., Doka, G., Dones, R., Heck, T., … Spielmann, M. (2005). The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10(1), 3–9.
https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1 - Hischier, R., Althaus, H. J., & Werner, F. (2004). Developments in Wood and Packaging Materials Life Cycle Inventories in ecoinvent (9 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2005 10:1, 10(1), 50–58.
https://doi.org/10.1065/LCA2004.11.181.6 - Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., & Matthews, D. (2014). Life cycle assessment: Quantitative approach for decisions that matter. Retrieved from
https://www.lcatextbook.com/ - Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2018). Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 783–793.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217 - Bare, J. C., Hofstetter, P., Pennington, D. W., & de Haes, H. A. U. (2000). Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6), 319–326.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978665